
- Chinese Optics Letters
- Vol. 23, Issue 6, 060603 (2025)
Abstract
Keywords
1. Introduction
Optical wireless communication (OWC) has gained importance due to its high data rate, high security, and strong immunity to electromagnetic interference, making it ideal for both free-space optics (FSO) and underwater wireless optical communication (UWOC) systems[1–3]. Optical beam steering (OBS), a crucial component of OWC, is divided into mechanical and non-mechanical techniques. Mechanical techniques[4], such as micro-electromechanical systems, rotating prisms, rotating mirrors, polygons, and digital micro-mirror devices (DMDs), rely on moving parts but are limited in speed, precision, reliability, and size. However, non-mechanical techniques[5,6], such as optical phased arrays (OPAs), liquid-crystal (LC) micro-lenses, acousto-optic deflectors (AODs), polarized gratings, metasurfaces, and liquid prisms (LPs) offer enhanced performance by eliminating moving parts, making them a critical focus in OWC research[6,7].
For instance, LC micro-lenses using the electro-optic effect achieved a maximum diagonal steering angle of
Magnetic fields have been widely studied for manipulating liquid droplets. Various droplet manipulation techniques have been developed under the influence of magnetic fields, such as droplet generation, deformation, transportation, sorting, coalescence, splitting, and levitation[14]. Advances such as reconfigurable magnetic liquid metal robots allow simultaneous manipulation of multiple droplets[15], while soft magnetic carpets dynamically control droplets by switching surface states between sticky and slippery under a magnetic field[16]. Salts such as manganese chloride (
Sign up for Chinese Optics Letters TOC. Get the latest issue of Chinese Optics Letters delivered right to you!Sign up now
Magnetic actuation utilizes external magnetic fields to control motion in materials like paramagnetic liquids, which exhibit positive magnetic susceptibility (
Recent studies in paramagnetic materials, which exhibit magnetic properties when exposed to magnetic fields, represent significant breakthroughs in scientific and industrial applications. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to experimentally demonstrate OBS using paramagnetic salts in the OWC domain under varied conditions. It showcases the potential of field forces like magnetic actuation to achieve beam steering without internal mechanical components. Such magnetic field-based technologies offer promise for precise control and rapid response time, advancing compact, energy-efficient OWC systems for FSO and UWOC.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Paramagnetic materials
In this study, manganese chloride (
Each chemical was prepared as an aqueous solution and subjected to controlled magnetic fields to evaluate their effectiveness in OBS, focusing on the role of paramagnetic materials in advanced optical technologies. Stock solutions of manganese chloride, manganese nitrate, manganese sulfate, dysprosium nitrate, and gadolinium nitrate were prepared by dissolving the respective chemicals in deionized water (5 ml) until a saturated solution was achieved. The concentrations of these stock solutions are given in Table 1, which ensures consistency across experiments. Subsequently, another set of dysprosium nitrate solutions was prepared in 5 ml of deionized water to examine the effect of varying concentrations on the beam steering angle, as shown in Table 2.
Sr no. | Paramagnetic salt | Deionized water (ml) | Added chemical wt. (g) | Ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|
MnCl2 | 5 | 3.8283 | 1:0.766 | |
MnSO4 | 5 | 2.6400 | 1:0.528 | |
Mn(NO3)2 | 5 | 6.2974 | 1:1.259 | |
Gd(NO3)3 | 5 | 5.3365 | 1:1.120 | |
Dy(NO3)3 | 5 | 5.5986 | 1:1.067 |
Table 1. The Concentrations of These Stock Solutions
Sr no. | Deionized water (ml) | Added chemical wt. (g) | Ratio |
---|---|---|---|
5 | 1.3997 | 1:0.2799 | |
5 | 2.7993 | 1:0.5597 | |
5 | 4.1990 | 1:0.8398 | |
5 | 5.5986 | 1:1.1200 |
Table 2. The Concentrations of Dysprosium Nitrate Solutions
2.2. Hydrophobic materials
In this study, we utilized polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), a synthetic fluoropolymer of tetrafluoroethylene, specifically AF Teflon (6% 1601x, DuPont), which is chosen for its exceptional hydrophobic characteristics and high optical transparency. Additionally, it provides a low surface energy coating, which improves the durability of devices by minimizing defect formation.
