• Infrared and Laser Engineering
  • Vol. 53, Issue 3, 20230611 (2024)
Fubing Li, Qi You, Junmin Leng, and Linhao Yang
Author Affiliations
  • School of Information and Communication Engineering, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 102206, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20230611 Cite this Article
    Fubing Li, Qi You, Junmin Leng, Linhao Yang. Fast calculation of radiative heat transfer coefficient between diffuse and non-diffuse surfaces[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2024, 53(3): 20230611 Copy Citation Text show less
    Monte-Carlo method for calculating radiative heat transfer coefficient
    Fig. 1. Monte-Carlo method for calculating radiative heat transfer coefficient
    (a) The representation of reflected light by diffuse surface in Monte-Carlo method; (b) Fast method
    Fig. 2. (a) The representation of reflected light by diffuse surface in Monte-Carlo method; (b) Fast method
    Fast calculation method for calculating the radiative heat transfer coefficient of non-diffuse surface element i
    Fig. 3. Fast calculation method for calculating the radiative heat transfer coefficient of non-diffuse surface element i
    (a) Illustration of 3D geometry model and its surface ID; (b) Illustration of random positions and direction vectors for emitted rays
    Fig. 4. (a) Illustration of 3D geometry model and its surface ID; (b) Illustration of random positions and direction vectors for emitted rays
    Fast calculation of radiative heat transfer coefficient for model with diffuse and specular surfaces
    Fig. 5. Fast calculation of radiative heat transfer coefficient for model with diffuse and specular surfaces
    (a) Comparison of computational time between Monte-Carlo method and Fast method when the inner surface reflectivity of the cube is ρ=0.4; (b) ρ=0.8
    Fig. 6. (a) Comparison of computational time between Monte-Carlo method and Fast method when the inner surface reflectivity of the cube is ρ=0.4; (b) ρ=0.8
    L-shape unenclosed cavity model
    Fig. 7. L-shape unenclosed cavity model
    (a) Comparison of computational time between Monte-Carlo method and Fast method when the inner surface reflectivity of the L-shape cavity is ρ=0.4; (b) ρ=0.8
    Fig. 8. (a) Comparison of computational time between Monte-Carlo method and Fast method when the inner surface reflectivity of the L-shape cavity is ρ=0.4; (b) ρ=0.8
    Illustration of the average number of ray-tracing times
    Fig. 9. Illustration of the average number of ray-tracing times
    Facet1(AA'B'B)2(BB'C'C)3(CC'D'D)4(DD'A'A)5(A'B'C'D')6(ABCD)Integrality
    10.058970.179170.217410.181310.181320.181160.99934
    20.179560.059240.180510.218500.180320.181220.99934
    30.217760.181200.048880.185940.183070.182490.99934
    40.182010.216470.187500.049360.181900.182120.99934
    50.179210.179740.182200.183330.070490.204370.99934
    60.178720.179260.182740.182130.205450.071050.99934
    Table 1. Radiative heat transfer coefficient for the inner surfaces of the cube (Monte-Carlo method)
    Facet1(AA'B'B)2(BB'C'C)3(CC'D'D)4(DD'A'A)5(A'B'C'D')6(ABCD)IntegralityMAE
    10.059370.180570.218590.182220.178860.179750.999341.29227‰
    20.180680.059720.181350.218840.179030.179720.999340.93054‰
    30.221360.180100.046690.186310.182140.183240.999851.48970‰
    40.182180.220240.186360.046880.180980.183230.999851.59877‰
    50.179330.181430.181790.183290.065660.208340.999851.84531‰
    60.181790.180120.183010.181450.207770.065700.999852.09184‰
    Table 2. Radiative heat transfer coefficient for the inner surfaces of the cube (Fast method)
    Facetρ=0.4ρ=0.8
    MAEIntegralityMAEIntegrality
    11.11640‰0.985940.61132‰0.85933
    21.29494‰0.946562.29617‰0.77797
    30.55498‰0.796051.91049‰0.64609
    41.19067‰0.792901.34883‰0.64261
    56.59430‰0.974104.82850‰0.80405
    60.98649‰0.989100.64184‰0.85692
    70.64990‰0.931600.56992‰0.76133
    81.33612‰0.653591.32864‰0.41103
    95.29473‰0.944015.60488‰0.77703
    101.45282‰0.792861.44651‰0.65081
    111.03800‰0.792721.53688‰0.64366
    122.62882‰0.944943.66704‰0.77457
    135.80383‰0.984134.92681‰0.84846
    Table 3. MAE and integrality of radiative heat transfer coefficient for L-shape cavity model (Fast method)
    ρCd
    1/62/63/64/65/6
    0.10.8130.6530.5200.4130.333
    0.20.6720.4610.3300.2500.200
    0.30.6150.3970.2770.2080.167
    0.40.5200.3070.2080.1560.125
    0.50.4460.2480.1670.1250.100
    0.60.3410.1780.1190.0890.071
    0.70.2470.1250.0830.0630.050
    0.80.1610.0810.0540.0400.032
    0.90.0760.0380.0250.0190.015
    Table 4. Ratio of average-tracking-times for a single ray emitted from the non-diffuse surface calculated with Fast method compared to Monte-Carlo method
    ρCd
    1/62/63/64/65/6
    0.10.8440.7690.7600.8040.889
    0.20.7270.6410.6650.7500.867
    0.30.6790.5980.6380.7360.861
    0.40.6000.5380.6040.7190.854
    0.50.5390.4990.5830.7080.850
    0.60.4510.4520.5600.6960.845
    0.70.3730.4170.5420.6880.842
    0.80.3010.3870.5270.6800.839
    0.90.2300.3590.5130.6730.836
    Table 5. Ratio of consumed time for all the surfaces using Fast method compared with Monte-Carlo method
    Cd1/62/63/64/65/6
    Theoretical0.3010.3870.5270.6800.839
    Measured0.3310.3840.5240.6950.846
    Table 6. Theoretical and measured values of the computation time ratio between Fast method and Monte-Carlo method when ρ=0.8
    Fubing Li, Qi You, Junmin Leng, Linhao Yang. Fast calculation of radiative heat transfer coefficient between diffuse and non-diffuse surfaces[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2024, 53(3): 20230611
    Download Citation