• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 49, Issue 4, 0404003 (2022)
Linghao Zhang1、2, Kegui Xia1、2、*, Xinghua Ma1, Linglin Zhu1, Aijun Zeng1、2、**, Huijie Huang1、2, and Avakaw Sergey3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Laboratory of Information Optics and Optoelectronic Technology, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
  • 2Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3Company of KBTEM-OMO Republication Unitary Scientific and Production Enterprise, Minsk 220033, Belarus
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL202249.0404003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Linghao Zhang, Kegui Xia, Xinghua Ma, Linglin Zhu, Aijun Zeng, Huijie Huang, Avakaw Sergey. Detection Method for 248 nm Depolarizer Independent of Laser Intensity Fluctuation[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2022, 49(4): 0404003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Structure diagram of depolarizer
    Fig. 1. Structure diagram of depolarizer
    Schematic of 248 nm depolarizer detection method
    Fig. 2. Schematic of 248 nm depolarizer detection method
    10000-repeated measurement results for output intensity of excimer KrF laser
    Fig. 3. 10000-repeated measurement results for output intensity of excimer KrF laser
    DOP versus vibration direction angle and beam size of incident light. (a) DOP versus vibration direction angle of incident light; (b) DOP versus beam diameter
    Fig. 4. DOP versus vibration direction angle and beam size of incident light. (a) DOP versus vibration direction angle of incident light; (b) DOP versus beam diameter
    DOP versus extinction ratio of polarizer and analyser. (a) DOP versus polarizer extinction ratio; (b) absolute error between the measured and true DOP values versus analyser extinction ratio under different true DOP values
    Fig. 5. DOP versus extinction ratio of polarizer and analyser. (a) DOP versus polarizer extinction ratio; (b) absolute error between the measured and true DOP values versus analyser extinction ratio under different true DOP values
    Absolute error curves of measured and true DOP values. (a) Absolute error versus rotation precision of analyser under different true values; (b) absolute error versus true DOP value under different probe accuracy values
    Fig. 6. Absolute error curves of measured and true DOP values. (a) Absolute error versus rotation precision of analyser under different true values; (b) absolute error versus true DOP value under different probe accuracy values
    Experimental equipment for 248 nm depolarizer detection
    Fig. 7. Experimental equipment for 248 nm depolarizer detection
    Ordinal numberDOP /%
    11.304
    21.333
    31.323
    41.300
    51.277
    61.237
    71.257
    81.367
    91.215
    101.289
    Mean value μ /%1.2902
    Standard deviation σ /%0.0458
    Coefficient of variation Cv /%3.5477
    Table 1. DOP measurement results obtained by wave-plate verification test
    Ordinal numberDOP /%
    12.026
    22.065
    32.161
    41.969
    52.123
    62.205
    72.010
    82.114
    92.001
    102.027
    Mean value μ /%2.0701
    Standard deviation σ /%0.0772
    Coefficient of variation Cv /%3.7287
    Table 2. DOP measurement results of depolarizer in repeatability test
    Ordinal numberDOP / %
    12.055
    22.141
    32.014
    41.924
    52.116
    62.023
    71.908
    82.266
    92.047
    102.243
    112.098
    122.162
    132.090
    142.211
    152.112
    162.153
    172.133
    182.069
    192.236
    202.272
    Mean value μ /%2.1137
    Standard deviation σ /%0.1030
    Coefficient of variation Cv /%4.8730
    Table 3. DOP measurement results of depolarizer in reproducibility test
    Linghao Zhang, Kegui Xia, Xinghua Ma, Linglin Zhu, Aijun Zeng, Huijie Huang, Avakaw Sergey. Detection Method for 248 nm Depolarizer Independent of Laser Intensity Fluctuation[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2022, 49(4): 0404003
    Download Citation