• High Power Laser Science and Engineering
  • Vol. 6, Issue 2, 02000e23 (2018)
Xiong Shen1、2, Peng Wang1、2, Jun Liu1、3、*, and Ruxin Li1、3
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3IFSA Collaborative Innovation Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1017/hpl.2018.12 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xiong Shen, Peng Wang, Jun Liu, Ruxin Li. Linear angular dispersion compensation of cleaned self-diffraction light with a single prism[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e23 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    The linear angular dispersion of a self-diffraction (SD) pulse, from a femtosecond laser pulse cleaning device, is compensated for by the use of a single prism. More than $500~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{J}$ first-order SD pulse has a contrast of $10^{12}$, which is about five orders of magnitude improvement from the input fundamental pulse. The wings of the distribution away from the main pulse in $\pm 1$ ps are cleaned with a contrast improvement of about $10^{7}$, which verifies the pulse cleaning ability of the SD process.

    1 Introduction

    Peta watt (PW) level laser systems, with focused laser peak intensity of about or even higher, have been reported repeatedly[16]. These extremely high intensity conditions have aroused new interest in exploring laser–matter interactions, such as particle acceleration, bright X-ray source generation, and inertial confinement fusion[7, 8]. Temporal contrast is one of the crucial parameters of PW laser pulses. Prepulses with laser peak intensity higher than [9, 10] in advance of the main pulse should be avoided as they can pre-ionize the target and generate a low density preplasma before the main pulse reaches the target.

    To build high temporal contrast laser systems, optical parametric chirped-pulse amplification (OPCPA)[11, 12] and double chirped-pulse amplification (double CPA)[3, 13, 14] combined with pulse cleaning techniques have been proposed in the past decades. These pulse cleaning techniques include saturable absorbers[15], optical parametric amplification[3, 16], polarization rotation[13, 17], and cross-polarized wave (XPW) generation[1820]. Pulse cleaning by using a self-diffraction (SD) process in a bulk Kerr medium was proposed recently[21, 22].

    In theory, the temporal contrast of the first-order SD signal is the cube of the temporal contrast of the incident pulse as , because the generated cleaned SD signals are spatially separated from the incident beams without use of any polarization discrimination devices. What is more, this technique can also achieve a high energy SD signal output using a cylinder mirror focusing on the incident beams, even with low energy-conversion efficiency[21]. These two advantages make the SD process a good choice for providing seed pulses for PW laser systems. However, the angular dispersion of the SD signals may affect the pulse compression of the amplified pulse in the compressor.

    In this study, we report the highest pulse energy and highest temporal contrast enhancement pulses generation based on the SD effect with two cylindrical convex lenses so far. More than first-order SD signal with a temporal contrast of is generated with about five orders of magnitude improvement. The wings around the main pulse in  ps are cleaned with a contrast improvement of about , which verifies the pulse cleaning ability of SD process. The cause of angular dispersion generation of the SD signals is also explored, and the linear angular dispersion is compensated with a single prism.

    2 Principle and experimental setup

    The SD process is a degenerated cascaded four-wave mixing (DCFWM) process[2123]. It acts as a temporal gating to improve the temporal contrast of a laser pulse. As an instantaneous third-order nonlinear optical effect, the SD process happened in hundreds of femtosecond time scale which requires a relatively high laser intensity at the same time. Weak satellite pulses and amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise can be filtered out by this process[21]. In the time domain, the intensity of the first-order SD signal has the relationship to the intensities of the two input beams as , where is the time delay between the two input pulses[24]. According to the equation, the temporal contrast of the signal is the cube of that of the incident pulse . Furthermore, the generated signals and incident beams are separated spatially, which means no polarizer with a limited extinction ratio is needed, which is a main limitation for the XPW process. These properties indicate a potential high temporal contrast enhancement by using the SD process.

    Figure 1 shows the experimental setup. Pulses from a laser system are separated into two beams and by a 50/50 beam splitter. Both and are separately focused into a Kerr medium P1 by two plane-convex cylindrical lenses CL1 and CL2. There is a delay line in the path of . P1 is a 0.15 mm thick fused silica plate which is located about 60 mm behind the focus of the two lenses with a near Brewster angle to the two incident beams. The external crossing angle between the two incident beams is about , where the phase-matching condition can be easily satisfied[21]. SD signals are formed beside the two incident beams in the condition that the two beams are temporally and spatially overlapped. An aperture A filters out the first-order SD signal , then is collimated by a cylindrical reflective mirror CM1. The collimated beam is reduced in beam size to about 3 mm diameter by a spherical concave reflective mirror and a spherical convex reflective mirror, and is then taken to a commercial third-order cross-correlator (Amplitude Technologies Inc., Sequia 800) for temporal contrast measurement. A variable neutral-density (VND) filter is used to adjust the input energy into the correlator. P2 is inserted to create replicas of the main pulse of .

