• Journal of Applied Optics
  • Vol. 44, Issue 1, 159 (2023)
Binghua HU* and Hui YAN
Author Affiliations
  • Chinese Flight Test Establishment, Xi'an 710089, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.5768/JAO202344.0103007 Cite this Article
    Binghua HU, Hui YAN. 3D dynamic deformation measurement and visual analysis of helicopter rotor[J]. Journal of Applied Optics, 2023, 44(1): 159 Copy Citation Text show less
    Composition of rotor dynamic deformation measurement and visual analysis system
    Fig. 1. Composition of rotor dynamic deformation measurement and visual analysis system
    Composition of integrated servo video acquisition and processing subsystem and signal transmission structure of whole system
    Fig. 2. Composition of integrated servo video acquisition and processing subsystem and signal transmission structure of whole system
    Process diagram of real-time data processing of system
    Fig. 3. Process diagram of real-time data processing of system
    Schematic diagram of camera layout
    Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of camera layout
    Flow chart of detection, identification and matching of coded mark points
    Fig. 5. Flow chart of detection, identification and matching of coded mark points
    Algorithm implementation process of helicopter rotor deformation measurement based on digital speckle correlation
    Fig. 6. Algorithm implementation process of helicopter rotor deformation measurement based on digital speckle correlation
    Connection topology diagram of 3D measurement test system
    Fig. 7. Connection topology diagram of 3D measurement test system
    Reconstruction results
    Fig. 8. Reconstruction results
    Motion change curves of adjacent two points on plate
    Fig. 9. Motion change curves of adjacent two points on plate
    Motion change curves of two points along longitudinal distance on plate
    Fig. 10. Motion change curves of two points along longitudinal distance on plate
    点号全站仪测量数据全场变形测量软件计算数据坐标对比/mm
    Xc/mmYc/mmZc/mmX/mmY/mmZ/mmdXdYdZ
    36980.0−9.71 156.8979.8−7.31 160.0−0.22.43.2
    37560.011.0930.5560.612.2933.70.61.23.2
    381 019.112.7505.91 020.713.5506.71.60.80.8
    39613.132.2314.1614.732.6317.11.60.43.0
    401 055.582.6−5.71 056.183.6−2.50.61.03.2
    41982.2203.3−483.5983.0204.1−480.90.80.82.6
    42555.8136.7−240.9556.6136.5−238.50.8−0.22.4
    43695.1285.9−847.5695.7285.1−846.30.6−0.81.2
    441 096.3347.5−1 056.31 096.7347.3−1 055.50.4−0.20.8
    451 555.8269.8−864.11 558.4269.8−863.92.60.00.2
    461 374.7142.7−281.41 375.7143.7−278.81.01.02.6
    471 410.748.5174.71 410.350.3178.5−0.41.83.8
    481 456.73.9665.71 457.56.3667.70.82.42.0
    491 338.0427.1−1 140.51 339.0428.3−1 138.11.01.22.4
    50960.0597.6−1 157.2959.8598.2−1 154.6−0.20.62.6
    Min-error/mm0.20.00.2
    Max-error/mm2.62.43.8
    Mean square error/mm1.11.22.5
    Table 1. Comparison and analysis of visual measurement calculation results of coded mark points and measurement data of total station