• Geographical Research
  • Vol. 39, Issue 9, 2148 (2020)
Fuyuan WANG1、3, Kaiyong WANG1、3、*, Hu YU1、3, and Tian CHEN1、2、3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
  • 2Institute of Strategy Research for Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao Greater Bay Area, Guangzhou 510070, China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020200376 Cite this Article
    Fuyuan WANG, Kaiyong WANG, Hu YU, Tian CHEN. Spatial differentiation and correlative factors of ecological recreation space distribution in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration[J]. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(9): 2148 Copy Citation Text show less
    The visual interpretation process of Xiqiao Mountain national forest park
    Fig. 1. The visual interpretation process of Xiqiao Mountain national forest park
    Kernel density of ecological recreation space in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration
    Fig. 2. Kernel density of ecological recreation space in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration
    Recreational utilization rate of ecological space in each city in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration
    Fig. 3. Recreational utilization rate of ecological space in each city in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration
    Spatial agglomeration characteristics of the ecological recreation space in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration
    Fig. 4. Spatial agglomeration characteristics of the ecological recreation space in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration
    Distribution of ecological recreational spaces within 1-10 km buffer zone along the river
    Fig. 5. Distribution of ecological recreational spaces within 1-10 km buffer zone along the river
    Spatial relationship of ecological recreation space and elevation, altitude in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration
    Fig. 6. Spatial relationship of ecological recreation space and elevation, altitude in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration
    Spatial difference of per capita area of ecological recreation space in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration
    Fig. 7. Spatial difference of per capita area of ecological recreation space in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration
    The spatial relationship of ecological recreation space and tourism elements in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration
    Fig. 8. The spatial relationship of ecological recreation space and tourism elements in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration
    The governance structure of ecological recreation space in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration
    Fig. 9. The governance structure of ecological recreation space in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration
    大类具体类型属性信息来源获取信息的等级属性
    生态游憩空间森林公园包含县级至国家级4个等级,名录、面积和等级信息从原广东省林业厅官方网站获得国家级、省级、市级和县级
    湿地公园包含县级至国家级4个等级,名称、面积和等级信息通过申请原广东省林业厅政府信息公开获得国家级、省级、市级和县级
    风景名胜区有国家级、省级两个等级,名称和等级从《广东省风景名胜区体系规划(2015—2030)》获得国家级、省级
    水利风景区包含国家级、省级两个等级,缺乏省级数据,仅从水利部官方网站获得国家级水利风景区名录,其面积经由网络搜索获得国家级
    地质公园包含国家级和省级两级,名录、面积和等级信息通过向原广东省国土资源厅申请信息公开获得国家级、省级
    生态型景区名录和等级信息来自广东省旅游局官方网站[34],面积同样通过网络搜索整理5A、4A、3A、2A
    城市公园名录、面积和等级信息通过网络和谷歌地图综合整理城市综合公园和专类公园
    其他地理数据公路网根据15级的谷歌影像图,对区域内公路进行数字化处理,建立城乡道路网Shapefile图层高速公路、国道、省道、县道
    水系、高程和坡度水系根据城市群自然地理地图数字化得来。90 m空间分辨率的珠三角城市群的高程和坡度栅格图下载自地理空间数据云
    人口人口数据方面,从最近的一次人口普查中获取乡镇街道人口数据的做法,被国内外研究所采用[18, 35],因而本文的乡镇街道(含少数开发区、林场和管委会管辖区)人口数据来自广东省2010年人口普查分乡、镇、街道资料[36],共计611个人口统计单元。借助广东省乡镇街道地图,对乡镇街道边界进行数字化,然后将人口属性赋予每个乡镇街道,得到乡镇街道人口分布矢量图乡镇级
    旅游要素POI旅游要素分为住宿、购物、餐饮和休闲娱乐四类,数据为BIGEMAP地图下载器提取的POI(Point of Interest),其中购物点414404个,休闲娱乐点77938个,住宿点21088个,餐饮点113773个
    文化资源根据数据可得性,选取省级以上文物保护单位作为文化资源,考察其与生态游憩空间的空间关系。省级文物保护单位名称与地理位置信息来源于网络公开发布的广东省第1-8批省级文物保护单位名录,总计299项。全国重点文物保护单位来源于国家文物局网站公布的第1~7批全国重点文物保护单位名录,总计62项[37]。通过查询361个文化资源点的经纬度信息,对其进行空间定位,建立点状矢量数据集国家级、省级
    Table 1. Main data sources
    Fuyuan WANG, Kaiyong WANG, Hu YU, Tian CHEN. Spatial differentiation and correlative factors of ecological recreation space distribution in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration[J]. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(9): 2148
    Download Citation