    3 Results and discussion

    3.1 High energy and high temporal contrast SD pulse generation

    To generate SD signals with high energy and temporal contrast, experiments were performed with a commercial Ti:sapphire CPA laser system (Legend Elite Cryo PA, Coherent Inc.). The laser system produces 1 kHz/50 fs/800 nm/10 mJ pulses with a diameter of about 15 mm. The pulse energies of the two incident beams before the Kerr medium P1 are both about 4.9 mJ. The beam size on the Kerr medium is about . About five diffracted orders of SD signals are generated beside each side of the two incident beams. The first-order SD signals and are about and , respectively. The energy-conversion efficiency from the two incident beams to is about 7.8%.

    To characterize the temporal contrast of , the diameter of signal beam is reduced to about 3 mm by C1 (spherical concave reflective mirror, ) and C2 (spherical convex reflective mirror,  mm) first. Then, a 2 mm thick VND filter is used to adjust the input energy to the correlator to about 200 mW. A 1 mm thick fused silica plate is inserted in the path of to introduce reference post-pulses.

    The measured temporal contrast curves of the input pulse and are shown in Figure 2. For the input pulse, before the main pulse, there are five replicas a/b/c/d/e with contrast varying from to , and they are time symmetrical with replicas a’/b’/c’/d’/e’ after the main pulse, respectively. These replicas may come from reflection between front and rear surfaces of optical elements in the laser path. An amplified ASE-noise with contrast change from to also exists around the main pulse. The 1 mm thick fused silica plate P2 introduces replicas A’ and C’ after the main pulse of with normalized intensity about and , respectively, which are about one order lower than the values introduced by the front and rear sides reflection of a fused silica plate. It may be caused by the tilt of P2, that the replicas and the main pulse are not collinear entirely. Replicas A and B are time symmetrical with replicas A’ and B’. From the inset in Figure 2, we can see that the SD process lasting just hundreds of femtosecond gated out all the replicas before the main pulse of the input pulse. Wings around the main pulse in  ps are cleaned with a contrast improvement of about , which verifies the pulse cleaning ability of SD process.

    3.2 Analyzation of angular dispersion generation

    The generation of the angular dispersion of is caused by the different phase-matching condition of wavelength components of the two incident beams shown in Figure 3.

    For , its phase-matching condition is . In the direction, denotes the wave vector of the longest wavelength component and the wave vector of the shortest wavelength component. Similarly, in the direction, denotes the wave vector of the longest wavelength component and the wave vector of the shortest wavelength component. Then the generated longest wavelength and shortest wavelength in can be expressed as and , respectively. is the original longest and the shortest wavelength of the incident pulses. The phase-matching conditions for the longest and shortest wavelength SD signals are and , respectively. Then the dispersion angle of is the angle between and . It is related to the cross angle of the two incident beams, the shortest and the longest wavelength components of the two beams, and can be expressed as , , .

    There is a little difference between the center wavelength of and that of the incident pulses, and can be calculated according to the law of cosines: , where is the new generated center wavelength of and the original center wavelength of the incident pulses. For  nm, . The new generated center wavelength of  nm. It can be concluded that for a small crossing angle of the two incident beams, the generated first-order SD signals almost keep the same center wavelength of the incident pulses, and the SD process can be looked on as a frequency-conserving process.

    3.3 Angular dispersion compensation

    For an incident beam with a spectrum as shown in Figure 4(a), its full width at half maximum (FWHM) spectrum width is about 28 nm with center wavelength at 803 nm. The generated dispersion angle  mrad according to the equation of . Then the angular dispersion can be roughly calculated as  mrad/nm. The divergence angle caused by the lenses CL1 and CL2 with 500 mm focal length is about  mrad. After about 2000 mm, the beam width of the is about  mm.

