• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 16, Issue 12, 121901 (2018)
Dongxia Hu1、2, Yudong Tao2, Jingui Ma3, Jing Wang3、*, Heyuan Zhu1、**, and Liejia Qian3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Ultra-precision Optical Manufacturing, Department of Optical Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
  • 2Research Center of Laser Fusion, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, China
  • 3Key Laboratory for Laser Plasmas (Ministry of Education), Collaborative Innovation Center of IFSA (CICIFSA), Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL201816.121901 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Dongxia Hu, Yudong Tao, Jingui Ma, Jing Wang, Heyuan Zhu, Liejia Qian. Analysis and evaluation of idler absorption for quasi-parametric chirped-pulse amplification[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2018, 16(12): 121901 Copy Citation Text show less
    Numerical solutions of signal gain Is(z)/Is(0) (green solid lines) and idler intensity Ii(z)/Is(0) (red solid lines) and pump depletion ratio ηp (blue lines) versus crystal length z for QPCPA with (a) α=2 cm−1 and (b) α=5 cm−1, respectively. The corresponding analytical solutions calculated with Eqs. (2) and (5) are plotted as dashed and dotted lines, respectively, for comparison.
    Fig. 1. Numerical solutions of signal gain Is(z)/Is(0) (green solid lines) and idler intensity Ii(z)/Is(0) (red solid lines) and pump depletion ratio ηp (blue lines) versus crystal length z for QPCPA with (a) α=2cm1 and (b) α=5cm1, respectively. The corresponding analytical solutions calculated with Eqs. (2) and (5) are plotted as dashed and dotted lines, respectively, for comparison.
    Pump depletion curves (blue lines) for (a) OPCPA with α=0 and QPCPAs with (b) α=1.6 cm−1, (c) α=6 cm−1 and (d) α=10 cm−1, respectively. The red lines plot the evolution of idler energy (normalized to the initial pump energy).
    Fig. 2. Pump depletion curves (blue lines) for (a) OPCPA with α=0 and QPCPAs with (b) α=1.6cm1, (c) α=6cm1 and (d) α=10cm1, respectively. The red lines plot the evolution of idler energy (normalized to the initial pump energy).
    (a), (b), (c) Contour maps of pump depletion ηp versus the crystal length z/z0 and idler-absorption coefficient α/g0 for QPCPAs pumped by a spatiotemporal top-hat pulse. The contour lines for ηp are plotted with a resolution of ∼0.08. (d), (e), (f) The critical idler-absorption coefficients versus pump intensity Ip, seeding ratio Is(0)/Ip(0), and phase mismatch Δk, respectively. The blue solid circles and red open circles plot the results from numerical simulations and the empirical formula of Eq. (7), respectively.
    Fig. 3. (a), (b), (c) Contour maps of pump depletion ηp versus the crystal length z/z0 and idler-absorption coefficient α/g0 for QPCPAs pumped by a spatiotemporal top-hat pulse. The contour lines for ηp are plotted with a resolution of 0.08. (d), (e), (f) The critical idler-absorption coefficients versus pump intensity Ip, seeding ratio Is(0)/Ip(0), and phase mismatch Δk, respectively. The blue solid circles and red open circles plot the results from numerical simulations and the empirical formula of Eq. (7), respectively.
    Pump depletion contour map versus the crystal length z and initial pump intensity Ip for (a) QPCPA with αi(z)=5.3 cm−1 and (b) OPCPA with αi(z)=0, respectively.
    Fig. 4. Pump depletion contour map versus the crystal length z and initial pump intensity Ip for (a) QPCPA with αi(z)=5.3cm1 and (b) OPCPA with αi(z)=0, respectively.
    (a) Contour map of the pump depletion ratio versus the crystal length z and idler-absorption coefficient α/g0 calculated for QPCPA pumped by a spatiotemporal Gaussian pulse. For other parameters, see Table 1. (b) Two different idler-absorption spectra and (c) their corresponding efficiency curves. The pump is assumed to be spatiotemporally top-hat in (b) and (c).
    Fig. 5. (a) Contour map of the pump depletion ratio versus the crystal length z and idler-absorption coefficient α/g0 calculated for QPCPA pumped by a spatiotemporal Gaussian pulse. For other parameters, see Table 1. (b) Two different idler-absorption spectra and (c) their corresponding efficiency curves. The pump is assumed to be spatiotemporally top-hat in (b) and (c).
    Comparison of (a) idler-absorption coefficient, (b) signal gain, (c) pump depletion, and (d) idler intensity in OPCPA (solid lines) and QPCPAs with a constant absorption (dash dot lines), a step absorption function (dashed lines), and an exponential gradient absorption function (dotted lines), respectively.
    Fig. 6. Comparison of (a) idler-absorption coefficient, (b) signal gain, (c) pump depletion, and (d) idler intensity in OPCPA (solid lines) and QPCPAs with a constant absorption (dash dot lines), a step absorption function (dashed lines), and an exponential gradient absorption function (dotted lines), respectively.
     ParameterValue
    SeedCentral wavelength800 nm
    Bandwidth30 nm
    Stretched pulse duration1 ns
    PumpWavelength527 nm
    Duration1 ns
    Intensity4GW/cm2
    SmCOBEffective nonlinear coefficient0.9 pm/V
    Table 1. Default Simulation Parameters in This Letter
    Dongxia Hu, Yudong Tao, Jingui Ma, Jing Wang, Heyuan Zhu, Liejia Qian. Analysis and evaluation of idler absorption for quasi-parametric chirped-pulse amplification[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2018, 16(12): 121901
    Download Citation