Author Affiliations
1Science and Technology on Optical Radiation Laboratory, Beijing 100854, China2Beijing Electro-Mechanical Engineering Institute, Beijing 100074, China3Beijing Space Information Relay and Transmission Technology Research Center, Beijing 100094, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Schematic of measuring principle of light wave polarization state
Fig. 2. Schematic of polarizer angle change during each rotation period
Fig. 3. Process of solving infrared polarized images by iterative sorting method
Fig. 4. Typical infrared polarized cold reflection phenomenon
Fig. 5. Infrared DOP and infrared AOP images with different rotation periods. (a) (b) (c) Infrared polarization degree images with rotation periods of 400, 600, 900 r/min; (d) (e) (f) corresponding infrared polarization angle images
Fig. 6. Infrared DOP and infrared AOP images with different integration times. (a) (b) (c) Infrared polarization degree images with integration times of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 ms; (d) (e) (f) corresponding infrared polarization angle image
Fig. 7. Cold reflection effect deduction processing results. (a) Infrared intensity images with different polarization directions; (b) cold reflection spot reference images; (c) corrected infrared intensity images
Fig. 8. polarization polarization images of airbus. (a) Intensity image; (b) DOP image; (c) AOP image
Rotationperiod /(r·min-1) | Region 1 | Region 2 |
---|
DOP | AOP | DOP | AOP |
---|
400 | 0.0267 | 0.4783 | 0.0199 | 0.4097 | 600 | 0.0264 | 0.4781 | 0.0202 | 0.4162 | 900 | 0.0265 | 0.4784 | 0.0197 | 0.4156 |
|
Table 1. Comparison of infrared DOP and infrared AOP values in different regions with different rotation periods
Integration time /ms | Region 1 | Region 2 |
---|
DOP | AOP | DOP | AOP |
---|
0.5 | 0.0234 | -0.2535 | 0.0165 | -0.3129 | 1.0 | 0.0251 | 0.4462 | 0.0172 | 0.4848 | 1.5 | 0.0264 | 0.4781 | 0.0202 | 0.4162 |
|
Table 2. Comparison of infrared DOP and infrared AOP values in different regions with different integration time
Type | Intensity | DOP | AOP |
---|
Contrast | 0.0182 | 0.3831 | 0.3405 |
|
Table 3. Airbus infrared image contrast results