    In the experiment, after propagation of about 2000 mm in air, the width of beam is about 30 mm. We measured the spectra of at 30 different positions P0 to P29 in the horizontal direction, with every two positions separated by about 1 mm. Figure 4(b) shows the spectra measured at position P0/P4/P9/P14/P19/P24/P29 points. The curve of center wavelength measured at each position is presented in the insert figure in Figure 4(b). The center wavelength is shifted by about 20 nm. The angular dispersion measured can be roughly denoted as . , the measured result of the angular dispersion of generated SD signal matches very well with the theoretically calculated result.

    The scheme of angular dispersion compensation is shown in Figure 5. A fused silica prism with apex angle rad is used to compensate the angular dispersion in our experiment. In beam , longer wavelength is located far away from the two incident beams and shorter wavelength located closer to the two incident beams. A cylindrical reflective mirror with focal length of 200 mm located 400 mm behind the Kerr medium P1 is used to symmetrically focus .

    For a prism with refractive index and apex angle , we can obtain the angular dispersion of the prism[25] as . According to the measurement, the angular dispersion of the generated is about 0.15 mrad/nm with center wavelength shifting from 795 nm to 815 nm. We just consider the two edge center wavelengths  nm and  nm here. We can calculate their refractive index according to Cauchy’s dispersion formula in the prism as and , respectively.

    The relation between and can be calculated with Snell’s law , and  rad. If the cross angle between the two output beams is about , the angle is the right output angle of the beam. The input angle of the beam can be calculated as about  rad.

    The angular dispersion compensated propagates about 1500 mm, and is expanded to about 20 mm in the horizontal direction. The spectra of at five different positions with 5 mm apart are shown in Figure 6(c).

    As can be seen in Figure 6(c), the spectra of compensated at five different positions show a good coincidence. While, residual angular dispersion still exists, and it is clear that the compensation for the shorter wavelengths appears better than that for the longer wavelengths, we think this is the residual high-order angular dispersion as the center wavelengths vary nonlinearly relative to the five positions of equal interval.

    4 Conclusion

    In conclusion, temporal contrast enhancement by the SD process in a bulk Kerr medium possesses a few advantages compared to many other pulse cleaning techniques. The SD signals are spatially separated from the incident beams without the use of any polarization discrimination devices. It can also achieve a high energy SD signal output with a cylindrical mirror focusing on the incident beams even with low energy-conversion efficiency. The temporal contrast of the signal is the cube of the temporal contrast of the incident pulse, in theory, which indicates a great potential of temporal contrast enhancement by the SD process.

    In this study, a temporal contrast enhancement equipment based on SD effect with two cylindrical convex lenses is built. As high as first-order SD signal at 800 nm with contrast of is generated with about five orders of magnitude improvement. Wings around the main pulse in are cleaned with a contrast improvement of about , which verifies the pulse cleaning ability of SD process. The cause of angular dispersion generation of the SD signals is also explored, and the angular dispersion is compensated with a single prism. It is expected to extend the SD process as an effective pulse cleaning method for high power laser at 1053 nm with a narrow spectral bandwidth and hundreds of femtosecond pulse duration.

    References

    [1] M. Aoyama, K. Yamakawa, Y. Akahane, J. Ma, N. Inoue, H. Ueda, H. Kiriyama. Opt. Lett., 28, 1594(2003).

    [2] V. V. Lozhkarev, G. I. Freidman, V. N. Ginzburg, E. V. Katin, E. A. Khazanov, A. V. Kirsanov, G. A. Luchinin, A. N. Mal’shakov, M. A. Martyanov, O. V. Palashov, A. K. Poteomkin, A. M. Sergeev, A. A. Shaykin, I. V. Yakovlev. Laser Phys. Lett., 4, 421(2007).

    [3] Z. Wang, C. Liu, Z. Shen, Q. Zhang, H. Teng, Z. Wei. Opt. Lett., 36, 3194(2011).

    [4] T. J. Yu, S. K. Lee, J. H. Sung, J. W. Yoon, T. M. Jeong, J. Lee. Opt. Express, 20, 10807(2012).

    [5] Y. Chu, Z. Gan, X. Liang, L. Yu, X. Lu, C. Wang, X. Wang, L. Xu, H. Lu, D. Yin, Y. Leng, R. Li, Z. Xu. Opt. Lett., 40, 5011(2015).

    [6] L. Yu, X. Liang, L. Xu, W. Li, C. Peng, Z. Hu, C. Wang, X. Lu, Y. Chu, Z. Gan, X. Liu, Y. Liu, X. Wang, H. Lu, D. Yin, Y. Leng, R. Li, Z. Xu. Opt. Lett., 40, 3412(2015).

