Author Affiliations
1School of Optoelectronic Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, Jilin, China2National Defense Key Discipline Laboratory of Air-Ground Laser Communication, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, Jilin, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Block diagram of turntable servo system
Fig. 2. Basic structure of internal model control
Fig. 3. Structure of two-degree-of-freedom internal model control
Fig. 4. Equivalent structure of two-degree-of-freedom internal model control
Fig. 5. Structure of improved internal model control
Fig. 6. Output response curve of two-degree-of-freedom internal model control
Fig. 7. System output response curve when object model is unchanged
Fig. 8. System output response curve when object model is changed
Fig. 9. Simulation model of servo system
Fig. 10. Miss distance error with 5°, 0.25 Hz disturbance
Fig. 11. Miss distance error with 5°, 0.5 Hz disturbance
Fig. 12. Parameter perturbation miss distance error
Fig. 13. Two-axis two-frame photoelectric stabilization experimental platform
Fig. 14. Improved internal mold control miss distance error
Fig. 15. Internal mold control miss distance error
Fig. 16. Improved internal mold control miss distance error
Fig. 17. Internal mold control miss distance error
Condition of object model | Control method | Transient time /s | Overshoot /% | max |
---|
Object model is unchanged | Internal model control | 0.075 | 0 | 1.000 | Two-degree-of-freedom internal model control | 0.075 | 0 | 0.270 | Improved internal model control | 0.075 | 0 | 0.015 | Object model is changed | Internal model control | 0.100 | 6.0 | 1.000 | Two-degree-of-freedom internal model control | 0.080 | 3.5 | 0.210 | Improved internal model control | 0.080 | 3.5 | 0.011 |
|
Table 1. Step response analysis
Disturbance condition | Improved internal model control tracking error /μrad | Internal model control tracking error /μrad |
---|
Anti-interference performance test | 5°,0.25 Hz | 113 | 146 | 5°,0.5 Hz | 136 | 176 | Robustness test | 5°,0.25 Hz | 115 | 158 |
|
Table 2. Tracking error analysis of two control methods under different experimental conditions
Disturbance condition | Improved internal mold control tracking error /μrad | Internal mold controls tracking error /μrad |
---|
5°、0.25 Hz | 143 | 178 | 5°、0.5 Hz | 161 | 193 |
|
Table 3. Tracking error analysis of two control methods under different disturbance conditions