• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 5, Issue 3, 224 (2017)
Zheyong Zhang1、2, Jianping Ding1、2, and Hui-Tian Wang1、2、3、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures and School of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • 2Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • 3MOE Key Laboratory of Weak Light Nonlinear Photonics and School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.5.000224 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zheyong Zhang, Jianping Ding, Hui-Tian Wang. Entanglement and nonlocality in a coupled-cavity system[J]. Photonics Research, 2017, 5(3): 224 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic configuration of the two-site coupled-cavity system. The system is composed of two harmonic resonators and two Λ-type three-level atoms. For the atom, |e⟩ represents the excitation state, and |H⟩ and |V⟩ are the degenerate ground states of the atom.
    Fig. 1. Schematic configuration of the two-site coupled-cavity system. The system is composed of two harmonic resonators and two Λ-type three-level atoms. For the atom, |e represents the excitation state, and |H and |V are the degenerate ground states of the atom.
    Entropies in the ground states as a function of detuning and hopping strength. Parameter values are gV=0.5gH, where gH=1 is set as the basic unit throughout this paper.
    Fig. 2. Entropies in the ground states as a function of detuning and hopping strength. Parameter values are gV=0.5gH, where gH=1 is set as the basic unit throughout this paper.
    Probabilities for the purely atomic states in the ground states.
    Fig. 3. Probabilities for the purely atomic states in the ground states.
    Probabilities for the intersect states, one atom being in the excited state in one cavity, while a photon is in its eigenstate in the other cavity, in the ground states.
    Fig. 4. Probabilities for the intersect states, one atom being in the excited state in one cavity, while a photon is in its eigenstate in the other cavity, in the ground states.
    Probabilities for the intersect states, two excitations being in the same cavity, in the ground states.
    Fig. 5. Probabilities for the intersect states, two excitations being in the same cavity, in the ground states.
    Probabilities for the all-photon states.
    Fig. 6. Probabilities for the all-photon states.
    Probabilities of the intersect states: (a) one atom excited in one cavity and one H-polarized photon excited in the other cavity, (b) one atom excited in one cavity and one V-polarized photon excited in the other cavity, (c) one atom and one H-polarized photon excited in the same cavity, and (d) one atom and one V-polarized photon excited in the same cavity.
    Fig. 7. Probabilities of the intersect states: (a) one atom excited in one cavity and one H-polarized photon excited in the other cavity, (b) one atom excited in one cavity and one V-polarized photon excited in the other cavity, (c) one atom and one H-polarized photon excited in the same cavity, and (d) one atom and one V-polarized photon excited in the same cavity.
    Probability distribution of the H-polarized photons under the small hopping limit. Parameter values are gH=2gV and A=0.01gH.
    Fig. 8. Probability distribution of the H-polarized photons under the small hopping limit. Parameter values are gH=2gV and A=0.01gH.
    Bipartite entanglement under the small hopping limit. Parameter values are gH=2gV and A=0.01gH.
    Fig. 9. Bipartite entanglement under the small hopping limit. Parameter values are gH=2gV and A=0.01gH.
    Probability distribution of the eigenstates in the one-site subsystem. The inset shows the total probability for the three eigenstates. Parameter values are gH=2gV and A=0.01gH.
    Fig. 10. Probability distribution of the eigenstates in the one-site subsystem. The inset shows the total probability for the three eigenstates. Parameter values are gH=2gV and A=0.01gH.
    Bipartite entanglement under the large hopping limit. Parameter values are gH=2gV and A=10gH.
    Fig. 11. Bipartite entanglement under the large hopping limit. Parameter values are gH=2gV and A=10gH.
    Dependence of S=⟨MxNα⟩+⟨MxNβ⟩+⟨MyNα⟩−⟨MyNβ⟩ on the detuning Δ. The solid curves show the results calculated in the classical manner, while the dashed curves are the results calculated in the quantum manner. From top to bottom, and from left to right, panels (a)–(i) correspond to the results calculated for directions α=0,π/4,π/2,3π/4,π,5π/4,3π/2,7π/4, and 2π, respectively. The gray lines are the gridlines of ±2,±22. Parameters are gH=2gV and A=0.01gH.
    Fig. 12. Dependence of S=MxNα+MxNβ+MyNαMyNβ on the detuning Δ. The solid curves show the results calculated in the classical manner, while the dashed curves are the results calculated in the quantum manner. From top to bottom, and from left to right, panels (a)–(i) correspond to the results calculated for directions α=0,π/4,π/2,3π/4,π,5π/4,3π/2,7π/4, and 2π, respectively. The gray lines are the gridlines of ±2,±22. Parameters are gH=2gV and A=0.01gH.
    Zheyong Zhang, Jianping Ding, Hui-Tian Wang. Entanglement and nonlocality in a coupled-cavity system[J]. Photonics Research, 2017, 5(3): 224
    Download Citation