• Geographical Research
  • Vol. 39, Issue 7, 1592 (2020)
Bosheng ZHANG1 and Zisheng YANG2、3、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Economics, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China
  • 2Institute of Land & Resources and Sustainable Development, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China
  • 3Institute of Targeted Poverty Alleviation and Development, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020190775 Cite this Article
    Bosheng ZHANG, Zisheng YANG. Rural poverty reduction and its spatial spillover effects of Chinese urbanization: Based on the analysis of spatial econometric model with provincial panel data[J]. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(7): 1592 Copy Citation Text show less
    Mechanism of rural labor productivity improvement driven by urbanization
    Fig. 1. Mechanism of rural labor productivity improvement driven by urbanization
    Spatial clustering of rural poverty and urbanization in provinces of China from 2010 to 2017
    Fig. 2. Spatial clustering of rural poverty and urbanization in provinces of China from 2010 to 2017
    Effects of rural poverty alleviation by population, land and economic urbanization respectively
    Fig. 3. Effects of rural poverty alleviation by population, land and economic urbanization respectively
    Comparison of population urbanization and threshold value in provinces of China from 2010 to 2017
    Fig. 4. Comparison of population urbanization and threshold value in provinces of China from 2010 to 2017
    Comparison of economic urbanization and threshold value in provinces of China from 2010 to 2017
    Fig. 5. Comparison of economic urbanization and threshold value in provinces of China from 2010 to 2017
    变量类型具体指标(变量)指标含义(单位)
    被解释变量农村贫困发生率(pove农村贫困人口占农村总人口比例(%)
    核心解释变量人口城镇化(urb_p城镇常驻人口占总人口比例(%)
    土地城镇化(urb_l建成区面积占总面积比例(%)
    经济城镇化(urb_e第三产业产值占GDP的比例(%)
    控制变量经济增长(gdp_gGDP增长率(%)
    农村收入水平(inco农民人均纯收入(元)
    城乡收入差距(u_r_d城乡居民人均收入之比
    农村转移人口就业环境(empl城镇登记失业率(%)
    农村人力资本(huma农村人口平均受教育年限(年)
    农村市场化水平(mark农村人均社会消费品零售额(万元)
    农村资本投入(capi农村住户人均固定资产投资(万元)
    农村技术进步(tech农林牧渔业单位产值农用机械总动力(kW/万元)
    农村劳动生产率(prod农村单位劳动力农林牧渔业产出(万元)
    农村扶贫政策(poli农村低保人口与总人口之比(%)
    Table 1. Variable description and explanation
    变量样本数均值方差最小值最大值
    pove21610.12558.61240.000045.1000
    urb_p21652.68408.333933.810069.8500
    urb_l2161.03720.94660.02004.3100
    urb_e21641.81255.881128.600056.1000
    gdp_g2169.81212.8180-2.500017.1000
    u_r_d2162.77820.44322.06004.0700
    empl2163.39420.54601.73004.4700
    huma2168.30590.32207.43009.0700
    mart2160.47190.32130.11002.0400
    capi2160.15800.05420.06000.3700
    tech2161.28820.53840.39002.7000
    prod21681.303437.162117.6600178.7300
    poli2167.88154.94411.090023.5300
    Table 2. Descriptive statistics
    年份poveurb_purb_lurb_e
    Moran′s IPMoran′s IPMoran′s IPMoran′s IP
    20100.476<0.0010.3300.0020.379<0.0010.2020.027
    20110.511<0.0010.3070.0030.381<0.0010.1710.048
    20120.501<0.0010.2910.0050.392<0.0010.1420.078
    20130.490<0.0010.2930.0050.400<0.0010.1390.082
    20140.496<0.0010.2860.0050.498<0.0010.0160.334
    20150.492<0.0010.2930.0050.409<0.001-0.1550.182
    20160.457<0.0010.3010.0040.396<0.001-0.1840.128
    20170.453<0.0010.3020.0040.406<0.001-0.0450.481
    Table 3. Global Moran's I of rural poverty and urbanization in provinces of China from 2010 to 2017
    普通OLS模型检验统计量数值P空间面板模型检验统计量数值P
    F值68.26<0.001Hausman72.73<0.001
    Adj R20.82Robust Hausman210.99<0.001
    LM_Spatial error26.86<0.001Wald_Spatial error61.66<0.001
    Robust LM_Spatial error0.240.623LR_Spatial error69.13<0.001
