• Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves
  • Vol. 41, Issue 5, 850 (2022)
Biao WANG1, Yi-Wei HUO2, Xing GUO1、*, and Jia-Ji WU1
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Electronic Engineering,Xidian University,Xi'an 710071,China
  • 2Science and Technology on Electromagnetic Scattering Laboratory,Shanghai 200438,China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2022.05.008 Cite this Article
    Biao WANG, Yi-Wei HUO, Xing GUO, Jia-Ji WU. Relationship between radar reflectivity factor and ice water content of non-spherical cirrus ice crystals at 220 GHz[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2022, 41(5): 850 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    For the practical needs in the data processing of terahertz radar,the discrete dipole approximation method is used to calculate the backscattering cross-section of non-spherical ice crystals with different shapes. Based on the latest refined ice cloud model, the relationship between the radar reflectivity factor Zm and ice water content I in 220 GHz is established. The calculation results show that both the shapes of the non-spherical ice crystals and the ice cloud model have a particular influence on the Zm-I relationship. This study has application value for cloud parameter inversion of mid-latitude cirrus clouds, and it can be helpful for the development of terahertz radar in the detection of clouds.

    Introduction

    Cirrus is a critical factor of global radiation balance and is one of the primary sources of uncertainty in satellite inversion and climate model research. The scattering of light by ice crystals not only has effect on the radiation balance of the Earth-atmosphere system but also plays a significant role in the development of many small-scale and even weather-scale precipitation in the middle and high latitudes. Millimeter-wave radars can examine the physical structure,dynamic and small-scale turbulence of clouds,ice water content and recognize ice clouds and water clouds.Cloud radar on CloudSat at 94 GHz can be used to study internal horizontal and vertical structure of cloud1.

    Remote sensing of cloud can be divided into active and passive modes,including microwave radar,microwave radiometer,Lidar et al. The information of cloud top and cloud water path can be obtained by the microwave radiometer. Microwave radar,suitable for detecting cloud particles with a diameter of more than 100 microns,can be utilized to obtain cloud vertical structure information. Lidars can detect tiny particles on a micron- scale;however,it can only receive cloud surface information because of its insufficient cloud penetration ability. Terahertz waves lie between the microwave and infrared waves. The terahertz waves are in the Mie scattering region for the large cloud particles,whereas they are in the Rayleigh scattering region for the small cloud particles. As is known,the backscattering of the cloud particles in the Rayleigh scattering region is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the detection wavelength. Thus,the smaller cloud particles have stronger scattering to the terahertz wave. The backscattering of particles in the Mie scattering region is stronger than that in the Rayleigh scattering region. In addition,the study of Hogan at the University of Reading in the United Kingdom shows that low-frequency terahertz waves have great potential for the detection of ice clouds in the atmosphere(mostly 5 to 10 microns in diameter)2. Therefore,compared to microwave radar,terahertz radar can detect smaller ice cloud particles,which can be used as a necessary complement to cloud remote sensing.

    The terahertz cloud radar utilizes the scattering characteristics of cloud particles on electromagnetic waves. By the analysis of the radar echo the cloud which reflects the macroscopic and microscopic structure of the cloud,we can understand the various characteristics of the cloud. The reflectivity factor values of the cloud can be estimated by measuring the echo intensity,and further,the information of the ice water content and particle size of the cloud. Combined with other observation methods,such as microwave radiometers to measure temperature,humidity,and additional information,more advanced meteorological products can be produced.

    In 2012,Leinonen proposed that idealized homogeneous spheroidal models of ice crystals and snowflakes cannot consistently describe radar backscattering from a snowfall when the radar wavelengths are on the order of the snowflake size by analyzing collocated airborne radar measurements at 13.4 GHz,35.6 GHz and 94 GHz3.The accuracy of cloud parameter inversion depends on the accuracy of the measurement and forward model. Therefore,to deal with the data processing requirements of terahertz radar,the scattering characteristics of cirrus ice crystals in terahertz are studied in this work. And further,the model between radar reflectivity factor and ice cloud microphysical parameters is utilized to fit the Zm-I relational expression. It provides a model for the inversion of cirrus parameters,which can be used as a reference for using terahertz cloud radar.

