• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 38, Issue 12, 1215006 (2018)
Peixuan Li1、2、3、4、*, Pengfei Liu1、2、3、4, Feidao Cao1、2、3、4, and Huaici Zhao1、3、4、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1 Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, China
  • 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3 Laboratory of Opto-Electronic Information Processing, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, China
  • 4 Key Laboratory of Image Understanding and Computer Vision, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201838.1215006 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Peixuan Li, Pengfei Liu, Feidao Cao, Huaici Zhao. Weight-Adaptive Cross-Scale Algorithm for Stereo Matching[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(12): 1215006 Copy Citation Text show less
    Image (blue box) and mismatching points (black box) of certain pixel window when cost aggregation performed at different scales. (a) Original image; (b) second-scale image
    Fig. 1. Image (blue box) and mismatching points (black box) of certain pixel window when cost aggregation performed at different scales. (a) Original image; (b) second-scale image
    Different images and corresponding information entropy. (a) E=0 for pure white image information; (b) E=0 for pure black image; (c) E=1.0413 for 4-grid image; (d) E=1.3476 for 16-grid image; (e) E=5.0542 for image in blue box of Fig. 1(b); (f) E=5.6215 for image in blue box of Fig. 1(a)
    Fig. 2. Different images and corresponding information entropy. (a) E=0 for pure white image information; (b) E=0 for pure black image; (c) E=1.0413 for 4-grid image; (d) E=1.3476 for 16-grid image; (e) E=5.0542 for image in blue box of Fig. 1(b); (f) E=5.6215 for image in blue box of Fig. 1(a)
    Parallax maps of Teddy images by different methods
    Fig. 3. Parallax maps of Teddy images by different methods
    Parameterτ1τ2αηSλ
    Value0.027450.007840.11240.27
    Table 1. Parameters for proposed cross-scale cost matching algorithm
    Stereo PairsS+BOXAS+BOX
    Non-occludedAllNon-occludedAll
    Bowling210.0722.469.4321.64
    Baby110.9215.368.3512.68
    Cloth37.4211.667.0111.00
    Flowerpots15.5930.7814.4329.75
    Lampshade230.4136.5824.7231.33
    Midd146.5349.4342.0045.16
    Monopoly37.0842.4825.4431.78
    Plastic56.1257.3855.4756.77
    Rocks112.0417.4211.9417.31
    Wood113.1119.2512.7518.92
    Books15.5122.2214.9121.68
    Moebius16.8222.6416.5222.36
    Dolls7.5114.727.5114.75
    Baby26.8812.126.9312.18
    Wood216.7718.2216.8018.25
    Rocks28.7915.148.8215.19
    Teddy7.1816.137.1316.01
    Cones3.9913.563.8613.52
    Average17.9324.3116.3422.80
    Table 2. Matching error comparison between proposed method and that in Ref. [12] when dead pixel rate is 2%
    Stereo pairsS+GFAS+GF
    Bowling26.752207.32107
    Baby15.436315.54525
    Cloth36.288906.33252
    Flowerpots6.562786.68801
    Lampshade27.533227.98634
    Midd16.962937.36999
    Monopoly6.578556.82937
    Plastic6.940707.30089
    Rocks16.179696.27993
    Wood16.430606.46233
    Books6.307726.76049
    Moebius6.035196.98040
    Dolls5.917856.18341
    Baby25.187775.40952
    Wood26.262646.80027
    Rocks25.783235.95239
    Teddy5.554706.00646
    Cones5.568985.85602
    Average6.2379986.559148
    Table 3. Running time comparison for cost aggregation by guiding filterss
    Peixuan Li, Pengfei Liu, Feidao Cao, Huaici Zhao. Weight-Adaptive Cross-Scale Algorithm for Stereo Matching[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(12): 1215006
    Download Citation