2.3. Fabrication process
A cylindrical tube of quartz glass with an inner diameter of 10 mm, a wall thickness of 1 mm, and a height of 10 mm was used as the base for fabricating the paramagnetic LP, and a 2 mm flat glass sheet was secured at the bottom using a UV-curable adhesive. The LP was first cleaned with acetone and dried before being coated with a 6% AF Teflon solution to create a thin hydrophobic layer using the dip-coating method, ensuring uniform coating. The Teflon coating was cured by initially heating the prism at 115°C for 16 h, then increasing the temperature to 140°C for 3 h, and finally heating it at 170°C for 10 min. The LP was then filled with concentrated stock solutions, as outlined in Table 1 and Table 2, along with ethyl acetate. To finalize the sealed prism assembly, a second glass slide was attached to the top of the prism. We chose ethyl acetate as the second liquid because it does not mix with water due to its difference in polarity. Additionally, ethyl acetate has a lower density (
3. Experimental Setup
Figure 1(a) shows the schematic diagram of the experimental setup for OBS using a paramagnetic liquid prism (PMLP) for an OWC system, comprising a transmitter, an optical channel, and a receiver. Figure 1(b) presents photographs and detailed configurations of a transmitter, a 2 m water tank, and a receiver setup for FSO and UWOC links.
Figure 1.(a) The schematic diagram of the experimental setup for OBS using a paramagnetic liquid prism. (b) Photographs of a transmitter, a 2 m water tank, and a receiver for FSO and UWOC links.
The experimental setup features a commercially available 520 nm single-mode fiber-pigtailed laser diode (LD) (LP520-SF17, Thorlabs), chosen for its narrow beam profile and high modulation bandwidth. The LD is mounted in an LDM9LP LD/TEC mount (Thorlabs) and controlled by an LD/TEC driver (ITC4020, Thorlabs). The system’s transmission performance was evaluated using the non-return-to-zero on–off keying (NRZ-OOK) modulation scheme, via a bit error rate tester (BERT, MP2100B), which generated a pseudo-random binary sequence with a pattern length of to modulate the LD. In this proof-of-concept experiment, the OBS was controlled using a PMLP, which was actuated by a permanent magnet due to the lack of a proper electromagnet. The frequency response was characterized using a network analyzer (Hewlett Packard 8753D). At the receiver, the optical signal was initially collimated by a 72 mm diameter spherical lens before passing through an optical variable attenuator, followed by a 1 GHz silicon avalanche photodiode (APD210, Thorlabs). Output power measurements were conducted using a power meter (PM100D, Thorlabs).
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Beam steering
Figures 2(a)–2(e) show the effect of an external magnetic field on various paramagnetic chemicals, including manganese chloride, manganese sulfate, manganese nitrate, gadolinium nitrate, and dysprosium nitrate. The lateral displacement of the optical beam spot was recorded using a graph paper on a linear scale. To convert this linear displacement into an angular value, the trigonometric relation
Figure 2.Front-facing images depict the behavior of the paramagnetic liquid in response to an external magnetic field. (a)–(e) Effect of an external magnetic field on various paramagnetic chemicals. (f)–(i) Impact of the magnetic field on different concentrations of dysprosium nitrate. The label X0 represents the liquid’s orientation in the absence of any magnetic field. In contrast, +X and −X illustrate the liquid’s orientation when subjected to a magnetic field, with +X showing steering toward the right side of the prism and −X showing steering toward the left.
The experiment aimed to determine which paramagnetic chemical exhibited the highest OBS angle when exposed to an external magnetic field. The beam steering angle was then determined along the
Sr no. | Paramagnetic chemical | −X | +X | −Y | +Y |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MnCl2 | −0.6 | 0.5 | −0.5 | 0.6 | |
MnSO4 | −0.5 | 0.4 | −0.5 | 0.5 | |
Mn(NO3)2 | −1.0 | 1.1 | −1.1 | 1.0 | |
Gd(NO3)3 | −0.6 | 0.6 | −0.5 | 0.6 | |
Dy(NO3)3 | −1.2 | 1.1 | −1.2 | 1.1 |
Table 3. Observed OBS Along the ±
To convert the angle
The observed beam steering angles in Fig. 3(a) for varying concentrations of dysprosium nitrate under the influence of an external magnetic field show a clear increase of beam displacement with higher concentrations. Figure 3(a) shows a decrease in optical intensity versus the concentration of
Figure 3.(a) Beam steering angles and received optical intensities for different concentrations of dysprosium nitrate. (b) Percentage of power loss in the empty prism and paramagnetic chemicals compared to the direct output power of the LD.
