• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 39, Issue 2, 0212001 (2019)
Yinghua Zhang1、2、3、*, Ang Li1、*, Pinhua Xie1, Lei Yang1, Jin Xu1, Chaogang Zhang1, and Zhaokun Hu1
Author Affiliations
  • 1 Key Laboratory of Environmental Optics & Technology, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei, Anhui 230031, China;
  • 2 University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China
  • 3 Department of General Education, Anhui Xinhua University, Hefei, Anhui 230088, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201939.0212001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yinghua Zhang, Ang Li, Pinhua Xie, Lei Yang, Jin Xu, Chaogang Zhang, Zhaokun Hu. Influence of Filter on Column density of Polluted Gas in Non-Dispersive Imaging System[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(2): 0212001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Transmittance peak types and wavelength ranges of different band-pass filters. (a) λc=458 nm, w1/2=2 nm; (b) λc=450 nm, w1/2=10 nm; (c) λc=450 nm, w1/2=40 nm
    Fig. 1. Transmittance peak types and wavelength ranges of different band-pass filters. (a) λc=458 nm, w1/2=2 nm; (b) λc=450 nm, w1/2=10 nm; (c) λc=450 nm, w1/2=40 nm
    Relationship between central wavelength and incident angle. (a) Transmittance spectra; (b) curve of central wavelength versus incident angle
    Fig. 2. Relationship between central wavelength and incident angle. (a) Transmittance spectra; (b) curve of central wavelength versus incident angle
    Schematic of imaging system
    Fig. 3. Schematic of imaging system
    Absorption cross section of NO2 and H2O
    Fig. 4. Absorption cross section of NO2 and H2O
    SNRs of three filters
    Fig. 5. SNRs of three filters
    Plume maps under different exposure time. (a) 2 s; (b) 0.5 s
    Fig. 6. Plume maps under different exposure time. (a) 2 s; (b) 0.5 s
    SNR versus exposure time and number of superimposed images
    Fig. 7. SNR versus exposure time and number of superimposed images
    Relationship between column density of NO2 and optical density. (a) λc=458 nm, w1/2=2 nm; (b) λc=450 nm, w1/2=10 nm; (c) λc=450 nm, w1/2=40 nm
    Fig. 8. Relationship between column density of NO2 and optical density. (a) λc=458 nm, w1/2=2 nm; (b) λc=450 nm, w1/2=10 nm; (c) λc=450 nm, w1/2=40 nm
    Detection limits of filters
    Fig. 9. Detection limits of filters
    Master maps. (a) λc=450 nm; (b) λc=600 nm
    Fig. 10. Master maps. (a) λc=450 nm; (b) λc=600 nm
    Distributions of optical density and column density of NO2. (a) Optical density of filter with central wavelength of 450 nm; (b) optical density of filter with central wavelength of 600 nm; (c) differential optical density of NO2; (d) two-dimensional column density distribution of NO2
    Fig. 11. Distributions of optical density and column density of NO2. (a) Optical density of filter with central wavelength of 450 nm; (b) optical density of filter with central wavelength of 600 nm; (c) differential optical density of NO2; (d) two-dimensional column density distribution of NO2
    FilterCentral wavelength /nmChanges in band /nmWavelength range /nm
    450 nm, 10 nm450451.49-434.0917.40
    Table 1. Central wavelength of filter and its range of variation
    Yinghua Zhang, Ang Li, Pinhua Xie, Lei Yang, Jin Xu, Chaogang Zhang, Zhaokun Hu. Influence of Filter on Column density of Polluted Gas in Non-Dispersive Imaging System[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(2): 0212001
    Download Citation