    1 Basic theory

    Cirrus clouds,which contain numerous ice crystals with different shapes,belong to the high-rise clouds. The thickness of cirrus clouds ranges from a few hundred meters to 5~7 kilometers,typically 1.5 to 2 kilometers. The horizontal extent ranges from a few kilometers to thousands of kilometers,covering an average of 20%~30% of Earth's sky,which results in a strong influence of the Earth's and atmospheric radiation,and further the weather and climate formation process. The ice cloud model is very complex. The scattering and attenuation characteristics are related to the complex shape and size of the particles and the incident wavelength. The maximum size of the non-spherical ice crystal particles can reach several millimeters. In the accurate radar inversion,it is not enough to treat the ice crystal grains as the Mie scattering ball or ellipsoid. Figure 1 shows six common non-spherical ice crystals4.

    Ice crystals of different shapes

    Figure 1.Ice crystals of different shapes

    Serial numberIce crystalsContent(%)Maximum dimensions(μm)
    1Droxtal100D<60
    2Bullet rosette1560<D<1 000
    Hexagonal column50
    Hexagonal plate35
    3Hexagonal column451 000<D<2 500
    Solid hexagonal column45
    Aggregate10
    4Bullet rosette97D>2 500
    Aggregate3

    Table 1. New feature distribution of cirrus ice crystals

    Simple shapes of ice crystals can be described by length L and maximum dimensions D. There is an empirical relationship between length L and half width a5.

    1)For a hexagonal column particle of width a,and length LL=Da=0.35L when L<100 μm;when L>100 μm,a=3.48L0.5.

    2)For plate-shaped particles,L=2.4883a0.474D=2a,when a≥5 μm.

    3)The surface ratio of the bullet rosette particle is related to the length of each branch of the flower pattern. Generally,the particle length and the half-width have a statistical relationship a=1.552L0.63D=2(L+t).

    4)Aggregate particles are generally considered to be formed after the polymerization of bullet-type ice crystal grains. The statistical relationship between the half-width a and the particle length L is a=1.1552L0.63D=7.297L,and the branch tip of the bullet type particle satisfies the width t=30.5/2tan(α),where α represents the inclination to the main axis.

    5)Droxtal particles are generally regarded as spherical particles.

    The measurement data of cirrus in China is relatively small. In contrast,the measurement of the physical characteristics of mid-latitude and tropical cirrus in foreign countries was carried out earlier,and the data is more comprehensive. At present,the typical measurement data includes FIRE-I,FIRE-II,ARM,TRMM,and CRYSTAL FACE. Field campaigns located in the mid-latitude include the First International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project Regional Experiments in Madison,Wisconsin,in 1986(FIRE-I)and Coffeyville,Kansas in 1991(FIRE-II). The distribution of particle size and crystal habit imagery from FIRE-II were obtained from balloon-borne replicators over a size range from about 10 to 500~1 000 meters. Another mid-latitude dataset was derived in the spring of 2 000 during an Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program(ARM)intensive observation period near Lamont,Oklahom. In 1998 and 1999,four field campaigns were conducted under the auspices of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission(TRMM). In addition,recent high-quality measurements have been acquired during the Cirrus Regional Study of Tropical Anvils and Cirrus Layers(CRYSTAL)Florida Area Cirrus Experiment(FACE)during a series of flights by the NASA WB57 aircraft and the UND Citation in 2002.

