• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 50, Issue 8, 0802207 (2023)
Sixue Ren1、2, Jingbin Li1、2、*, Yameng Shi1、2, Baoqin Wen1、2, Xianfei Wang1、2, and Liqiao Li1、2
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, Xinjiang, China
  • 2Industrial Technology Research Institute of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Shihezi 832000, Xinjiang, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL220806 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Sixue Ren, Jingbin Li, Yameng Shi, Baoqin Wen, Xianfei Wang, Liqiao Li. Effect of Process Parameters on Microstructure and Wear Resistance of 20CrMnTi-Based Laser Cladding Ni60A-TiC Coating[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2023, 50(8): 0802207 Copy Citation Text show less
    Morphologies of powders. (a) Ni60A powder; (b) TiC powder; (c) Ni60A-25%TiC composite powder
    Fig. 1. Morphologies of powders. (a) Ni60A powder; (b) TiC powder; (c) Ni60A-25%TiC composite powder
    Schematic of geometrical size of single-track cladding layer
    Fig. 2. Schematic of geometrical size of single-track cladding layer
    Sectional morphologies of samples after single-track cladding. (a) S1 sample; (b) S2 sample; (c) S3 sample; (d) S4 sample; (e) S5 sample; (f) S6 sample; (g) S7 sample; (h) S8 sample; (i) S9 sample
    Fig. 3. Sectional morphologies of samples after single-track cladding. (a) S1 sample; (b) S2 sample; (c) S3 sample; (d) S4 sample; (e) S5 sample; (f) S6 sample; (g) S7 sample; (h) S8 sample; (i) S9 sample
    XRD patterns of composite coating. (a) S3 and S5 coatings; (b) S7 and S8 coatings
    Fig. 4. XRD patterns of composite coating. (a) S3 and S5 coatings; (b) S7 and S8 coatings
    Friction coefficient curves, abrasion loss and wear rate of different samples. (a) S1 and S2 samples; (b) S3 and S4 samples; (c) S5 and S6 samples; (d) S7 and S8 samples; (e) S9 and S10 samples; (f) abrasion loss and wear rate
    Fig. 5. Friction coefficient curves, abrasion loss and wear rate of different samples. (a) S1 and S2 samples; (b) S3 and S4 samples; (c) S5 and S6 samples; (d) S7 and S8 samples; (e) S9 and S10 samples; (f) abrasion loss and wear rate
    Three-dimensional worn morphologies of different samples. (a) S1 sample; (b) S2 sample; (c) S3 sample; (d) S4 sample; (e) S5 sample; (f) S6 sample; (g) S7 sample; (h) S8 sample; (i) S9 sample; (j) S10 sample; (k) surface roughness and wear depth
    Fig. 6. Three-dimensional worn morphologies of different samples. (a) S1 sample; (b) S2 sample; (c) S3 sample; (d) S4 sample; (e) S5 sample; (f) S6 sample; (g) S7 sample; (h) S8 sample; (i) S9 sample; (j) S10 sample; (k) surface roughness and wear depth
    Microscopic morphologies of worn surface of different samples. (a) S1 sample; (b) S2 sample; (c) S3 sample; (d) S4 sample; (e) S5 sample; (f) S6 sample; (g) S7 sample; (h) S8 sample; (i) S9 sample; (j) S10 sample
    Fig. 7. Microscopic morphologies of worn surface of different samples. (a) S1 sample; (b) S2 sample; (c) S3 sample; (d) S4 sample; (e) S5 sample; (f) S6 sample; (g) S7 sample; (h) S8 sample; (i) S9 sample; (j) S10 sample
    EDS analysis of worn surface. (a) S3 sample; (b) S10 sample
    Fig. 8. EDS analysis of worn surface. (a) S3 sample; (b) S10 sample
    Cross-sectional EDS analysis of S3 sample
    Fig. 9. Cross-sectional EDS analysis of S3 sample
    XPS analysis of S3 sample
    Fig. 10. XPS analysis of S3 sample
    ElementMass fraction /%
    20CrMnTiNi60A
    C0.17-0.230.6-1.0
    Si0.17-0.373.0-4.5
    Mn0.80-1.10
    Cr1.00-1.3014-17
    Ti0.04-0.10
    B2.5-4.5
    Fe≤5
    NiBal.
    Table 1. Chemical composition of 20CrMnTi substrate and Ni60A powder
    LevelLaserpower /kWScanningspeed /(mm·s-1Power feeding rate /(g·min-1
    Factor AFactor BFactor C
    11.4515
    21.6618
    31.8721
    Table 2. Factors and levels of orthogonal experiment
    SampleMicrohardness /HV
    S11225
    S2996
    S31252
    S41067
    S51105
    S61156
    S71157
    S81031
    S91071
    Table 3. Microhardness of cladding layer surface
    Dilution rateScore
    6%-20%100-92
    21%-25%90-82
    26%-30%80-72
    31%-35%70-62
    36%-40%60-52
    41%-45%50-42
    46%-50%40-32
    51%-55%30-22
    56%-60%20-12
    61%-65%10-2
    0%-6%0-100
    Table 4. Dilution rate score table
    Average microhardness /HVScore
    1335-1300100-90
    1300-126590-80
    1265-123080-70
    1230-119570-60
    1195-116060-50
    1160-112550-40
    1125-109040-30
    1090-105530-20
    1055-102020-10
    1020-98510-0
    Table 5. Microhardness score table
    No.SampleFactorResponse valueComprehensive score
    ABCDilution rate /%Microhardness /HV
    1S11(1.4)1(5)1(15)41.31225142.74
    2S21(1.4)2(6)2(18)43.899672.47
    3S31(1.4)3(7)3(21)21.51252150.93
    4S42(1.6)1(5)2(18)46.0106794.43
    5S52(1.6)2(6)3(21)43.01105106.12
    6S62(1.6)3(7)1(15)54.41156121.74
    7S73(1.8)1(5)3(21)45.31157122.02
    8S83(1.8)2(6)1(15)62.4103183.29
    9S93(1.8)3(7)2(18)50.8107196.60
    K1122.05119.73115.92
    K2107.4387.2987.83
    K3100.64123.09126.36
    R21.4135.8038.52
    Table 6. L9(33) orthogonal test results and analysis
    SourceDegree of freedomSum of squares of deviationsMean square
    Error2143.571.73
    A2718.2359.09
    B22344.81172.41
    C22381.91190.97
    Table 7. Analysis of variance of comprehensive score
    Sixue Ren, Jingbin Li, Yameng Shi, Baoqin Wen, Xianfei Wang, Liqiao Li. Effect of Process Parameters on Microstructure and Wear Resistance of 20CrMnTi-Based Laser Cladding Ni60A-TiC Coating[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2023, 50(8): 0802207
    Download Citation