• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 47, Issue 3, 304005 (2020)
Wang Xia1, Xu Can2、*, Zhang Feng1, and Li Peng1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Graduate Management, Space Engineering University, Beijing 101416, China
  • 2Department of Space Command, Space Engineering University, Beijing 101416, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL202047.0304005 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Wang Xia, Xu Can, Zhang Feng, Li Peng. Anomaly Detection Method for Working Status of Low-Orbit Space Objects Based on Photometric Data[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2020, 47(3): 304005 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of observation geometry
    Fig. 1. Schematic of observation geometry
    Low-orbit objects observation. (a) Track of subsatellite point; (b) observation geometry of different windows varies with time
    Fig. 2. Low-orbit objects observation. (a) Track of subsatellite point; (b) observation geometry of different windows varies with time
    OCS curves of space objects at different observation geometry. (a) Three-axis stabilization; (b) spinning
    Fig. 3. OCS curves of space objects at different observation geometry. (a) Three-axis stabilization; (b) spinning
    Schematic of the forward direction of nodes in a warping path
    Fig. 4. Schematic of the forward direction of nodes in a warping path
    Schematic of space object with normal working status
    Fig. 5. Schematic of space object with normal working status
    Schematic of space object with abnormal working status. (a) Offset of 30°; (b) offset of 90°; (c) offset of 130°; (d) spinning about body Z; (e) sun alignment with nadir constraint
    Fig. 6. Schematic of space object with abnormal working status. (a) Offset of 30°; (b) offset of 90°; (c) offset of 130°; (d) spinning about body Z; (e) sun alignment with nadir constraint
    Three space object models. (a) Fengyun; (b) GPS; (c) Tiangong
    Fig. 7. Three space object models. (a) Fengyun; (b) GPS; (c) Tiangong
    DTW distance between phase angle curves of similar access
    Fig. 8. DTW distance between phase angle curves of similar access
    Typical examples of phase angle variation in similar access
    Fig. 9. Typical examples of phase angle variation in similar access
    DTW distance between OCS curves of similar access
    Fig. 10. DTW distance between OCS curves of similar access
    Typical OCS variation of similar access
    Fig. 11. Typical OCS variation of similar access
    Abnormal working status detection of Fengyun. (a) Abnormal pointing; (b) abnormal rotation
    Fig. 12. Abnormal working status detection of Fengyun. (a) Abnormal pointing; (b) abnormal rotation
    Abnormal working status detection of GPS. (a) Abnormal pointing; (b) abnormal rotation
    Fig. 13. Abnormal working status detection of GPS. (a) Abnormal pointing; (b) abnormal rotation
    Abnormal working status detection of Tiangong. (a) Abnormal pointing; (b) abnormal rotation
    Fig. 14. Abnormal working status detection of Tiangong. (a) Abnormal pointing; (b) abnormal rotation
    Materialρdρsαδab
    Kapton0.0122287.74034119.5696min{π/2,δ}1.32720.0933
    GaSa0.042823.00672122.5000min{π/2,δ}2.11244.8569
    Table 1. Improved Phong model parameters of some satellite surface materials
    Working stateAnomaly recognition rate /%
    FengyunGPSTiangongAverage 1Average 2
    Type 192.4372.9780.0081.80
    Type 277.8370.2788.1178.74
    Type 382.7078.9290.8184.1484.68(type 1 to type 4)
    Type 488.6510093.5194.05
    Type 598.3891.3599.4696.40
    Type 698.9296.2299.4698.2097.96(type 5 to type 7)
    Type 710097.8410099.28
    Average91.2786.8093.0590.37
    Table 2. Anomaly recognition rate corresponding of each working state
    Wang Xia, Xu Can, Zhang Feng, Li Peng. Anomaly Detection Method for Working Status of Low-Orbit Space Objects Based on Photometric Data[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2020, 47(3): 304005
    Download Citation