• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 20, 2010014 (2021)
Wei Li and Zhongmin Li*
Author Affiliations
  • School of Information Engineering, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330063, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.2010014 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Wei Li, Zhongmin Li. NSST-Based Perception Fusion Method for Infrared and Visible Images[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(20): 2010014 Copy Citation Text show less
    Dcomposition process of NSST multi-scale and multi-directional
    Fig. 1. Dcomposition process of NSST multi-scale and multi-directional
    Structure of simple PA-PCNN model
    Fig. 2. Structure of simple PA-PCNN model
    Pixel logarithmic sub-image obtained by two-layer decomposition of low-frequency image. (a) D(1,0); (b) D(1,1); (c) D(2,0); (d) D(2,1)
    Fig. 3. Pixel logarithmic sub-image obtained by two-layer decomposition of low-frequency image. (a) D(1,0); (b) D(1,1); (c) D(2,0); (d) D(2,1)
    Basic framework of fusion method
    Fig. 4. Basic framework of fusion method
    Fusion results under different μ values. (a) μ→0; (b) μ=10; (c) μ=30; (d) μ=50; (e) μ=100; (f) μ=300; (g) μ=500; (h) μ→+¥
    Fig. 5. Fusion results under different μ values. (a) μ→0; (b) μ=10; (c) μ=30; (d) μ=50; (e) μ=100; (f) μ=300; (g) μ=500; (h) μ→+¥
    Fusion results of different methods under “Kayak” image. (a) IR image; (b) VIS image; (c) PCA method; (d) LatLRR method; (e) MSD method; (f) PCNN method; (g) PA-PCNN method; (h) proposed method
    Fig. 6. Fusion results of different methods under “Kayak” image. (a) IR image; (b) VIS image; (c) PCA method; (d) LatLRR method; (e) MSD method; (f) PCNN method; (g) PA-PCNN method; (h) proposed method
    Fusion results of different methods under “Road” image. (a) IR image; (b) VIS image; (c) PCA method; (d) LatLRR method; (e) MSD method; (f) PCNN method; (g) PA-PCNN method; (h) proposed method
    Fig. 7. Fusion results of different methods under “Road” image. (a) IR image; (b) VIS image; (c) PCA method; (d) LatLRR method; (e) MSD method; (f) PCNN method; (g) PA-PCNN method; (h) proposed method
    Fusion results of different methods under “Steamboard” image. (a) IR image; (b) VIS image; (c) PCA method; (d) LatLRR method; (e) MSD method; (f) PCNN method; (g) PA-PCNN method; (h) proposed method
    Fig. 8. Fusion results of different methods under “Steamboard” image. (a) IR image; (b) VIS image; (c) PCA method; (d) LatLRR method; (e) MSD method; (f) PCNN method; (g) PA-PCNN method; (h) proposed method
    MethodMI /bitCorrSDEN /bitSFCGAG
    PCA5.24560.336131.54186.12777.288646.85794.7974
    LatLRR1.98740.467819.37035.73526.409718.80493.6455
    MSD2.32050.271628.31586.10738.327326.73314.2563
    PCNN3.72980.494630.98326.30257.383730.14584.0942
    PA-PCNN1.65600.522325.00296.31008.457630.18425.0801
    Proposed method2.68730.588531.21976.52718.703123.82664.9239
    Table 1. Mean values of objective evaluation index by different methods
    Wei Li, Zhongmin Li. NSST-Based Perception Fusion Method for Infrared and Visible Images[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(20): 2010014
    Download Citation