• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 47, Issue 12, 1210001 (2020)
Zhuang Peng1、2, Shen Fahua3、*, Wang Bangxin1、2、4, Xie Chenbo1、2、4, Shao Jiadi1、2, Qiu Chengqun3, Liu Dong1、2、4, and Wang Yingjian1、2、4
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Optics Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, Anhui 230031, China
  • 2Science Island Branch of Graduate School, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China
  • 3Jiangsu Province Intelligent Optoelectronic Devices and Measurement-Control Engineering Research Center, Department of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng, Jiangsu 224002, China
  • 4Advanced Laser Technology Laboratory of Anhui Province, Hefei, Anhui 230037, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL202047.1210001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zhuang Peng, Shen Fahua, Wang Bangxin, Xie Chenbo, Shao Jiadi, Qiu Chengqun, Liu Dong, Wang Yingjian. Rayleigh-Mie Wind Lidar Based on Fabry-Perot Interferometer[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2020, 47(12): 1210001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of Doppler frequency measurement principle based on triple FPI
    Fig. 1. Schematic of Doppler frequency measurement principle based on triple FPI
    Schematic of Rayleigh-Mie Doppler lidar system based on triple FPI
    Fig. 2. Schematic of Rayleigh-Mie Doppler lidar system based on triple FPI
    Photos of verification system for Doppler lidar based on triple FPI
    Fig. 3. Photos of verification system for Doppler lidar based on triple FPI
    PMT output pulse signal collected by high-speed A/D acquisition card
    Fig. 4. PMT output pulse signal collected by high-speed A/D acquisition card
    Measured original transmittance data and the corresponding fitting curve when scanning the FPI cavity length
    Fig. 5. Measured original transmittance data and the corresponding fitting curve when scanning the FPI cavity length
    FPI transmittance curves when emitted laser/Mie and Rayleigh scattering light are incident
    Fig. 6. FPI transmittance curves when emitted laser/Mie and Rayleigh scattering light are incident
    Total wind speed measurement sensitivities when Mie or Rayleigh scattering signals are incident on FPI-1 and FPI-2
    Fig. 7. Total wind speed measurement sensitivities when Mie or Rayleigh scattering signals are incident on FPI-1 and FPI-2
    Five consecutive groups of radial wind speeds in the same direction. (a) Measuring profile; (b) measuring mean and variance
    Fig. 8. Five consecutive groups of radial wind speeds in the same direction. (a) Measuring profile; (b) measuring mean and variance
    Radial wind speed and error in East, South, West, and North with zenith angle of 27°. (a) Radial wind speed; (b) radial wind speed error
    Fig. 9. Radial wind speed and error in East, South, West, and North with zenith angle of 27°. (a) Radial wind speed; (b) radial wind speed error
    Comparison results of Doppler lidar verification system and radiosonde on the afternoon of May 12,2020. (a) Horizontal wind speed; (b) horizontal wind direction
    Fig. 10. Comparison results of Doppler lidar verification system and radiosonde on the afternoon of May 12,2020. (a) Horizontal wind speed; (b) horizontal wind direction
    Comparison results of Doppler lidar verification system and radiosonde on the night of May 18, 2020. (a) Horizontal wind speed; (b)horizontal wind direction
    Fig. 11. Comparison results of Doppler lidar verification system and radiosonde on the night of May 18, 2020. (a) Horizontal wind speed; (b)horizontal wind direction
    Horizontal wind field difference measured by two detection devices on the night of May 18, 2020. (a) Horizontal wind speed difference; (b) horizontal wind direction difference
    Fig. 12. Horizontal wind field difference measured by two detection devices on the night of May 18, 2020. (a) Horizontal wind speed difference; (b) horizontal wind direction difference
    ParameterValueParameterValue
    EmissionsystemNd∶YAG laserContinuum9030Wavelength /nm532ReceivingsystemTriple FPIET70FSR /GHz8
    Pulse energy /mJ430FWHM /GHz1
    Frequency /Hz30FPI-1 and -2peak-to-peak /GHz3.48
    Pulse width /ns4--8
    Line width /MHz90FPI-1 and -Lpeak-to-peak /GHz1.16
    Beam diameter /mm9
    Divergenceangle /mrad0.5Peak transmittance /%>60
    Caliber /mm80
    Beam expanderMagnification10FilterWavelength /nm532
    TransceiveropticalsystemCassegraintelescopeCaliber /mm300FWHM /nm0.5
    Focallength /mm2440Peak transmittance /%70
    Beam splitterT/R90/10; 50/50;30/70
    Receivingfield /mrad0.08
    PMT detectorModelR9880U-20
    Opticalefficiency /%85Operating modeAD+PC
    FiberCore diameter /mm0.2(edge)/0.1(lock)
    ScannerScan range /(°)360×90
    Caliber /mm350NA0.11
    Opticalefficiency /%60Acquisition cardSampling rate /(GHz/MHz)1000/20
    Table 1. Design parameters of verification system for Doppler lidar based on triple FPI
    Zhuang Peng, Shen Fahua, Wang Bangxin, Xie Chenbo, Shao Jiadi, Qiu Chengqun, Liu Dong, Wang Yingjian. Rayleigh-Mie Wind Lidar Based on Fabry-Perot Interferometer[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2020, 47(12): 1210001
    Download Citation