• Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves
  • Vol. 24, Issue 4, 296 (2005)
[in Chinese]1、2, [in Chinese]1, and [in Chinese]1
Author Affiliations
  • 1[in Chinese]
  • 2[in Chinese]
  • show less
    DOI: Cite this Article
    [in Chinese], [in Chinese], [in Chinese]. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT SPECTRAL MATCH MODELS[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2005, 24(4): 296 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Tree spectral match models including minimums distance (MD), spectral angel model (SAM), spectral correlation fitting (SCF), were calculated and analyzed based on the spectrums taken from the field. However, the difference of the three models is not significant. The SAM was better but far from the best. Under this circumstance, derivative method was used to enhance the ability of discrimination. The match models were recalculated after the first derivative. Better results are achieved and the discriminability is remarkably enhanced, especially to the minimums distance model.
    [in Chinese], [in Chinese], [in Chinese]. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT SPECTRAL MATCH MODELS[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2005, 24(4): 296
    Download Citation