Baojun Zhu1、2, Zhe Zhang1、3, Chang Liu4, Dawei Yuan5, Weiman Jiang1, Huigang Wei5, Fang Li1, Yihang Zhang1, Bo Han6, Lei Cheng1, Shangqing Li1, Jiayong Zhong6, Xiaoxia Yuan7, Bowei Tong6, Wei Sun6, Zhiheng Fang8, Chen Wang8, Zhiyong Xie8, Neng Hua9, Rong Wu9, Zhanfeng Qiao9, Guiyun Liang5, Baoqiang Zhu9, Jianqiang Zhu9, Shinsuke Fujioka2, and Yutong Li0、1、3
Author Affiliations
0School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China1Beijing National Laboratory of Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, CAS, Beijing 100190, China2Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, 2-6 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, Japan3Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan, Guangdong 523808, China4Department of Advanced Photon Research, Kansai Photon Science Institute, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 619-0215 Kyoto, Japan5Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China6Department of Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China7Center for Advanced Material Diagnostic Technology, College of Engineering Physics, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen 518118, China8Shanghai Institute of Laser Plasma, Shanghai 201800, China9National Laboratory on High Power Laser and Physics, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, Chinashow less
DOI: 10.1063/5.0060954
Cite this Article
Baojun Zhu, Zhe Zhang, Chang Liu, Dawei Yuan, Weiman Jiang, Huigang Wei, Fang Li, Yihang Zhang, Bo Han, Lei Cheng, Shangqing Li, Jiayong Zhong, Xiaoxia Yuan, Bowei Tong, Wei Sun, Zhiheng Fang, Chen Wang, Zhiyong Xie, Neng Hua, Rong Wu, Zhanfeng Qiao, Guiyun Liang, Baoqiang Zhu, Jianqiang Zhu, Shinsuke Fujioka, Yutong Li. Observation of Zeeman splitting effect in a laser-driven coil[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2022, 7(2): 024402
Copy Citation Text
show less
Fig. 1. (a) Experimental setup. (b) Configuration of Ω-shaped coil. (c) Configuration of closed-loop coil.
Fig. 2. Temporal evolution of the measured B-field strength at the position of the B-dot probe. The vertical error bars correspond to the standard deviation of two shots.
Fig. 3. Calculated two-dimensional magnetic field distribution in the x–y plane at z = 0: (a) Ω-shaped coil; (b) closed-loop coil.
Fig. 4. Shadowgraphs in the x–y plane: (a) before laser shot; (b) at a delay time t = 3.5 ns; (c) at a delay time t = 6.0 ns. The dark regions demonstrate that the plasma density is so high that the probe light cannot penetrate it.
Fig. 5. (a) Comparison between the observed spectra from the Ω-shaped and closed-loop coils and the Cu I spectrum obtained from the NIST Atomic Spectra Database at Te = 0.8 eV. (b) Comparison between the observed spectrum from the closed-loop coil and calculated spectra: the red dashed curve is the Voigt fitting for the closed-loop coil spectrum at 521.47 nm, and the green dotted curve is one typical PrismSPECT Cu I line shape convolved with instrumental broadening computed at Te = 0.8 eV and ne = 2 × 1017 cm−3. (c) Comparison between the observed spectrum from the Ω-shaped coil and the calculated Voigt spectrum.
Fig. 6. FWHM of line at transition (3) as a function of electron density ne computed with PrismSPECT at Te = 0.8 eV.
Theoretical wavelength (nm) | 510.5541 | 515.3235 | 521.8202 | Experimental π wavelength (nm) | 510.42 | 515.16 | 521.47 | Transition | 3d104p2P03/2 | 3d104d2D3/2 | 3d104d2D5/2 | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | 3d94s22D5/2 | 3d104p2P01/2 | 3d104p2P03/2 | Upper energy level E (eV) | 3.82 | 6.19 | 6.19 | A (s−1) | 2.0 × 106 | 6.0 × 107 | 7.5 × 107 | gk | 4 | 4 | 6 | Doppler shift (nm) | 0.1341 | 0.1635 | 0.3502 | Velocity (km/s) | 81.6 | 98.6 | 208.6 | Average velocity (km/s) | | 129.6 ± 39.8 | | Splitting ΔλB between σ and π (nm) | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.39 | Bcenter (T) | 32.0 ± 16.0 | 31.4 ± 15.7 | 30.7 ± 15.4 | Average Bcenter (T) | | 31.4 ± 15.7 | |
|
Table 1. Summary of spectra.