Author Affiliations
1School of Physical Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China2Faculty of Materials and Energy, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. (a) XRD patterns of BGxFG - BT (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2) ceramics. Enlarged view of peaks at (b) 32°, (c) 39.5° and (d) 45.7°.
Fig. 2. XRD refinement of the BGxFG - BT ceramics: (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.1. The red, blue, and green indicatethe experimental, calculated and difference value, respectively. The short bars indicate the positions of Bragg positions.
Fig. 3. The SEM images of BGxFG - BT ceramics: (a) x = 0; (b) x = 0.05; (c) x = 0.1; (d) x = 0.15; (e) x = 0.2; (f) the composition dependence of average grain size.
Fig. 4. XPS spectra of the (a) Bi 4f and (b) Fe 2p lines of BGxFG - BT (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15 and 0.2) ceramics.
Fig. 5. Variation of εr and tan δ with temperature at frequencies 10 kHz, 100 kHz and 1 MHz for BGxFG - BT: (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05, (c) x = 0.1, (d) x = 0.15, (e) x = 0.2.
Fig. 6. Leakage current density J of the BGxFG - BT (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2) ceramic samples as a function of the electric field E at room temperature: (a) J vs E; (b) log J vs log E
Fig. 7. Polarization versus electric field hysteresis loops of BGxFG - BT ceramics at room temperature: (a) x = 0, (b) x = 0.05–0.2.
Fig. 8. The room temperature M-H loops of the BGxFG - BT (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2) ceramics.
x | a/Å
| b/Å
| c/Å
| V/Å3 | ρ/g·cm–3 | Rwp/%
| d/%
| 0 | 5.6428(5) | 5.6428(5) | 13.8896(16) | 303.01(6) | 7.601(8) | 11.2 | 96.41 | 0.05 | 3.9886(4) | 3.9886(4) | 3.9923(11) | 63.51(3) | 7.508(4) | 10.8 | 99.28 | 0.1 | 3.9879(3) | 3.9879(3) | 3.9902(15) | 63.46(3) | 7.454(3) | 12.3 | 98.91 | 0.15 | 3.9875(4) | 3.9875(4) | 3.9899(8) | 63.44(2) | 7.421(4) | 13.8 | 98.68 | 0.2 | 3.9872(6) | 3.9872(6) | 3.9890(11) | 63.41(2) | 7.377(3) | 15.6 | 98.63 |
|
Table 1. The lattice parameters obtained by Rietveld refinement for BGxFG-BT (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2).