• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 12, 1210005 (2021)
Lu Fu1、*, Yanguo Fan1, Guosheng Li1, Dingfeng Yu2, and Jianglong Chai3
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Oceanography and Space Informatics, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China
  • 2Institute of Oceanographic Instrumentation, Qilu University of Technology, Shandong Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong 266061, China
  • 3Hisense, Qingdao, Shandong 266071, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.1210005 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Lu Fu, Yanguo Fan, Guosheng Li, Dingfeng Yu, Jianglong Chai. Grid Motion Statistics Fast Matching Algorithm for Rotating Images[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(12): 1210005 Copy Citation Text show less
    Matching process of motion statistical model
    Fig. 1. Matching process of motion statistical model
    Mesh frame and motion kernel model
    Fig. 2. Mesh frame and motion kernel model
    Rotating motion kernels
    Fig. 3. Rotating motion kernels
    Experimental images of rotation angle calculation. (a) Reference image; (b) 72°; (c) 144°; (d) 216°; (e) 288°
    Fig. 4. Experimental images of rotation angle calculation. (a) Reference image; (b) 72°; (c) 144°; (d) 216°; (e) 288°
    Main direction angle change distribution before and after mismatch elimination. (a) Before mismatch elimination; (b) after mismatch elimination
    Fig. 5. Main direction angle change distribution before and after mismatch elimination. (a) Before mismatch elimination; (b) after mismatch elimination
    Three groups of boat images from different angles. (a) Image 1;(b) image 2;(c) image 3
    Fig. 6. Three groups of boat images from different angles. (a) Image 1;(b) image 2;(c) image 3
    Actual images taken. (a) Image 4; (b) image 5; (c) image 6
    Fig. 7. Actual images taken. (a) Image 4; (b) image 5; (c) image 6
    Comparison of feature matching results. (a) Image 1; (b) image 2; (c) image 3; (d) image 4; (e) image 5; (f) image 6
    Fig. 8. Comparison of feature matching results. (a) Image 1; (b) image 2; (c) image 3; (d) image 4; (e) image 5; (f) image 6
    No.Rotation angle /(°)
    (1)337.5--360.0,0--22.5
    (2)22.5-- 67.5
    (3)67.5--112.5
    (4)112.5--157.5
    (5)157.5--202.5
    (6)202.5--247.5
    (7)247.5--292.5
    (8)292.5--337.5
    Table 1. Rotation angles corresponding to optimal shape of motion kernels
    Rotation angle /(°)Mean value /(°)Standard deviation /(°)Difference from actual rotation angle /(°)
    7271.991.420.01
    144143.891.520.11
    216215.871.610.13
    288287.931.430.07
    Table 2. Statistical results of main direction angle
    ImageAlgorithmRough matching pairFine matching pairCorrect matching pair
    Fig.6(a)ORB+RT1000463432
    SIFT+RT1000458426
    ORB+GMS(ORB+ours)1000654634
    Fig.6(b)ORB+RT1000373349
    SIFT+RT1000333308
    ORB+GMS(ORB+ours)1000563529
    Fig.6(c)ORB+RT1000265218
    SIFT+RT1000299256
    ORB+GMS(ORB+ours)1000467378
    Fig.7(a)ORB+RT3000574226
    SIFT+RT3000492180
    ORB+GMS(ORB+ours)3000840347
    Fig.7(b)ORB+RT3000983464
    SIFT+RT3000948258
    ORB+GMS(ORB+ours)30001726651
    Fig.7(c)ORB+RT300013721269
    SIFT+RT30001071921
    ORB+GMS(ORB+ours)300021071856
    Table 3. Number of matches for different algorithms
    AlgorithmTime /s
    Fig.6(a)Fig.6(b)Fig.6(c)Fig.7(a)Fig.7(b)Fig.7(c)
    ORB+RT0.0940.0930.0891.7950.9871.135
    SIFT+RT0.2450.2350.2304.5964.1754.191
    ORB+GMS1.0240.9250.8023.0681.9422.168
    ORB+ours0.2180.2050.1901.9621.1061.244
    Table 4. Comparison of matching time of different algorithms
    Lu Fu, Yanguo Fan, Guosheng Li, Dingfeng Yu, Jianglong Chai. Grid Motion Statistics Fast Matching Algorithm for Rotating Images[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(12): 1210005
    Download Citation