• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 59, Issue 18, 1817003 (2022)
Yuanlu Li1、2、*, Xiangke Shi1, and Kun Li1
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Automation, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu , China
  • 2Jiangsu Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology Collaborative Innovation Center, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu , China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202259.1817003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yuanlu Li, Xiangke Shi, Kun Li. Adaptive Feature Recombination Recalibration Algorithm for Hepatic Vascular Segmentation[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(18): 1817003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Overall structure of the improved model
    Fig. 1. Overall structure of the improved model
    RR block. (a) Overall structure, the residual block is nested with the recombination block, and the recombination block is nested within the SegSE block; (b) structure of the recombination block; (c) structure of the recalibration block; (d) structure of the residual block
    Fig. 2. RR block. (a) Overall structure, the residual block is nested with the recombination block, and the recombination block is nested within the SegSE block; (b) structure of the recombination block; (c) structure of the recalibration block; (d) structure of the residual block
    Module structure. (a) SE module; (b) recalibration module
    Fig. 3. Module structure. (a) SE module; (b) recalibration module
    Attention mechanism structure
    Fig. 4. Attention mechanism structure
    Flow chart of pretreatment
    Fig. 5. Flow chart of pretreatment
    Broken line diagram of the influence of RR block on the model. (a) Dice Score; (b) Sensitivity
    Fig. 6. Broken line diagram of the influence of RR block on the model. (a) Dice Score; (b) Sensitivity
    Segmentation results. (a) CT original image; (b) gold standard; (c) prediction result; (d) comparison between gold standard and prediction result
    Fig. 7. Segmentation results. (a) CT original image; (b) gold standard; (c) prediction result; (d) comparison between gold standard and prediction result
    Three-dimensional diagram of segmentation results, the left side of each image is the prediction result, and the right side is the comparison between the segmentation result and the real annotation. (a) MPUNet; (b) nnU-Net; (c) Spider UNet; (d) proposed method
    Fig. 8. Three-dimensional diagram of segmentation results, the left side of each image is the prediction result, and the right side is the comparison between the segmentation result and the real annotation. (a) MPUNet; (b) nnU-Net; (c) Spider UNet; (d) proposed method
    ModuleChannelDice /%Sen /%Spe /%Acc /%
    +RR block[48,64]60.8367.9797.9298.34
    [48,64,96]63.9569.7298.9399.12
    [48,64,96,144]61.4371.3298.8598.91
    [48,64,96,144,192]55.9767.9297.7397.87
    -RR block[48,96]30.1333.1193.2493.63
    [48,96,128]37.2148.6594.4395.12
    [48,96,128,256]41.2251.2395.5396.14
    [48,96,128,256,512]33.8541.9194.2194.95
    Table 1. Quantitative analysis of the influence of the RR block on the model
    LossAttentionRR blockDice /%Sen /%Spe /%Acc /%
    Tversky Loss41.2251.2395.5396.14
    +42.2152.3396.1197.34
    +63.9569.7298.9399.12
    ++64.8070.5199.1299.23
    GD Loss40.2252.3195.2296.81
    +41.9553.6396.6197.53
    +62.5371.8198.6098.82
    ++63.7273.1599.3199.10
    Table 2. Influence of each block and loss function on the model
    ModelYearDice Score
    MPUNet19201959.00
    UMCT20202063.00
    nnU-Net21201963.00
    Spider UNet22202145.60
    C2FNAS-Panc23202064.30
    Proposed model64.80
    Table 3. Segmentation effect of different models
    Yuanlu Li, Xiangke Shi, Kun Li. Adaptive Feature Recombination Recalibration Algorithm for Hepatic Vascular Segmentation[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(18): 1817003
    Download Citation