    LM_Spatial lag62.57<0.001Wald_Spatial lag55.91<0.001
    Robust LM_Spatial lag35.96<0.001LR_Spatial lag51.11<0.001
    Table 4. Results of model test
    变量SPDMSPLMSPEM非空间固定效应SPDM空间滞后项(WX
    空间固定时间固定双固定空间固定空间固定空间固定时间固定双固定
    模型(1)模型(2)模型(3)模型(4)模型(5)模型(6)模型(1)模型(2)模型(3)
    urb_p-3.851***-3.279***-4.035***-3.758***-4.232***-4.524***-1.733-5.248***-2.637**
    (-8.63)(-7.02)(-9.02)(-9.56)(-10.05)(-5.29)(-1.52)(-4.60)(-2.27)
    (urb_p)20.039***0.029***0.039***0.031***0.036***0.034***0.0120.057***0.023*
    (8.37)(6.25)(8.55)(7.48)(8.21)(3.64)(1.01)(5.07)(1.81)
    urb_l1.848-7.626***3.8455.0682.32611.2859.828-7.051**18.255*
    (0.42)(-5.69)(0.87)(1.26)(0.53)(1.45)(1.04)(-2.34)(1.84)
    (urb_l)20.1491.670***-0.302-0.475-0.835-1.314-1.9841.108-1.629
    (0.26)(5.71)(-0.50)(-0.89)(-1.44)(-1.45)(-1.25)(1.42)(-1.00)
    urb_e1.100***1.319***0.773*0.397-0.2180.0171.624**-0.4201.247
    (2.93)(3.07)(1.85)(1.21)(-0.60)(0.02)(2.18)(-0.44)(1.26)
    (urb_e)2-0.013***-0.017***-0.010**-0.006*0.001-0.003-0.022**-0.011-0.019*
    (-3.16)(-3.37)(-1.98)(-1.68)(0.31)(-0.31)(-2.55)(-0.95)(-1.68)
    gdp_g-0.0130.076-0.1190.0630.0060.2260.222-0.925***-0.436*
    (-0.12)(0.57)(-1.14)(0.64)(0.05)(1.23)(1.08)(-3.11)(-1.67)
    u_r_d0.3781.081-0.049-1.1222.612*-0.236-3.250-6.638***-1.689
    (0.25)(1.01)(-0.03)(-0.90)(1.81)(-0.08)(-1.36)(-2.99)(-0.48)
    empl1.898***-2.014***1.787***2.093***2.422***3.340***3.418**1.915*1.815
    (3.18)(-5.02)(3.05)(3.50)(3.70)(3.44)(2.07)(1.66)(1.05)
    huma-1.5723.118***-1.372-3.739***-3.697***-5.409**1.814-0.2664.269
    (-1.24)(2.85)(-1.09)(-2.79)(-2.75)(-2.62)(0.69)(-0.10)(1.47)
    mart3.038-5.176***3.1792.1863.259**4.071*-5.708-0.170-5.400
    (1.52)(-3.89)(1.63)(1.46)(2.02)(1.75)(-1.50)(-0.05)(-1.31)
    capi-25.592***-5.970-27.078***-21.471***-26.196***-27.301-13.473-60.926***2.430
    (-4.02)(-1.13)(-4.20)(-4.20)(-4.94)(-1.25)(-1.01)(-4.66)(0.16)
    tech0.6900.3920.5780.3350.8840.203-0.8431.815-0.691
    (1.04)(0.54)(0.87)(0.52)(1.37)(0.18)(-0.62)(1.25)(-0.44)
    prod-0.039**-0.037***-0.041**-0.022-0.039**-0.0380.016-0.100***0.021
    (-2.05)(-2.99)(-2.14)(-1.38)(-2.03)(-1.68)(0.49)(-3.27)(0.59)
    poli0.249***0.0960.231***0.092**0.196***0.115**-0.178**0.214-0.108
    (3.70)(1.13)(3.50)(2.17)(2.63)(2.17)(-2.30)(1.49)(-1.00)
    ρ/λ0.361***0.205**0.0800.465***0.780***
    R20.9360.8290.3210.9140.8360.889
    Log L-386.542-475.152-373.455-415.473-429.328-449.930
    Table 5. Estimation of spatial and non-spatial panel fixed effects model
    变量直接效应间接效应总效应
    系数P系数P系数P
    urb_p-4.148***<0.001-4.669***0.004-8.817***<0.001
    (urb_p)20.041***<0.0010.040**0.0360.081***<0.001
    urb_l3.2450.47014.0000.32117.2460.289
    (urb_l)2-0.0830.886-2.6970.249-2.7800.286
    urb_e1.294***0.0012.984***0.0094.278***0.002
    (urb_e)2-0.016***<0.001-0.039***0.003-0.055***0.001
    gdp_g0.0120.9130.3240.2570.3350.282
    u_r_d0.0450.974-4.6020.186-4.5570.194
    empl2.354***<0.0016.244**0.0198.598***0.005
    huma-1.4340.3041.7760.6960.3410.949
    mart2.5450.260-6.6030.307-4.0590.616
    capi-27.285***<0.001-32.802*0.095-60.087***0.010
    tech0.6330.353-0.7670.705-0.1340.954
    prod-0.040**0.0370.0060.902-0.0340.147
    poli0.244***<0.001-0.1270.1590.1170.538
    Table 6. Decomposed spatial effects of SPDM with spatial fixed effects
    Bosheng ZHANG, Zisheng YANG. Rural poverty reduction and its spatial spillover effects of Chinese urbanization: Based on the analysis of spatial econometric model with provincial panel data[J]. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(7): 1592
    Download Citation