    In 2005,after fitting the physical property data in the above five mid-latitude regions and the tropical cirrus database,Baum proposed a new feature distribution of cirrus ice crystals listed in Table 16. The ice crystal habit distribution in the model consists of 100% droxtals when D < 60 mm,15% bullet rosettes,50% solid columns,and 35% plates when 60 mm < D < 1 000 mm,45% hollow columns,45% solid columns,and 10% aggregates when 1 000 mm < D < 2 500 mm,and 97% bullet rosettes and 3% aggregates when D > 2 500 mm. As shown in Fig. 2,the calculated value agrees well with the actual value,so the feature distribution is applied to calculate the water content and the radar efficiency factor of cirrus in the terahertz band.

    Comparison of the water content calculated by refined ice cloud model with real values[6]

    Figure 2.Comparison of the water content calculated by refined ice cloud model with real values6

    Figure 3 shows the particle size distribution of the cirrus particles obtained from the measured data of the mid-latitude cirrus(FIRE-I,FIRE-II,ARM)and tropical cirrus(CRYSTAL,TRMM)7. The obtained distribution of different measured data satisfies the gamma distribution ND)which can be described as6

    ND=N0Dμe-βD=N0Dμe-b+μ+0.67DmD

    The measured data of the latitudinal cirrus particle size distribution[6]

    Figure 3.The measured data of the latitudinal cirrus particle size distribution6

    where D is the maximum dimensions of ice crystal grains,β is the slope,and μ is the divergence. The liquid ice water content(I)is related to the distribution function8

    I=ρDminDmaxi=1NfiDViDNDdD

    where ρ is ice density,fiD)is the habit distribution,of ice crystals,i=1NfiD=1,and ViD)is the volume in the case of a given D. The ice water content in the cloud is calculated from a single ice crystal grain or a mixture of different ice crystal grains. The proportion of different shapes of ice crystals in the cloud can be determined according to the size of D and the ice water content in the ice cloud can be obtained by a weighted average.

    The relationship between ice water content I (g/m3)and Dm and ice crystal spectrum6 is

    Dm=b+μ+0.67β
    I=cN0Γb+1+μβb+1+μ

    where N0β,and μ are defined by equation(1)c=6590,b=2.3,and Dm is the median of the droplet spectrum. Different I and Dm can be used to determine different parameters N0 and β,thus determining different ice crystals.

    The radar reflectivity factor is a meteorological parameter related to the distribution of cloud particles. It is an intrinsic property of the cloud and does not change with detection methods9. The properties of the radar reflectivity factor are reflected in its definition. For non-spherical ice crystal particles,the radar reflectivity factor is defined as equation(5). In radar meteorology,the millimeter is usually used as the dimension of the maximum dimensions D of the water droplet,and considering the summation on a unit volume of 1 m3,the Z unit is usually mm6/m3

    Zm=λ4π5Ki2DminDmaxi=1NfiDσihhDNDdD

    where λ is the incident wavelength,and Ki equals to(m2-1)/(m2+1),where m is the complex refractive index of the ice crystal grains. Therefore,if we know the characteristics of the ice cloud(such as the distribution of the cloud droplet spectrum),we can theoretically calculate the radar reflectivity factor value.

    The calculation of the backscattering cross-section of non-spherical ice crystals is based on the discrete dipole approximation(DDA)method10. It is well-suited for studying the scattering and absorption properties of non-spherical particles,which can be of any shape and heterogeneity. The main principle is to approximate the actual particles with a finite array of discrete and interacting small dipoles that must be sufficient to describe the particles they simulate both in shape and electromagnetic properties;in other words,both of the actual particles and the simulated dipoles have the same discrete relationship. Then,the study of the actual particle scattering properties is transformed into the study of the small dipole scattering properties in these small cubes of side length d. When performing theoretical calculations,the condition |m|(2π/λ)d<1 must be satisfied,m is the complex refractive index of the particles,and λ is the wavelength. The more the value of |m|(2π/λ)d is smaller than 1,the more accurate the theoretical calculation results are.

