• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 51, Issue 4, 0402105 (2024)
Chen Zhang1、*, Peipei Hu2, Xinwang Zhu3, and Changqi Yang2
Author Affiliations
  • 1The Institute of Technological Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, Hubei , China
  • 2Shanghai Spaceflight Precision Machinery Institute, Shanghai 201600, China
  • 3Hubei Institute of Measurement and Testing Technology, Wuhan 430223, Hubei , China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL231293 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Chen Zhang, Peipei Hu, Xinwang Zhu, Changqi Yang. Intelligent Online Detection of Laser Welding Defects Based on High Density Point Clouds (Invited)[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2024, 51(4): 0402105 Copy Citation Text show less
    Overall workflow chart of defect detection
    Fig. 1. Overall workflow chart of defect detection
    Experiment system for laser welding defect detection
    Fig. 2. Experiment system for laser welding defect detection
    Complete sample images of typical welds. (a) Sheet butt weld;(b) thick plate butt weld; (c) bead-on-plate weld
    Fig. 3. Complete sample images of typical welds. (a) Sheet butt weld;(b) thick plate butt weld; (c) bead-on-plate weld
    Different forms of data during data preprocessing. (a) Preprocessing of point cloud HDM data; (b) RGB images of surface defects; (c) high-density point cloud data; (d) depth images including 3D profile information of defects
    Fig. 4. Different forms of data during data preprocessing. (a) Preprocessing of point cloud HDM data; (b) RGB images of surface defects; (c) high-density point cloud data; (d) depth images including 3D profile information of defects
    Structural diagram of Faster R-CNN
    Fig. 5. Structural diagram of Faster R-CNN
    Detection results using Faster R-CNNs based on ResNet18, ResNet50, and ResNet101
    Fig. 6. Detection results using Faster R-CNNs based on ResNet18, ResNet50, and ResNet101
    Statistical results of three models. (a) Loss evolution of different models; (b) point cloud detection precisions and recall rates with different models; (c) detection precisions and recall rates of defects for point clouds and RGB images with different models; (d) detection mAPs of defects for point clouds and RGB images with different models; (e) testing time of different models
    Fig. 7. Statistical results of three models. (a) Loss evolution of different models; (b) point cloud detection precisions and recall rates with different models; (c) detection precisions and recall rates of defects for point clouds and RGB images with different models; (d) detection mAPs of defects for point clouds and RGB images with different models; (e) testing time of different models
    Typical false negative test results of Faster R-CNN model based on ResNet50
    Fig. 8. Typical false negative test results of Faster R-CNN model based on ResNet50
    Measurement process of defect sizes. (a) RGB images; (b) point clouds; (c) depth gray images; (d) threshold segmentation; (e) locating defect areas; (f) defect feature size measurement
    Fig. 9. Measurement process of defect sizes. (a) RGB images; (b) point clouds; (c) depth gray images; (d) threshold segmentation; (e) locating defect areas; (f) defect feature size measurement
    Relative errors of defect measurement results
    Fig. 10. Relative errors of defect measurement results
    ParameterValue
    Size of sensor /(pixel×pixel)(2×103)×(2×103
    Repeatability in Z direction /μm3.3
    Resolution of image on XY plane /mm0.06‒0.09
    Field of view /(mm×mm)71×90 ‒100×154
    Clearance distance /mm164
    Measuring range /mm110
    Table 1. Specific parameters of binocular structured light sensor
    ParameterRangeValue in online test
    SaggingUndercut
    Laser power /kW1‒624
    Welding speed /(m/min)0.5‒10.025
    Defocus /mm-5‒5-2-2
    Shielding gas flow rate /(L/min)1‒201515
    Table 2. Welding parameters
    ImageDatasetUndercutSaggingDefect-freeTotal numberData augmentation
    Point cloud imageTotal170150130450

    Noise addition

    Mirroring

    Training11910591315
    Testing514539135
    RBG imageTotal848036200

    Noise addition

    Mirroring

    Training585626140
    Testing26241060
    Table 3. Datasets after data augmentation
    ModelOverall precision /%Overall recall rate /%mAP /%Run time /s
    ResNet187977.072.40.191
    ResNet509389.591.90.194
    ResNet1017366.562.40.253
    Table 4. Performance parameters of three models based on point cloud analysis
    No.Defect typeMaximum depth /mmArea /mm2Width /mmLength /mmActual width /mmActual length /mm
    1Sagging1.5147.533.003.552.963.52
    22.0308.672.205.852.175.83
    31.8109.683.354.003.393.94
    4Undercut0.43818.971.4530.551.4730.64
    50.56533.661.2056.251.1856.34
    60.47323.860.9539.250.9239.32
    Table 5. Measurement results of defect sizes
    Chen Zhang, Peipei Hu, Xinwang Zhu, Changqi Yang. Intelligent Online Detection of Laser Welding Defects Based on High Density Point Clouds (Invited)[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2024, 51(4): 0402105
    Download Citation