Fig. 1. Rectangular diagram
Fig. 2. Function image of similar slope
Fig. 3. Function image of similar length
Fig. 4. Function image of orthogonality
Fig. 5. Function image of center position relationship
Fig. 6. Selection of ring regions
Fig. 7. Results of composite image and rectangle detection. (a) Composite image 1; (b) composite image 2; (c) detection result of composite image 1; (d) detection result of composite image 2
Fig. 8. Detection results of rectangular part 1 by different algorithms. (a) Rectangular part 1; (b) Ref. [2]; (c) proposed algorithm
Fig. 9. Detection results of rectangular part 2 by different algorithms. (a) Rectangular part 2; (b) Ref. [2]; (c) proposed algorithm
Fig. 10. Detection results of rectangular part 3 by different algorithms. (a) Rectangular part 3; (b) Ref. [8]; (c) proposed algorithm
Image | Imagesize /(pixel×pixel) | Timeconsuming /ms | Number ofrectanglesobtained |
---|
Synthetic image 1 | 404×570 | 16 | 6 | Synthetic image 2 | 782×512 | 92 | 8 |
|
Table 1. Comparison of detection results of composite images
Result | Ref. [2] | Proposed algorithm | Actual information |
---|
Image size /(pixel×pixel) | 3072×2048 | 3072×2048 | | Time /ms | 2600 | 352 | | Center coordinates of 1st rectangle | (214.000,476.000) | (213.507,474.272) | (213.000,474.000) | Length /pixel | 145.278 | 145.729 | 145.000 | Width /pixel | 129.817 | 131.833 | 131.000 | Inclination /(°) | 5.962 | 5.916 | 6.000 | Center coordinates of 2nd rectangle | (233.000,314.000) | (232.308,313.049) | (232.000,313.000) | Length /pixel | 76.038 | 79.723 | 79.000 | Width /pixel | 60.373 | 66.159 | 65.000 | Inclination /(°) | -29.620 | -29.144 | -29.000 | Center coordinates of 3rd rectangle | (361.000,505.000) | (359.962,505.074) | (360.000,505.000) | Length /pixel | 125.536 | 129.721 | 128.000 | Width /pixel | 73.176 | 79.119 | 78.000 | Inclination /(°) | 22.680 | 22.504 | 22.000 | Center coordinates of 4th rectangle | (395.000,373.000) | (394.437,373.050) | (394,373) | Length /pixel | 123.136 | 142.962 | 142.000 | Width /pixel | 111.945 | 135.127 | 133.000 | Inclination /(°) | 37.380 | 34.485 | 34.000 |
|
Table 2. Comparison of detection results of proposed algorithm and Ref. [2]