Fig. 1. Normalized intensity and electric field ACF for sample 3
Fig. 2. ERMS as a function of the number of ACF data points fitted for sample 3
Fig. 3. Fitting residuals of the ACF using 105 and 73 data points
Fig. 4. ERMS as a function of the number of ACF data points fitted for Sample 1,Sample 3 and Sample 4
Fig. 5. Fitted ACFs for sample 3 with different numbers of ACF data points being fitted
Fig. 6. The PSDs of sample 3 recovered with different numbers of ACF data points being fitted
Fig. 7. The RN of sample 3 as a function of the number of ACF data points being fitted
Fig. 8. The VRSD of sample 3 as a function of the number of ACF data points being fitted
Fig. 9. The truncation position of the ACF for the two truncation methods at 0.01 level noise,0.04 level noise and 0.08 level noise
Fig. 10. The truncated positions of the electric field ACFs for sample 3 by the two truncation methods
Fig. 11. The recovered PSDs of sample 3 by the two truncation methods
Fig. 12. The norms of PSDs of sample 3 from 60 data sets obtained by the two truncation methods
Fig. 13. The peak sizes of sample 3 from 60 data sets obtained by the two truncation methods
Fig. 14. The ERMS of the ACFs at different data points for sample 6
Fig. 15. The recovered PSDs of sample 6 by the two truncation methods
ACF points fitted | ERMS | Dpeak/nm | EPK/% | PSD width/nm | VRSD/% | RN/% |
---|
59 | 0.001 8 | 202.9 | 2.56 | 197.8 | 3.3 | 7.1 | 73 | 0.006 8 | 201.9 | 2.39 | 120.9 | 3.1 | 10.8 | 105 | 0.024 6 | 189.8 | 7.14 | 91.0 | 5.3 | 8.7 |
|
Table 0. Inversion results of 60 data sets of Sample 3 at different numbers of ACF data points
Method | ERMS | Dpeak1/nm | Dpeak2/nm | EPK1/% | EPK2/% | VRSD1/% | VRSD2/% | RN/% |
---|
RMSET | 0.002 8 | 31.0 | 202.2 | 6.5 | 3.0 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 6.2 | FACFT | 0.003 9 | 29.7 | 197.8 | 10.4 | 4.4 | 8.9 | 5.8 | 9.8 |
|
Table 0. Inversion results for sample 6 obtained by the two truncation methods
No. | ERMS | Dpeak/nm | EPK/% | PSD width/nm | VRSD/% | RN/% |
---|
RMSET | FACFT | RMSET | FACFT | RMSET | FACFT | RMSET | FACFT | RMSET | FACFT | RMSET | FACFT |
---|
Sample 1 | 0.002 6 | 0.002 5 | 33.8 | 33.6 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 25.4 | 24.8 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 5.6 | 5.6 | Sample 2 | 0.003 0 | 0.003 7 | 63.4 | 62.9 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 42.7 | 39.6 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 4.1 | 5.7 | Sample 3 | 0.003 0 | 0.005 9 | 204.5 | 200.6 | 2.1 | 3.4 | 149.3 | 125.8 | 2.4 | 4.6 | 7.2 | 9.2 | Sample 4 | 0.003 1 | 0.008 9 | 576.9 | 526.3 | 7.1 | 11.0 | 514.2 | 339.7 | 7.1 | 13.2 | 13.8 | 15.5 | Sample 5 | 0.003 3 | 0.008 7 | 1 289.6 | 1214.9 | 9.4 | 13.9 | 1 376.3 | 898.8 | 11.2 | 17.2 | 14.4 | 16.4 |
|
Table 0. Inversion results for different samples under two truncation methods