• Infrared and Laser Engineering
  • Vol. 51, Issue 5, 20210303 (2022)
Yufei Zhang, Zikun Wang, Weidong Hu, Fengli Niu, and Yongwei Zhu
Author Affiliations
  • College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20210303 Cite this Article
    Yufei Zhang, Zikun Wang, Weidong Hu, Fengli Niu, Yongwei Zhu. Prediction analysis of subsurface damage of work-part ZnS in fixed abrasive lapping[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2022, 51(5): 20210303 Copy Citation Text show less
    DEM model for fixed abrasive lapping
    Fig. 1. DEM model for fixed abrasive lapping
    Polished workpiece
    Fig. 2. Polished workpiece
    Schematic diagram of angle polishing
    Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of angle polishing
    (a) Profile curve of polished slope; (b) Curve after fitting
    Fig. 4. (a) Profile curve of polished slope; (b) Curve after fitting
    Simulation results of subsurface microcracks with different particle sizes: (a) W5; (b) W15; (c) W25; (d) W30
    Fig. 5. Simulation results of subsurface microcracks with different particle sizes: (a) W5; (b) W15; (c) W25; (d) W30
    Subsurface microcracks at different depths after W25 abrasive grain processing: (a) 0 μm; (b) 2.30 μm; (c) 3.04 μm; (d) 3.57 μm; (c) 4.39 μm; (d) 6.27 μm
    Fig. 6. Subsurface microcracks at different depths after W25 abrasive grain processing: (a) 0 μm; (b) 2.30 μm; (c) 3.04 μm; (d) 3.57 μm; (c) 4.39 μm; (d) 6.27 μm
    Microscopic observation of microcrack end point: (a) W5; (b) W15; (c) W30
    Fig. 7. Microscopic observation of microcrack end point: (a) W5; (b) W15; (c) W30
    Schematic diagram of subsurface damage during grinding
    Fig. 8. Schematic diagram of subsurface damage during grinding
    Comparison of simulated and measured depth of microcrack layer
    Fig. 9. Comparison of simulated and measured depth of microcrack layer
    $E/{\rm{GPa}}$υ$ {\sigma }_{b}/{\rm{MPa} } $$ {\sigma }_{bb}/{\rm{MPa } } $
    Actual parameters85.50.2750.0103.0
    Model parameter89.20.2849.1110.5
    Table 1. Actual value and two-dimensional model value of material property parameters
    $ \eta $$ {\lambda }_{0} $${E}^{\mathrm{*} }/{\rm{GPa }}$
    0.120.441.085
    Table 2. Preparation parameters of consolidated abrasive pad
    Particle size/μmAverage cutting depth/nm
    598.2
    15294.7
    25491.1
    30589.3
    Table 3. Average cutting depth corresponding to different diamond particle sizes
    Load/ kPa Rotate speed of pad/r·min−1Rotate speed of workpiece/r·min−1Lapping time/ min
    2085803
    Table 4. Processing parameters of Zinc sulfide
    Polishing padPolyurethaneFlannelette
    Pressure/kPa1010
    Rotate speed of pad/r·min−18585
    Rotate speed of workpiece/r·min−18080
    Polishing time/min1040
    Table 5. Process parameters of angle polishing
    Yufei Zhang, Zikun Wang, Weidong Hu, Fengli Niu, Yongwei Zhu. Prediction analysis of subsurface damage of work-part ZnS in fixed abrasive lapping[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2022, 51(5): 20210303
    Download Citation