• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 15, Issue 3, 031401 (2017)
Juan Du1、2, Yanguang Sun1, Dijun Chen1、*, Yongji Mu1, Minjie Huang1, Zhongguo Yang1, Jiqiao Liu1, Decang Bi1, Xia Hou1, and Weibiao Chen1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Space Laser Communication and Detection Technology, Shanghai Institute of Fine Mechanics and Optics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL201715.031401 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Juan Du, Yanguang Sun, Dijun Chen, Yongji Mu, Minjie Huang, Zhongguo Yang, Jiqiao Liu, Decang Bi, Xia Hou, Weibiao Chen. Frequency-stabilized laser system at 1572  nm for space-borne CO2 detection LIDAR[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2017, 15(3): 031401 Copy Citation Text show less
    Absolute frequency locking setup for the ML.
    Fig. 1. Absolute frequency locking setup for the ML.
    (a) Profile of the custom-built astigmatism Herriott cell. (b) Space and energy distributions of the light spot of the astigmatism Herriott cell shown in (a).
    Fig. 2. (a) Profile of the custom-built astigmatism Herriott cell. (b) Space and energy distributions of the light spot of the astigmatism Herriott cell shown in (a).
    (a) Schematic of the noise test of the CO2 cell. (b) Experimental results of CO2 cell noise test. Detailed MPI noise is also shown, of which the amplitude is about 2 mV.
    Fig. 3. (a) Schematic of the noise test of the CO2 cell. (b) Experimental results of CO2 cell noise test. Detailed MPI noise is also shown, of which the amplitude is about 2 mV.
    Relationship between the error signal and the relative frequency.
    Fig. 4. Relationship between the error signal and the relative frequency.
    (a) Frequency stabilization test of the ML. (b) Details of the beat note shown in (a). (c) Allan deviation of the ML.
    Fig. 5. (a) Frequency stabilization test of the ML. (b) Details of the beat note shown in (a). (c) Allan deviation of the ML.
    OPLL system for the offline-seeder laser and online-seeder laser; LO, local signal; PFD, phase-frequency detector.
    Fig. 6. OPLL system for the offline-seeder laser and online-seeder laser; LO, local signal; PFD, phase-frequency detector.
    (a) Frequency drift of online-seeder laser when offset locked to the ML at 760 MHz after being divided by eight using the OPLL setup shown in Fig. 6. (b) Frequency drift of offline-seeder laser when offset locked to the ML at 7.616 GHz after being divided by 64 using the OPLL setup shown in Fig. 6.
    Fig. 7. (a) Frequency drift of online-seeder laser when offset locked to the ML at 760 MHz after being divided by eight using the OPLL setup shown in Fig. 6. (b) Frequency drift of offline-seeder laser when offset locked to the ML at 7.616 GHz after being divided by 64 using the OPLL setup shown in Fig. 6.
    Juan Du, Yanguang Sun, Dijun Chen, Yongji Mu, Minjie Huang, Zhongguo Yang, Jiqiao Liu, Decang Bi, Xia Hou, Weibiao Chen. Frequency-stabilized laser system at 1572  nm for space-borne CO2 detection LIDAR[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2017, 15(3): 031401
    Download Citation