Author Affiliations
1School of Electronic Engineering and Optoelectronic Technology, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, China2College of Science, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, China3College of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Schematic of total focusing
Fig. 2. Schematic of total focusing for forming elliptic trajectories
Fig. 3. Directionality diagram of shear waves
Fig. 4. Schematics of UNROLL. (a) Before optimization; (b) after optimization
Fig. 5. Schematics of PIPELINE. (a) Before optimization; (b) after optimization
Fig. 6. Schematics of dual-core optimization of PS. (a) Shared peripheral communication diagram; (b) schematic before and after using dual-core design
Fig. 7. Diagram of experimental setup
Fig. 8. Scan diagrams of generation laser and detection laser
Fig. 9. Algorithm flow chart based on ZYNQ
Fig. 10. Results obtained using laser ultrasonic TFM. (a) TFM image without generation direction coefficients; (b) TFM image with generation direction coefficients; (c) side view of TFM image without generation direction coefficients; (d) side view of TFM image with generation direction coefficients
Fig. 11. Results obtained using laser ultrasonic SAFT. (a) SAFT image without generation direction coefficients; (b) SAFT image with generation direction coefficients; (c) side view of SAFT image without generation direction coefficients; (d) side view of SAFT image with generation direction coefficients
Fig. 12. TFM images based on ZYNQ. (a) Front view; (b) side view
Resource | Utilization number | Available number | Utilization rate /% |
---|
LUT | 42969 | 53200 | 80.77 | LUTRAM | 2621 | 17400 | 15.06 | FF | 41335 | 106400 | 38.85 | BRAM | 3 | 140 | 2.14 | DSP | 90 | 220 | 40.91 | BUFG | 1 | 32 | 3.13 |
|
Table 1. Usage of on-board resources
TFIM calculation tool | Time /s | Cost /yuan |
---|
PC-based TFM | 602.6 | 5000 | ZYNQ-based TFM | 82.6 | 1500 |
|
Table 2. Comparison of running time and cost between ZYNQ-based TFM and PC-based TFM