Author Affiliations
1 Key Laboratory of Surface Engineering of Equipment for Hydraulic Engineering of Zhejiang Province, Standard & Quality Control Research Institute, Ministry of Water Resources, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, China;2 Water Machinery and Remanufacturing Technology Engineering Laboratory of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou Mechanical Research Institute, Ministry of Water Resources, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. XRD patterns of laser cladded Ni-based-alloy coatings
Fig. 2. Microhardness distribution in cross section of Ni-based-alloy coating
Fig. 3. Macro-morphologies of cracks in laser cladded Ni-based-alloy coatings. (a) 2.8 kW; (b) 3.2 kW; (c) 3.6 kW; (d) 4.0 kW
Fig. 4. Microstructure of cross-section of Ni-based-alloy coating and crack micro-morphology. (a) Overall morpholog; (b) morphology and microstructure of cross-section; (c) coarse crack; (d) microcrack
Fig. 5. Fracture morphology of crack in laser cladded Ni-based-alloy coating. (a) Overall fracture morphology; (b) river pattern of fracture surface; (c)(d)tearing ridge of fracture surface
Fig. 6. SEM morphology of crack and element distribution in laser cladded Ni-based-alloy coating. (a) SEM morphology; (b) Ni; (c) Cr; (d) Fe; (e) B; (f) C
Fig. 7. Effects of laser cladding process factors on cracking sensitivity (The rulers represent 10 mm). (a) Laser power (V=10 mm/s, Q=25.9 g/min, and T=100 ℃); (b) powder feeding rate (P=2.8 kW, V=10 mm/s, and T=100 ℃); (c) scanning speed (P=4.0 kW, Q=25.9 g/min, and T=100 ℃); (d) preheating temperature (P=2.8 kW, Q=22.7 g/min, and V=10 mm/s)
Material | C | Si | Mn | B | Fe | Cr | Ni | Cu | P | S |
---|
1550-00 | 0.45 | 3.90 | — | 2.30 | 2.90 | 11.00 | Bal. | — | — | — | 45 steel | 0.42-0.50 | 0.17-0.37 | 0.50-0.80 | — | Bal. | ≤0.25 | ≤0.25 | ≤0.25 | ≤0.035 | ≤0.035 |
|
Table 1. Chemical compositions of alloy powder and base material (mass fraction, %)
Point | C | B | Si | Fe | Cr | Ni |
---|
S1 | 10.63 | — | 3.79 | 15.40 | 6.96 | 63.22 | S2 | 16.14 | 7.79 | 0.15 | 1.22 | 73.57 | 1.13 | S3 | 12.75 | 16.04 | 2.33 | 9.40 | 12.73 | 46.75 |
|
Table 2. Compositional analysis by EDS (mass fraction, %)