• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 40, Issue 2, 0201001 (2020)
Jianyu Li*, Yao Huang, Honghua Huang*, Wenyue Zhu, and Heli Wei
Author Affiliations
  • Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Optics, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, Anhui 230031, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202040.0201001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jianyu Li, Yao Huang, Honghua Huang, Wenyue Zhu, Heli Wei. Laser Atmospheric Transmittance Extraction Using Broadband Direct Solar Radiation Measurement[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(2): 0201001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Laser atmospheric transmittance as a function of precipitable water for several wavebands at several typical zones. (a) 0.02-nm bandwidth; (b) 12-nm bandwidth
    Fig. 1. Laser atmospheric transmittance as a function of precipitable water for several wavebands at several typical zones. (a) 0.02-nm bandwidth; (b) 12-nm bandwidth
    Ratio of narrowband transmittance to broadband transmittance as a function of precipitable water at several typical zones. (a) Korla; (b) Hefei; (c) Weining
    Fig. 2. Ratio of narrowband transmittance to broadband transmittance as a function of precipitable water at several typical zones. (a) Korla; (b) Hefei; (c) Weining
    Flow chart of calculation model of measurement method for extracting laser atmospheric transmittance
    Fig. 3. Flow chart of calculation model of measurement method for extracting laser atmospheric transmittance
    Comparison of transmittance measured by ISP-type near-infrared sun-photometer and POM02-type sun-photometer. (a) 0.87 μm; (b) 1.63 μm
    Fig. 4. Comparison of transmittance measured by ISP-type near-infrared sun-photometer and POM02-type sun-photometer. (a) 0.87 μm; (b) 1.63 μm
    Comparison of precipitable water measured by ISP-type near-infrared sun-photometer and POM02-type sun-photometer
    Fig. 5. Comparison of precipitable water measured by ISP-type near-infrared sun-photometer and POM02-type sun-photometer
    Comparisons of 1.315-μm transmittance extracted from 1.31-μm and 1.32-μm data. (a) Comparison results in september; (b) comparison results in winter; (c) relationship between 1.315-μm transmittance error and precipitable water
    Fig. 6. Comparisons of 1.315-μm transmittance extracted from 1.31-μm and 1.32-μm data. (a) Comparison results in september; (b) comparison results in winter; (c) relationship between 1.315-μm transmittance error and precipitable water
    Comparison of precipitable water reversed from 1.32-μm and 0.94-μm data
    Fig. 7. Comparison of precipitable water reversed from 1.32-μm and 0.94-μm data
    Comparison of 0.87-μm transmittance measured by ISP-type near-infrared sun-photometer and POM02-type sun-photometer. (a) Xinjiang, 20190909; (b) Xinjiang, 20190910; (c) Xinjiang, 20190917; (d) Xinjiang, 20190919
    Fig. 8. Comparison of 0.87-μm transmittance measured by ISP-type near-infrared sun-photometer and POM02-type sun-photometer. (a) Xinjiang, 20190909; (b) Xinjiang, 20190910; (c) Xinjiang, 20190917; (d) Xinjiang, 20190919
    Comparison of 1.63-μm transmittance measured by ISP-type near-infrared sun-photometer and POM02-type sun-photometer. (a) Xinjiang, 20190909; (b) Xinjiang, 20190910; (c) Xinjiang, 20190917; (d) Xinjiang, 20190919
    Fig. 9. Comparison of 1.63-μm transmittance measured by ISP-type near-infrared sun-photometer and POM02-type sun-photometer. (a) Xinjiang, 20190909; (b) Xinjiang, 20190910; (c) Xinjiang, 20190917; (d) Xinjiang, 20190919
    Comparison of precipitable water measured by ISP-type near-infrared sun-photometer and POM02-type sun-photometer. (a) Xinjiang, 20190909; (b) Xinjiang, 20190910; (c) Xinjiang, 20190917; (d) Xinjiang, 20190919
    Fig. 10. Comparison of precipitable water measured by ISP-type near-infrared sun-photometer and POM02-type sun-photometer. (a) Xinjiang, 20190909; (b) Xinjiang, 20190910; (c) Xinjiang, 20190917; (d) Xinjiang, 20190919
    Comparison of 1.315-μm transmittance extracted from 1.31-μm data measured by ISP-type near-infrared sun-photometer and result calculated by transmission software. (a) Xinjiang, 20190909; (b) Xinjiang, 20190910; (c) Xinjiang, 20190917; (d) Xinjiang, 20190919
    Fig. 11. Comparison of 1.315-μm transmittance extracted from 1.31-μm data measured by ISP-type near-infrared sun-photometer and result calculated by transmission software. (a) Xinjiang, 20190909; (b) Xinjiang, 20190910; (c) Xinjiang, 20190917; (d) Xinjiang, 20190919
    ParameterError /%
    2016090120160902201609072016091220160922
    0.87 μm transmittance1.150.930.911.241.43
    1.63 μm transmittance5.724.925.105.354.66
    Precipitable water1.940.954.485.266.88
    Table 1. Comparison of errors of transmittance and precipitable water measured by ISP-type near-infrared sun-photometer and POM02-type sun-photometer
    Jianyu Li, Yao Huang, Honghua Huang, Wenyue Zhu, Heli Wei. Laser Atmospheric Transmittance Extraction Using Broadband Direct Solar Radiation Measurement[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(2): 0201001
    Download Citation