• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 4, Issue 3, 0A22 (2016)
Tianwu Wang1, Elena A. Romanova2, Nabil Abdel-Moneim3, David Furniss3, Anna Loth3, Zhuoqi Tang3, Angela Seddon3, Trevor Benson3, Andrei Lavrinenko1, and Peter Uhd Jepsen1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Photonics Engineering (DTU Fotonik), Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
  • 2Saratov State University, Department of Physics, Astrakhanskaya 83, Saratov 410012, Russia
  • 3Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/prj.4.000a22 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Tianwu Wang, Elena A. Romanova, Nabil Abdel-Moneim, David Furniss, Anna Loth, Zhuoqi Tang, Angela Seddon, Trevor Benson, Andrei Lavrinenko, Peter Uhd Jepsen. Time-resolved terahertz spectroscopy of charge carrier dynamics in the chalcogenide glass As30Se30Te40 [Invited][J]. Photonics Research, 2016, 4(3): 0A22 Copy Citation Text show less
    Experimental setup for static and transient THz-TDS. For static spectroscopy, the pump pulse is blocked. The THz beam splitter (BS) together with mirror M are used in reflection mode.
    Fig. 1. Experimental setup for static and transient THz-TDS. For static spectroscopy, the pump pulse is blocked. The THz beam splitter (BS) together with mirror M are used in reflection mode.
    THz time domain traces transmitting through a 54-μm-thick sample of As30Se30Te40 and dry air. The inset shows the corresponding Fourier transformed spectra.
    Fig. 2. THz time domain traces transmitting through a 54-μm-thick sample of As30Se30Te40 and dry air. The inset shows the corresponding Fourier transformed spectra.
    (a) Refractive index and absorption coefficient and (b) the real and imaginary parts of the complex permittivity of As30Se30Te40. The error bars indicate the standard deviation based on three individual measurements.
    Fig. 3. (a) Refractive index and absorption coefficient and (b) the real and imaginary parts of the complex permittivity of As30Se30Te40. The error bars indicate the standard deviation based on three individual measurements.
    (a) Differential reflectivity of the THz peak electric field as a function of pump–probe delay time for pump fluences of 0.32–0.82 mJ/cm2. The symbols are experimental results, and the solid lines represent the decay kinetics model shown in the inset. (b) Normalized decay curves, which show that the kinetics slows down at increasing pump fluence.
    Fig. 4. (a) Differential reflectivity of the THz peak electric field as a function of pump–probe delay time for pump fluences of 0.320.82  mJ/cm2. The symbols are experimental results, and the solid lines represent the decay kinetics model shown in the inset. (b) Normalized decay curves, which show that the kinetics slows down at increasing pump fluence.
    2D map of (a) the real part and (b) the imaginary part of the photoinduced ultrafast conductivity of As30Se30Te40 at a pump fluence of 0.7 mJ/cm2.
    Fig. 5. 2D map of (a) the real part and (b) the imaginary part of the photoinduced ultrafast conductivity of As30Se30Te40 at a pump fluence of 0.7  mJ/cm2.
    2D map of photoinduced refractive index change of As30Se30Te40 in reflection measurement at pump fluence of 0.7 mJ/cm2.
    Fig. 6. 2D map of photoinduced refractive index change of As30Se30Te40 in reflection measurement at pump fluence of 0.7  mJ/cm2.
    Complex photoinduced conductivity of As30Se30Te40 at pump fluence of 0.7 mJ/cm2. The solid lines are the fits based on the Drude–Smith model.
    Fig. 7. Complex photoinduced conductivity of As30Se30Te40 at pump fluence of 0.7  mJ/cm2. The solid lines are the fits based on the Drude–Smith model.
    Temporal development of the carrier dynamics parameters for As30Se30Te40 extracted from the Drude–Smith model fits at different pump–probe delays. (a) Carrier scattering time τ, (b) backscattering parameter c, and (c) carrier density. The shaded areas indicate the time at which the probe pulse arrives before the pump pulse, with poorly defined fit parameters.
    Fig. 8. Temporal development of the carrier dynamics parameters for As30Se30Te40 extracted from the Drude–Smith model fits at different pump–probe delays. (a) Carrier scattering time τ, (b) backscattering parameter c, and (c) carrier density. The shaded areas indicate the time at which the probe pulse arrives before the pump pulse, with poorly defined fit parameters.
    Mode i12
    ωi [rad/ps]13.6±0.2242.05±0.08
    γi [rad/ps]16.8±1.29.6±0.3
    Ai [rad2/ps2]403±251205±25
    ϵ8.76±0.015
    Table 1. Parameters for the Oscillator Model for As30Se30Te40
    Tianwu Wang, Elena A. Romanova, Nabil Abdel-Moneim, David Furniss, Anna Loth, Zhuoqi Tang, Angela Seddon, Trevor Benson, Andrei Lavrinenko, Peter Uhd Jepsen. Time-resolved terahertz spectroscopy of charge carrier dynamics in the chalcogenide glass As30Se30Te40 [Invited][J]. Photonics Research, 2016, 4(3): 0A22
    Download Citation