• Journal of Natural Resources
  • Vol. 35, Issue 2, 297 (2020)
Yue PAN1, Gang-min WENG1、2、*, Cong-hui LI1, and Na SONG1
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Economics and Management, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, China
  • 2Yanshan University Research Center of Regional Economic Development, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200205 Cite this Article
    Yue PAN, Gang-min WENG, Cong-hui LI, Na SONG. Evaluation on location advantages of 5A-Grade attractions in Silk Road Travel Belt based on the D-S evidence theory[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(2): 297 Copy Citation Text show less
    Multidimensional spatial characteristics of tourism attraction location
    Fig. 1. Multidimensional spatial characteristics of tourism attraction location
    Gravity center and standard deviational ellipse on scenic location advantage and tourist development
    Fig. 2. Gravity center and standard deviational ellipse on scenic location advantage and tourist development
    评价指标表征变量评价指标表征变量
    B1旅游生态环境B11植被覆盖率B4旅游相关机构B41每万人星级饭店数
    B12空气质量达标率B42每万人住宿和餐饮业法人单位数
    B13III类以上水质占比B43每万人文化、体育和娱乐业法人单位数
    B2旅游服务人员B21旅游从业人员密度B5旅游安全保障B51单位面积汽车租赁公司数
    B22普通高等学校在校学生数B52单位面积汽车修理厂数
    B3旅游基础设施B31人均道路面积B53单位面积加油、加气站数
    B32每万人拥有公共厕所B54单位面积医院、卫生院数
    B33每万人拥有公共交通车辆B55单位面积派出所数
    Table 1. Representation variable of tourism service location
    省(区)景区θj1θj2等级判定省(区)景区θj1θj2等级判定
    新疆天山大峡谷景区0.47060.2881II青海塔尔寺景区0.421720.3648I
    天山天池景区0.67930.3173V互助土族故土园景区0.43680.3771IV
    布鲁克景区0.34840.3284IV→V青海湖景区0.71210.1426V
    博斯腾湖景区0.39390.3064II
    白沙湖景区0.74140.1210IV甘肃鸣沙山—月牙泉景区0.42570.3136IV
    可可托海景区0.70720.1186IV天水麦积山景区0.44130.4067I→IV
    喀纳斯景区0.71990.1299IV崆峒山景区0.55360.3158I
    喀拉峻景区0.71550.2009IV嘉峪关文物景区0.94330.0317V
    那拉提景区0.69230.1888IV陕西大雁塔—大唐芙蓉园0.53690.4296II
    喀什噶尔老城景区0.63140.1920IV华清池景区0.50780.4598II→I
    泽普金胡杨景区0.64050.1883V秦始皇兵马俑博物馆0.51020.4573II
    葡萄沟景区0.79310.1915V太白山景区0.62560.3391IV
    宁夏灵武水洞沟景区0.65330.3200III法门寺佛文化景区0.95470.0388IV
    镇北堡西部影视城0.75740.2267I金丝峡景区0.96870.0199II
    沙坡头景区0.55770.4123IV华山景区0.55140.2919IV
    沙湖景区0.45090.3562I黄帝陵景区0.47960.2934IV
    Table 2. Location advantage level of 5A-Grade attractions in Silk Road Travel Belt
    重心标准差椭圆
    经度/E纬度/NX标准距离/kmY标准距离/km旋转角度/(°)椭圆面积/万km2
    测评景区98°8'47''39°38'49''1429.48356.83119.34160.19
    区位优势100°42'38°47'53''1317.54318.13120.73131.63
    资源区位102°42'10''38°18'16''1186.90236.39123.5388.10
    市场区位107°48'59''35°9'28''655.52138.92122.0228.60
    交通区位99°34'54''39°7'16''1374.69322.86121.02134.39
    服务区位97°21'30''40°10'4''1232.92293.19122.28113.52
    Table 3. Model parameters of gravity center and standard deviation ellipse on location advantage of 5A-Grade attractions
    发展领先发展滞后
    优势区秦始皇兵马俑博物馆、大雁塔—大唐芙蓉园、华清池、塔尔寺景区、天水麦积山景区、石嘴山沙湖景区(A类)博斯腾湖景区、镇北堡西部影视城、崆峒山景区、天山大峡谷景区(B类)
    非优区华山景区、青海湖、嘉峪关文物景区、喀纳斯景区、鸣沙山—月牙泉、法门寺佛文化景区、太白山、沙坡头景区、黄帝陵景区、天山天池景区(C类)巴音布鲁克景区、那拉提景区、金丝峡、吐鲁番葡萄沟、可可托海、互助土族故土园、白沙湖景区、喀拉峻景区、喀什葛尔老城、泽普金胡杨景区(D类)
    Table 4. Spatial mismatch of scenic tourist development and location advantage
    Yue PAN, Gang-min WENG, Cong-hui LI, Na SONG. Evaluation on location advantages of 5A-Grade attractions in Silk Road Travel Belt based on the D-S evidence theory[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(2): 297
    Download Citation