Fig. 1. AlMgScZr alloy powder. (a) Morphology of powder; (b) size distribution
Fig. 2. Relative densities of specimens fabricated under different scanning speeds
Fig. 3. Microstructures of longitudinal section of AlMgScZr alloy formed at 1200 mm/s scanning speed. (a) OM image; (b) SEM image
Fig. 4. TEM images of longitudinal section of AlMgScZr alloy formed at 1200 mm/s scanning speed. (a) Bright-field image; (b) local enlargement of Fig. 4(a); (c) precipitated phase in fine grain region and its corresponding HRTRM image and FFT image; (d) precipitated phase in coarse grain region and its corresponding HRTEM image and FFT image
Fig. 5. IPFs and grain size distributions of different specimens. (a)
(c) IPFs; (d)
(f) grain size distributions
Fig. 6. Grain boundary mappings and grain boundary misorientation angle distributions of different specimens. (a)
(c) Grain boundary mappings; (d)
(f) grain boundary misorientation angle distributions
Fig. 7. Potentiodynamic polarization curves for specimens #1, #2, #3 in NaCl solution with mass fraction of 3.5%
Fig. 8. EIS measurement results. (a) Nyquist plot; (b)(c) Bode plots; (d) equivalent circuit model
Fig. 9. Corrosion morphologies of specimens. (a) OM image of corrosion morphology; (b) SEM image of corrosion morphology of specimen #1; (c) SEM image of corrosion morphology of specimen #2; (d) SEM image of corrosion morphology of specimen #3
Element | Mg | Sc | Zr | Mn | Fe | Al |
---|
Mass fraction /% | 4.84 | 0.82 | 0.28 | 0.57 | 0.06 | Bal. |
|
Table 1. Chemical compositions of AlMgScZr alloy
Process parameter | Value |
---|
Laser power /W | 375 | Scanning speed /(mm/s) | 800,1000,1200,1400,1600 | Hatch spacing /μm | 120 | Layer thickness /μm | 30 |
|
Table 2. Process parameters for SLM forming
Specimen | icorr /(μA·cm-2) | βa | -βc | Epit /V | Rp /(Ω·cm2) |
---|
Specimen #1 | 31.29 | 393.06 | 148.40 | -0.671 | 1528.25 | Specimen #2 | 14.48 | 890.39 | 151.00 | -0.645 | 4165.80 | Specimen #3 | 23.91 | 482.71 | 123.11 | -0.661 | 1795.75 |
|
Table 3. Fitting results corresponding to Fig. 7
Specimen | Rs /(Ω·cm2) | Rf /(kΩ·cm2) | CPE1 / (10-6 F·cm-2) | n1 | Rct / (kΩ·cm2) | CPE2 / (10-4 F·cm-2) | n2 | χ2 /10-3 |
---|
Specimen #1 | 11.33 | 28.32 | 9.58 | 0.88 | 43.78 | 4.27 | 0.84 | 2.61 | Specimen #2 | 10.34 | 82.20 | 6.80 | 0.89 | 237.24 | 8.78 | 0.75 | 1.46 | Specimen #3 | 9.55 | 43.92 | 7.70 | 0.92 | 59.61 | 2.53 | 0.84 | 1.22 |
|
Table 4. Fitting results corresponding to Fig. 8