Author Affiliations
1Key Laboratory of Optical Calibration and Characterization, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei Institutes of physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China2University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China3Beijing Institute of Remote Sensing Information, Beijing 100085, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. 3D radiation model structure diagram of the sea surface
Fig. 2. 3D structure of the sea surface under different sea conditions. (a) Level 1 sea state; (b) Level 2 sea state; (c) Level 3 sea state; (d) Level 4 sea state
Fig. 3. BRDF of seawater at different wavebands calculated by 6S
Fig. 4. Reflectivity of the whitecaps at different zenith and azimuths angles
Fig. 5. Patch type judgment
Fig. 6. High-resolution satellite ocean background imaging simulation flowchart
Fig. 7. [in Chinese]
Fig. 7. Radiation field at the entrance pupil of the satellite under different wave levels. L1: Level 1 waves; L2: Level 2 waves; L3: Level 3 waves; L4: Level 4 waves
Fig. 8. ZY3-02 star PMS load spectral response function
Fig. 9. Calculated camera point spread function and MTF curve. (a) Point spread function; (b) MTF
Fig. 10. Comparison of simulation results with satellite data. (a) Simulating the sea surface of Band1; (b) ZY3-02 measured sea surface of Band1; (c) Simulating the sea surface of Band2; (d) ZY3-02 measured sea surface of Band2; (e) Simulating the sea surface of Band3; (f) ZY3-02 measuring the sea surface of Band3
Fig. 11. [in Chinese]
Fig. 11. Comparison of radiation distribution between simulated and measured results. (a) Simulating the sea surface of Band1; (b) ZY3-02 measured sea surface of Band1; (c) Simulating the sea surface of Band2; (d) ZY3-02 measured sea surface of Band2; (e) Simulating the sea surface of Band3; (f) ZY3-02 measuring the sea surface of Band3
Wave level | Sea state | Wave high/m | Wind rating(level) | Wind speed/m·s−1 | No waves | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0.2 | Tiny waves | 1 | 0-0.1 | 1 | 0.3-1.5 | Small waves | 2 | 0.1-0.5 | 2 | 1.6-3.3 | Light waves | 3 | 0.5-1.25 | 3-4 | 3.4-7.9 | Middle waves | 4 | 1.25-2.5 | 5 | 8-10.7 | Billow | 5 | 2.5-4 | 6 | 10.8-13.8 | Mountainous waves | 6 | 4-6 | 7 | 13.9-17.1 | Wild waves | 7 | 6-9 | 8-9 | 17.2-24.4 | Angry sea | 8 | 9-14 | >10 | >24.5 |
|
Table 1. Sea state table
Parameter | Value | Wind speed/m·s-1 | 8 | Wind direction | N | Salt content/ppt | 34.6 | Chlorophyll concentration/mg·m-3 | 3.0 | Sun zenith/(°) | 56.6 | Sun azimuth/(°) | 160.4 |
|
Table 2. Input parameter table of 6S
Simulation band | Band1(450-520 nm)\Band2(520-590 nm\Band3(630-690 nm) | ZY3-02 imaging time | Beijing time 11:00:10-11:00:18 | Sun zenith angle/(°) | 56.63 | Sun azimuth/(°) | 160.4 | Observation azimuth/(°) | 237.32 | Observation zenith angle/(°) | 0.1 | Resolution/m | 5.8 | MODISSatellite imaging time | Beijing time 11:05 | AOD@550 nm | 0.196 | Wind speed/m·s−1 | 8 | Wind direction | N | Chlorophyll concentration/mg·m−3 | 3 | Salt content/ppt | 34.6 |
|
Table 3. Simulation conditions
Image type | Max | | Min | | Mean | | Standard deviation | B1 | B2 | B3 | B1 | B2 | B3 | B1 | B2 | B3 | B1 | B2 | B3 | ZY3-02(DN) | 338 | 299 | 209 | | 243 | 196 | 130 | | 260 | 216.5 | 146.3 | | 6.57 | 6.91 | 5.78 | Simulation(DN) | 318.6 | 276.3 | 182.5 | 266.1 | 216 | 137.9 | 273.3 | 223.5 | 141.6 | 5.8 | 6.1 | 5.4 | Mean relative error | 8.6% | 7.8% | 3.7% | 9.9% |
|
Table 4. Comparison of simulation results and measured results