• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 60, Issue 24, 2410003 (2023)
Xiaoqiang Gao1, Kan Chang1、2、*, Mingyang Ling1, and Mengyu Yin1
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Computer and Electronic Information, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, China
  • 2Guangxi Key Laboratory of Multimedia Communications and Network Technology, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP230856 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xiaoqiang Gao, Kan Chang, Mingyang Ling, Mengyu Yin. Object Detection via Multimodal Adaptive Feature Fusion[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(24): 2410003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Structure of YOLOv5
    Fig. 1. Structure of YOLOv5
    Structure of MAFFNet
    Fig. 2. Structure of MAFFNet
    Structure of SFF
    Fig. 3. Structure of SFF
    Structure of JAM
    Fig. 4. Structure of JAM
    Qualitative comparison with other algorithms in FLIR dataset. (a) Truth image; (b) CFT; (c) ProbEn; (d) MAFFNet
    Fig. 5. Qualitative comparison with other algorithms in FLIR dataset. (a) Truth image; (b) CFT; (c) ProbEn; (d) MAFFNet
    MAFF moduleParameter quantity /106GFLOPsFPS /(frame·s-1mAP50
    PersonCarBicycleAll
    Without MAFF module76.47195.8250.8640.9120.6520.809
    MAFF_176.34194.1240.8680.9140.6760.819
    MAFF_275.95194.1240.8720.9100.6810.821
    MAFF_374.37197.1240.8670.9100.6680.815
    MAFF_1+MAFF_275.82192.4230.8820.9180.7010.834
    MAFF_1+MAFF_374.24192.4240.8790.9130.6900.827
    MAFF_2+MAFF_373.85192.4230.8790.9140.7360.843
    MAFF_1+MAFF_2 +MAFF_373.72190.8230.8860.9220.7400.849
    Table 1. Influence of the number of MAFF modules on object detection results
    ModuleParameter quantity /106GFLOPsFPS /(frame·s-1mAP50
    PersonCarBicycleAll
    JAM76.47195.8230.8570.9050.6850.816
    SFF73.72190.7240.8830.9170.7210.840
    JAM+SFF73.72190.8230.8860.9220.7400.849
    Table 2. Influence of single component of fusion module on object detection results
    MethodParameter quantity /106GFLOPsFPS /(frame·s-1mAP50
    PersonCarBicycleAll
    JAM+SFF-GAP73.72190.8230.8880.9190.7220.843
    JAM+DSFF74.23191.2210.8810.9120.7340.844
    JAM-ECA+SFF73.72190.8230.8910.9200.7250.845
    JAM+SFF73.72190.8230.8860.9220.7400.849
    Table 3. Influence of different component of fusion module on object detection results
    MethodBackboneDatamAP50
    PersonCarBicycleAll
    YOLOv5CSPDarkNetRGB0.5810.7810.4070.590
    YOLOv5CSPDarkNetThermal0.7910.8870.5380.739
    CFR25VGG16RGB+T0.7450.8490.5780.724
    GAFF27VGG16RGB+T0.727
    GAFF27ResNet18RGB+T0.729
    CFT28CSPDarkNetRGB+T0.8220.8900.6400.784
    ProbEn36ResNet101RGB+T0.8770.9010.7350.838
    YOLOBase(ours)CSPDarkNetRGB+T0.8640.9120.6520.809
    MAFFNet(ours)CSPDarkNetRGB+T0.8860.9220.7400.849
    Table 4. Performance comparison of different algorithms in FLIR dataset
    DataMethodDetectorParameter quantity /106GFLOPsFPS /(frame·s-1mAP50
    RGBYOLOv5YOLOv546.64114.6380.590
    ThermalYOLOv5YOLOv546.64114.6380.739
    RGB+TCFT28YOLOv5206.2613732.5140.784
    RGB+TProbEn36Faster R-CNN107.18339.3170.838
    RGB+TYOLOBase(ours)YOLOv576.47195.8250.809
    RGB+TMAFFNet(ours)YOLOv573.72190.8230.849
    Table 5. Comparison of complexity of various models
    MethodBackboneDatamAP50mAP75mAP
    YOLOv33DarkNetRGB0.8590.3790.433
    YOLOv33DarkNetThermal0.8970.5340.528
    YOLOv5CSPDarkNetRGB0.9080.5190.505
    YOLOv5CSPDarkNetThermal0.9460.7220.619
    CFT28CSPDarkNetRGB+T0.9750.7290.636
    CCIFNet37ResNet50RGB+T0.9760.7260.641
    MAFFNetCSPDarkNetRGB+T0.9770.7830.671
    Table 6. Performance comparison of different algorithms in LLVIP dataset
    Xiaoqiang Gao, Kan Chang, Mingyang Ling, Mengyu Yin. Object Detection via Multimodal Adaptive Feature Fusion[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(24): 2410003
    Download Citation