• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 37, Issue 7, 712001 (2017)
Zhai Liang, Wang Tao, Bai Manshe, Zuo Yijuan, Su Yu, Liu Xin, Chen Jing, and Zhu Liangjian
Author Affiliations
  • [in Chinese]
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/aos201737.0712001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zhai Liang, Wang Tao, Bai Manshe, Zuo Yijuan, Su Yu, Liu Xin, Chen Jing, Zhu Liangjian. Real-Time Loss Measurement of Reflecting Mirrors Applied in Plasma Environment[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2017, 37(7): 712001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Dot structural light measurement model
    Fig. 1. Dot structural light measurement model
    Dot structural light calibration model
    Fig. 2. Dot structural light calibration model
    Diagram of 2D vision measurement method with immediate plane calibration
    Fig. 3. Diagram of 2D vision measurement method with immediate plane calibration
    (a) Lens distortion model in imaging processing; (b) diagram of distortion distribution
    Fig. 4. (a) Lens distortion model in imaging processing; (b) diagram of distortion distribution
    Sub-pixel light spot center distribution image using Gaussian fitting
    Fig. 5. Sub-pixel light spot center distribution image using Gaussian fitting
    (a-c) Images of laser points from three directions and (d-f) of sub-pixel light spot center distribution
    Fig. 6. (a-c) Images of laser points from three directions and (d-f) of sub-pixel light spot center distribution
    Devise used for measurement experiment
    Fig. 7. Devise used for measurement experiment
    Specimen images captured in the experiment processing
    Fig. 8. Specimen images captured in the experiment processing
    Displacement-time curves measured by different methods
    Fig. 9. Displacement-time curves measured by different methods
    CategoryPrinciple point /pixelFocal length /pixelDistortioncoefficient /pixel-2Re-projectionerror /pixel
    Intrinsicparameters(u0,v0)=(813.249, 617.416)(fx,fy)=(1849.169, 1848.517)(k1,k2)=(-0.001763, 0.002371)(p1,p2)=(0.001156, 0.001922)0.0718
    Structuralparametersl1:(a1,b1,c1)=(65.131,30.224,1.717); (A1,B1,C1)=(-10.258,-5.365,30.106)l2:(a2,b2,c2)=(51.678,-33.161,2.554); (A2,B2,C2)=(-10.380,6.331,29.887) l3:(a3,b3,c3)=(-20.443,7.339,0.170); (A3,B3,C3)=(4.548,-5.372,31.671)
    Table 1. Calibration results of measurement system
    MethodAverage relative displacement /mm
    IPC0.0340.0670.0990.1340.1670.2010.233
    UIPC0.0340.0650.0980.1290.1600.1910.221
    LPM0.0330.0650.0970.1300.1610.1920.221
    CLPM0.0330.0670.1000.1340.1660.2000.232
    PMM0.0340.0680.1010.1350.1680.2010.234
    Table 2. Average relative displacement of four feature points obtained by different methods
    Zhai Liang, Wang Tao, Bai Manshe, Zuo Yijuan, Su Yu, Liu Xin, Chen Jing, Zhu Liangjian. Real-Time Loss Measurement of Reflecting Mirrors Applied in Plasma Environment[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2017, 37(7): 712001
    Download Citation