    [7] H. Kiriyama, M. Mori, A. S. Pirozhkov, K. Ogura, A. Sagisaka, A. Kon, T. Z. Esirkepov, Y. Hayashi, H. Kotaki, M. Kanasaki, H. Sakaki, Y. Fukuda, J. Koga, M. Nishiuchi, M. Kando, S. V. Bulanov, K. Kondo, P. R. Bolton, O. Slezak, D. Vojna, M. Sawicka-Chyla, V. Jambunathan, A. Lucianetti, T. Mocek. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 21, 18(2015).

    [8] Y. I. Salamin, S. X. Hu, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, C. H. Keitel. Phys. Rep., 427, 41(2006).

    [9] P. B. Corkum, F. Brunel, N. K. Sherman, T. Srinivasanrao. Phys. Rev. Lett., 61, 2886(1988).

    [10] B. C. Stuart, M. D. Feit, S. Herman, A. M. Rubenchik, B. W. Shore, M. D. Perry. Phys. Rev. B, 53, 1749(1996).

    [11] H. Kiriyama, M. Mori, Y. Nakai, Y. Yamamoto, M. Tanoue, A. Akutsu, T. Shimomura, S. Kondo, S. Kanazawa, H. Daido, T. Kimura, N. Miyanaga. Opt. Lett., 32, 2315(2007).

    [12] H. Kiriyama, M. Mori, Y. Nakai, T. Shimomura, M. Tanoue, A. Akutsu, S. Kondo, S. Kanazawa, H. Okada, T. Motomura, H. Daido, T. Kimura, T. Tajima. Opt. Lett., 33, 645(2008).

    [13] M. P. Kalashnikov, E. Risse, H. Schonnagel, W. Sandner. Opt. Lett., 30, 923(2005).

    [14] N. Xie, K. N. Zhou, W. Q. Huang, X. D. Wang, L. Sun, Y. Guo, Q. Li. Opt. Eng., 51, 5(2012).

    [15] H. Kiriyama, M. Mori, Y. Nakai, T. Shimomura, H. Sasao, M. Tanoue, S. Kanazawa, D. Wakai, F. Sasao, H. Okada, I. Daito, M. Suzuki, S. Kondo, K. Kondo, A. Sugiyama, P. R. Bolton, A. Yokoyama, H. Daido, S. Kawanishi, T. Kimura, T. Tajima. Opt. Lett., 35, 1497(2010).

    [16] Y. S. Huang, C. M. Zhang, Y. Xu, D. X. Li, Y. X. Leng, R. X. Li, Z. Z. Xu. Opt. Lett., 36, 781(2011).

    [17] D. Homoelle, A. L. Gaeta, V. Yanovsky, G. Mourou. Opt. Lett., 27, 1646(2002).

    [18] V. Yanovsky, V. Chvykov, G. Kalinchenko, P. Rousseau, T. Planchon, T. Matsuoka, A. Maksimchuk, J. Nees, G. Cheriaux, G. Mourou, K. Krushelnick. Opt. Express, 16, 2109(2008).

    [19] V. Chvykov, P. Rousseau, S. Reed, G. Kalinchenko, V. Yanovsky. Opt. Lett., 31, 1456(2006).

    [20] A. Jullien, O. Albert, F. Burgy, G. Hamoniaux, L. P. Rousseau, J. P. Chambaret, F. Auge-Rochereau, G. Cheriaux, J. Etchepare, N. Minkovski, S. M. Saltiel. Opt. Lett., 30, 920(2005).

    [21] F. J. Li, X. Shen, P. Wang, Y. Y. Li, J. Liu, Z. S. Wang, R. X. Li. Laser Phys. Lett., 13(2016).

    [22] J. Liu, K. Okamura, Y. Kida, T. Kobayashi. Opt. Express, 18, 22245(2010).

    [23] J. Liu, T. Kobayashi. Sensors, 10, 4296(2010).

    [24] V. L. Vinetskii, N. V. Kukhtarev, S. G. Odulov, M. S. Soskin. Usp. Fiz. Nauk, 129, 113(1979).

    [25] R. L. Fork, O. E. Martinez, J. P. Gordon. Opt. Lett., 9, 150(1984).

    Xiong Shen, Peng Wang, Jun Liu, Ruxin Li. Linear angular dispersion compensation of cleaned self-diffraction light with a single prism[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 02000e23
    Download Citation