    2 Results and discussion

    The shape and size of the ice crystal were considered in the backscattering section calculation process. The ice cloud model selected in this paper contains six ice crystal grains,and the backscattering sections of the hexagonal column and the hollow hexagonal column are basically the same. Based on the relationship between different ice crystallites L and a,the DDA algorithm was utilized to calculate the backscattering cross- section of six common non-spherical ice crystals shown in Fig. 1.

    The temperature was set to 253 K,the frequency was 220 GHz,and the complex refractive index of ice is 1.78+0.0039i. The variation on the backscattering cross section of the ice crystal with the maximum scale in the range of 50~5 000 μm is shown in Fig. 4. It can be seen from the figure that the backscattering cross section of ice crystals with different shapes increases from the increase in the maximum dimension D of the ice crystal grains,and the droxtal contributes more to the backscattering.

    Variation of backscattering cross section of ice crystals with different shapes of the maximum dimension D

    Figure 4.Variation of backscattering cross section of ice crystals with different shapes of the maximum dimension D

    In the terahertz radar detection application,it is usually assumed that there is a relationship between the ice water content I and the radar reflectivity factor Zm

    I=aZmb .

    The value of N0 and β can be calculated according to the range of the median Dm and ice water content of ice crystals in the cloud. The range of Dm and I are 0.01≤Dm≤0.1 cm and 10-4I≤10-1(g/m3)respectively. In the above field,1 000 times(representing 1 000 kinds of ice crystal spectrum distribution were sampled according to the normal distribution Dm:n(0.05,0.0242)and I:n(0.05,0.0242)). Then Dm and I were substituted for equation(5) to calculate Zm in each case. Thus,the Zm-I relationship of different shapes of ice crystal at 220 GHz was obtained. It can be seen from Fig. 5 that there is a significant difference in the Zm-I relationship of ice crystals with different shapes. The non-spherical ice crystal grains have a specific influence on the Zm-I relationship. Treating ice crystal grains as spherical particles cannot fully reflect the Zm-I relationship.

    Zm-I relationship of (a) aggregate, (b) droxtal, (c) hexagonal column, (d) plate, (e) bullet rosette

    Figure 5.Zm-I relationship of (a) aggregate, (b) droxtal, (c) hexagonal column, (d) plate, (e) bullet rosette

    In addition,combined with the ice cloud model provided by Baum et al.,the Zm-I relationship of different shapes of ice crystal particles was calculated. It can be seen from Fig. 6 that the aggregate and the droxtal have little influence on the Zm-I relationship,whereas the bullet rosette has the most significant effect on it. In addition,the particle size distribution of the ice cloud model has a significant impact on the radar reflectivity factor.

    Zm-I relationship of mixed ice crystal grains

    Figure 6.Zm-I relationship of mixed ice crystal grains

    Combined with the same ice cloud model and simulation method,the Zm-I relationship of different shapes of ice crystal particles was calculated at 94 GHz711-13.Fig. 7 shows the comparison of the relationships between equivalent radar reflectivity factor Z and ice water content I derived in this study and four other algorithms for ice clouds from previous studies. Atlas and Liu are the measured value,and Teng and Hong are the simulated values. The present research results are relatively close to the measured value of Atlas and quite different from the simulated values of Teng and Hong. These Zm-I relationships show pronounced differences. This reveals that the Zm-I relationship is strongly sensitive to the microphysical properties of ice clouds,such as the ice crystal habits,mixtures of ice crystal habits,and particle size distributions. Obviously,there is no universal Zm-I relationship to all ice clouds.

