• Infrared and Laser Engineering
  • Vol. 50, Issue 9, 20200514 (2021)
Bo Song1、2, Wenyu Cui1, Lili Du1, Chuanjie Zhou3, and Weining Yi1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Optical Calibration and Characterization, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei Institutes of physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
  • 2University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
  • 3Beijing Institute of Remote Sensing Information, Beijing 100085, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20200514 Cite this Article
    Bo Song, Wenyu Cui, Lili Du, Chuanjie Zhou, Weining Yi. High-resolution satellite ocean background imaging simulation method[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2021, 50(9): 20200514 Copy Citation Text show less
    3D radiation model structure diagram of the sea surface
    Fig. 1. 3D radiation model structure diagram of the sea surface
    3D structure of the sea surface under different sea conditions. (a) Level 1 sea state; (b) Level 2 sea state; (c) Level 3 sea state; (d) Level 4 sea state
    Fig. 2. 3D structure of the sea surface under different sea conditions. (a) Level 1 sea state; (b) Level 2 sea state; (c) Level 3 sea state; (d) Level 4 sea state
    BRDF of seawater at different wavebands calculated by 6S
    Fig. 3. BRDF of seawater at different wavebands calculated by 6S
    Reflectivity of the whitecaps at different zenith and azimuths angles
    Fig. 4. Reflectivity of the whitecaps at different zenith and azimuths angles
    Patch type judgment
    Fig. 5. Patch type judgment
    High-resolution satellite ocean background imaging simulation flowchart
    Fig. 6. High-resolution satellite ocean background imaging simulation flowchart
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 7. [in Chinese]
    Radiation field at the entrance pupil of the satellite under different wave levels. L1: Level 1 waves; L2: Level 2 waves; L3: Level 3 waves; L4: Level 4 waves
    Fig. 7. Radiation field at the entrance pupil of the satellite under different wave levels. L1: Level 1 waves; L2: Level 2 waves; L3: Level 3 waves; L4: Level 4 waves
    ZY3-02 star PMS load spectral response function
    Fig. 8. ZY3-02 star PMS load spectral response function
    Calculated camera point spread function and MTF curve. (a) Point spread function; (b) MTF
    Fig. 9. Calculated camera point spread function and MTF curve. (a) Point spread function; (b) MTF
    Comparison of simulation results with satellite data. (a) Simulating the sea surface of Band1; (b) ZY3-02 measured sea surface of Band1; (c) Simulating the sea surface of Band2; (d) ZY3-02 measured sea surface of Band2; (e) Simulating the sea surface of Band3; (f) ZY3-02 measuring the sea surface of Band3
    Fig. 10. Comparison of simulation results with satellite data. (a) Simulating the sea surface of Band1; (b) ZY3-02 measured sea surface of Band1; (c) Simulating the sea surface of Band2; (d) ZY3-02 measured sea surface of Band2; (e) Simulating the sea surface of Band3; (f) ZY3-02 measuring the sea surface of Band3
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 11. [in Chinese]
    Comparison of radiation distribution between simulated and measured results. (a) Simulating the sea surface of Band1; (b) ZY3-02 measured sea surface of Band1; (c) Simulating the sea surface of Band2; (d) ZY3-02 measured sea surface of Band2; (e) Simulating the sea surface of Band3; (f) ZY3-02 measuring the sea surface of Band3
    Fig. 11. Comparison of radiation distribution between simulated and measured results. (a) Simulating the sea surface of Band1; (b) ZY3-02 measured sea surface of Band1; (c) Simulating the sea surface of Band2; (d) ZY3-02 measured sea surface of Band2; (e) Simulating the sea surface of Band3; (f) ZY3-02 measuring the sea surface of Band3
    Wave levelSea stateWave high/mWind rating(level)Wind speed/m·s−1
    No waves0000-0.2
    Tiny waves10-0.110.3-1.5
    Small waves20.1-0.521.6-3.3
    Light waves30.5-1.253-43.4-7.9
    Middle waves41.25-2.558-10.7
    Billow52.5-4610.8-13.8
    Mountainous waves64-6713.9-17.1
    Wild waves76-98-917.2-24.4
    Angry sea89-14>10>24.5
    Table 1. Sea state table
    ParameterValue
    Wind speed/m·s-18
    Wind directionN
    Salt content/ppt34.6
    Chlorophyll concentration/mg·m-33.0
    Sun zenith/(°)56.6
    Sun azimuth/(°)160.4
    Table 2. Input parameter table of 6S
    Simulation bandBand1(450-520 nm)\Band2(520-590 nm\Band3(630-690 nm)
    ZY3-02 imaging timeBeijing time 11:00:10-11:00:18
    Sun zenith angle/(°)56.63
    Sun azimuth/(°)160.4
    Observation azimuth/(°)237.32
    Observation zenith angle/(°)0.1
    Resolution/m5.8
    MODISSatellite imaging timeBeijing time 11:05
    AOD@550 nm0.196
    Wind speed/m·s−18
    Wind directionN
    Chlorophyll concentration/mg·m−33
    Salt content/ppt34.6
    Table 3. Simulation conditions
    Image typeMaxMinMeanStandard deviation
    B1B2B3B1B2B3B1B2B3B1B2B3
    ZY3-02(DN)338299209243196130260216.5146.36.576.915.78
    Simulation(DN)318.6276.3182.5266.1216137.9273.3223.5141.65.86.15.4
    Mean relative error8.6%7.8%3.7%9.9%
    Table 4. Comparison of simulation results and measured results
    Bo Song, Wenyu Cui, Lili Du, Chuanjie Zhou, Weining Yi. High-resolution satellite ocean background imaging simulation method[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2021, 50(9): 20200514
    Download Citation