As shown in Fig. 3(b),
At the lowest concentration, a beam steering angle of
Based on the results in Table 3, dysprosium nitrate exhibited the highest beam steering in an external magnetic field. Therefore, it was selected for further experimental analysis in the optical communication link. Figure 4(a) shows the maximum displacement of the optical beam spot observed at various
XY denotation | Maximum beam steering observed | XY location (FSO) | XY location (UWOC) |
---|---|---|---|
0.0, 0.0 | 0.0, 0.0 | 0.0, 0.0 | |
1.2, 0.0 | 0.6, 0.0 | 0.5, 0.0 | |
0.85, 0.85 | 0.42, 0.42 | 0.39, 0.39 | |
0.0, 1.1 | 0.0, 0.6 | 0.0, 0.5 | |
−0.85, 0.85 | −0.42, 0.42 | −0.39, 0.39 | |
−1.2, 0.0 | −0.6, 0.0 | −0.5, 0.0 | |
−0.85, −0.85 | −0.42, −0.42 | −0.39, −0.39 | |
0.0, −1.2 | 0.0, −0.6 | 0.0, −0.5 | |
0.78, −0.78 | 0.42, −0.42 | 0.39, −0.39 |
Table 4. Beam Spot Location for the Measurements of the OWC Links (Cartesian Coordinates)
Ref. | Technique | Angle | Data rate | Remark |
---|---|---|---|---|
[ | OPA | 17° | 10 Gbps | OBS and OWC |
[ | LC micro-lens | ±3.42° | NA | OBS |
[ | Polarized grating | 32.1° | NA | OBS |
[ | APD | 18° | 1.8 Gbps | LiDAR |
[ | Metasurface | 70° | NA | |
[ | EWOD | 14.82° | 1.9 Gbps | OBS and OWC |
This study | Magnetic actuation | 5.98° along the ±X axes and 5.73° along the ±Y axes | 2.1 Gbps (FSO) and 1.9 Gbps (UWOC) | OBS and OWC |
Table 5. Previously Reported Studies on Various Non-Mechanical Beam-Steering Techniques
Figure 4.(a) A schematic illustration of the optical beam spot on the XY plane, showing the beam spot configurations used in optical communication measurements. (b) Optical beam spot measurements along the X and Y axes.
4.2. Optical wireless communication
The P-I and V-I output characteristics of the LD are presented in the inset of Fig. 5. Figure 5 illustrates the frequency response of the LD-APD back-to-back system without the PMLP, along with the PMLP-based FSO communication system and the PMLP-based UWOC system. The crosstalk ratio was calculated to be 0.41%, and the insertion loss was found to be 2.27 dB, indicating efficient optical power transmission with minimal interference.
Figure 5.Frequency responses of the LD-APD back-to-back system, LP-based FSO communication system, and LP-based UWOC system. The inset presents the P-I and V-I curves of the 520 nm pigtail LD.
The frequency response analysis indicates that the maximum 3 dB bandwidths for the LD, FSO, and UWOC links stabilize at 1039, 1022, and 1014 MHz, respectively, at 70 mA. Furthermore, the optical transmission link capacity of the proposed LP-based beam steering system is investigated using NRZ-OOK modulation over a transmission distance of 2 m in both free-space and underwater environments.
Figures 6 and 7 illustrate the FSO and UWOC links using PMLP in a 2D plane, respectively, with beam steering angles outlined in Table 4. Figure 6 shows the data rate and bit error rate (BER) for each
Figure 6.(a) Measured BER of the FSO communication link in the 2D plane, and (b) corresponding eye diagrams at various XY locations for data rates of 1.0 and 2.1 Gbps.
Figure 7.(a) Measured BER of the UWOC link in the 2D plane, and (b) corresponding eye diagrams at various XY locations for data rates of 1.0 and 1.9 Gbps.
5. Conclusion
This study introduces an innovative approach for OBS in OWC systems using paramagnetic liquids, with a focus on dysprosium nitrate for its strong paramagnetic properties. Experimental results demonstrated that dysprosium nitrate achieved the highest beam displacement (
References
[5] P. F. McManamon. A review of non mechanical beam steering options. LEOS 2008-21st Annual Meeting of the IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society, 575(2008).
[21] S. Laurent, C. Henoumont, D. Stanicki et al. Paramagnetic gadolinium complexes. MRI Contrast Agents: From Molecules to Particles, 23(2017).
[22] W. D. Callister, D. G. Rethwisch. Materials Science and Engineering: an Introduction(2020).

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address