    Comparison of the relationships between Zm and I derived in this study and other algorithms for ice clouds from previous studies at 94 GHz

    Figure 7.Comparison of the relationships between Zm and I derived in this study and other algorithms for ice clouds from previous studies at 94 GHz

    The solid line in Fig. 8 is the fit of the relationship between the radar reflectivity factor and the ice water content obtained by using the EUCREX aircraft to measure the mid-latitude cirrus at 215 GHz for 15 hours14. We compare fitted measurements of 215 GHz with theZm-I relationship model of the 220 GHz mixed ice crystals and spherical particles obtained in this paper. The root mean square error between the measured data and the simulated result of mixed ice crystals and spherical particles are 0.50 and 0.57. The correlation coefficient between the measured data and the simulated value of mixed ice crystals and spherical particles are 0.99 and 0.95. The source of error is mainly the difference between the parameter selection of the simulation calculation and the natural environment.

    Comparison of simulated data at 220 GH and measured data at 215 GHz

    Figure 8.Comparison of simulated data at 220 GH and measured data at 215 GHz

    3 Conclusions

    In this paper,the DDA method was applied to calculate the backscattering cross-section of a single ice crystal with different shapes. Then the Zm-I relation model of different non-spherical ice crystals was obtained by the refined feature distribution model. In this study,we find the Zm-I relationship is strongly sensitive to the microphysical properties of ice clouds,such as the ice crystal habits,mixtures of ice crystal habits,and particle size distributions. The results show the model with mixed ice crystal particles better fits with experimental data than the single spherical particle model. Later,the characteristic distribution of ice crystals of different heights will be considered to optimize the Zm-I relationship model.

    References

    [1] Ling-Zhi ZHONG, Li-Ping LIU, G E Runsheng. Characteristics about the millimeter-wavelength radar and its status and prospect in and abroad. Advances in Earth Science, 24, 383-391(2009).

    [2] R J Hogan, P R Field, A J Illingworth et al. Properties of embedded convection in warm‐frontal mixed‐phase cloud from aircraft and polarimetric radar. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 128, 451-476(2002).

    [3] J Leinonen, S Kneifel, D Moisseev et al. Evidence of nonspherical behavior in millimeter-wavelength radar observations of snowfall. Journal of Geophysical Research, 117(2012).

    [4] Hong GANG. Radar backscattering properties of nonspherical ice crystals at 94 GHz. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 112(2007).

    [5] Hong GANG. Parameterization of scattering and absorption properties of nonspherical ice crystals at microwave frequencies. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 112(2007).

    [6] B A Baum, Ping YANG, J Heymsfield Andrew et al. Bulk Scattering Properties for the Remote Sensing of Ice Clouds. Part II: Narrowband Models. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 44, 1896-1911(2005).

    [7] B A Baum, Ping YANG, J Heymsfield Andrew et al. Bulk Scattering Properties for the Remote Sensing of Ice Clouds. Part I: Microphysical Data and Models. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 44, 1885-1895(2005).

    [8] Hong GANG, Ping YANG, B A Baum et al. Relationship between ice water content and equivalent radar reflectivity for clouds consisting of nonspherical ice particles. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 113(2008).

    [9] K Sato, H Okamoto. Characterization of Ze and LDR of nonspherical and inhomogeneous ice particles for 95-GHz cloud radar: Its implication to microphysical retrievals. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111(2006).

    [10] B T Draine, P J Flatau. Discrete-Dipole approximation for scattering calculations. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 11, 1491-1499(1994).

    [11] Xu TENG. Sensitivity of the W band airborne cloud radar reflectivity factor Z to cloud parameters(2011).

    [12] D Atlas, Y Matrosov Sergey, A J Heymsfield et al. Radar and radiation properties of ice clouds. Journal of applied meteorology, 34, 2329-2345(1995).

    [13] Chun-Lei LIU, J Illingworth Anthony. Toward more accurate retrievals of ice water Content from radar measurements of clouds. Journal of applied meteorology, 39, 1130-1146(2000).

    Biao WANG, Yi-Wei HUO, Xing GUO, Jia-Ji WU. Relationship between radar reflectivity factor and ice water content of non-spherical cirrus ice crystals at 220 GHz[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2022, 41(5): 850
    Download Citation