A Readability Evaluation Method of Helicopter HUD in Complex Visual Environment

ZHAQNG Hongfei; WANG Zhishan; ZAHNG Haijun; GUO Xiaoguang; FENG Chaokun

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-637x.2018.07.016

[2] UK Ministry of Defence.DEF STAN 00-970 part 1 section 4:crew stations-general requirements guidelines for the design of crewstation lighting and displays［S］.London:UK Ministry of Defence Directorate of Standardisation，1999.

[3] VASSIE K. Specification and assessment of the visual aspects of cockpit displays［J］.Sid Symposium Digest of Technical Papers，1998，29(1):1199-1203.

[4] KELLEY E F.Sensitivity of display reflection measurements to apparatus geometry［J］.Sid Symposium Digest of Technical Papers，2012，33(1):140-143.

[5] DOROTHEE C W.Modelling image quality for automotive display technologies［D］.Dundee：Abertay University， 2014.

[6] KELLEY E F.Display daylight ambient contrast measurement methods and daylight readability［J］.Journal of the Society for Information Display，2006，14(11):1019-1030.

[8] DOD.MIL-PRF-22885/108E Switches，pushbutton， illuminated，4-lamp replaceable incandescent or non-replaceable light emitting diode(LED)，0.750 square，SPDT，DPDT，4 PDT silver contacts-2 circuit (5 Amperes) or SPDT (7.5 Amperes);gold contacts-low level to 1 Ampere，sunlight readable display(dripproof，watertight，splashproof，EMI/RFI shielding，high impact shock resistant，common termination system，night vision goggle compatible)［S］.Washington:Departments and Agencies of the Department of Defense，2014.

[9] NAZZAL A. A new daylight glare evaluation method:introduction of the monitoring protocol and calculation method［J］.Energy and Buildings，2001，33(3):257-265.

[10] BLACKWEL H R. Description of a comprehensive family of relative contrast sensitivity (RCS) functions of luminance to reflect differences in size of task detailtask eccentricity and observer age［J］. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering，2013，11(1):52-63.