• Chinese Journal of Ship Research
  • Vol. 20, Issue 1, 135 (2025)
Qunpeng WANG1, Longhao LI2,3, Hongxu GUAN4,5, Jialun LIU3,6,7..., Jianzhe CAI4,5, Zhengrong SHA1 and Jinshui ZHANG1|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Shipping and Maritime Studies, Guangzhou Maritime University, Guangzhou 510725, China
  • 2School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
  • 3Intelligent Transport System Research Center, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
  • 4School of Navigation, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
  • 5Hubei Key Laboratory of Inland Shipping Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
  • 6State Key Laboratory of Maritime Technology and Safety(Wuhan University of Technology), Wuhan 430063, China
  • 7National Engineering Research Center for Water Transport Safety, Wuhan 430063, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.04076 Cite this Article
    Qunpeng WANG, Longhao LI, Hongxu GUAN, Jialun LIU, Jianzhe CAI, Zhengrong SHA, Jinshui ZHANG. Ship local path planning method based on three-dimensional potential field model[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2025, 20(1): 135 Copy Citation Text show less
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 1. [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 2. [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 3. [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 4. [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 5. [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 6. [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 7. [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 8. [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 9. [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 10. [in Chinese]
    [in Chinese]
    Fig. 11. [in Chinese]
    参数数值参数数值
    m/t2 000$ {k_2} $100
    $ \alpha $1.566×10−16K1
    $ \gamma $0.334 5$ \beta $6.667
    $ {T_i} $1$ N_{\mathrm{p}} $4
    $ {k_1} $1.5$ {\delta _{\max }} $/(°)35
    Table 1. Settings for simulation parameters
    参数数值
    $ T_1/\mathrm{s} $11.454 0
    $ T_2/\mathrm{s} $5.199 2
    $ T_3/\mathrm{s} $3.838 2
    $ K/\mathrm{s}^{-1} $0.116 5
    Table 2. Motion model parameters K-T for the ship
    方法最大转向角度/(°)平均舵幅/(°)路径长度/n mile曲线平滑度/rad
    传统人工势场34.2831.6172.1050.012
    改进人工势场43.3811.2922.2320.010
    三维势场21.8901.2512.2050.008
    Table 3. Comparison of simulation results for single-ship encounter scenario
    方法最大转向角度/(°)平均舵幅/(°)路径长度/n mile曲线平滑度/rad
    传统人工势场24.7152.9371.4280.830
    改进人工势场34.5158.1741.5170.737
    三维势场23.3461.7811.4320.659
    Table 4. Comparison of simulation results for single-ship crossing encounter scenario
    方法最大转向角度/(°)平均舵幅/(°)路径长度/n mile曲线平滑度/rad
    传统人工势场42.5569.4982.0420.977
    改进人工势场28.7255.7512.0470.685
    三维势场17.3303.3071.9390.639
    Table 5. Comparison of simulation results for multi-ship encounter scenario
    Qunpeng WANG, Longhao LI, Hongxu GUAN, Jialun LIU, Jianzhe CAI, Zhengrong SHA, Jinshui ZHANG. Ship local path planning method based on three-dimensional potential field model[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2025, 20(1): 135
    Download Citation