Fig. 1. Static star spot model
Fig. 2. Static star spot model in guide star catalogue
Fig. 3. Flow diagram for dynamic star spot template generation
Fig. 4. Dynamic star spot generation process
Fig. 5. Star sensor experiment diagram
Fig. 6. Angle distance error curves of three star point extraction methods under three angular velocities
Fig. 7. Angle distance error curves of three star point extraction methods under three exposure time
FOV/(°) | Area array/(pix×pix) | Pixel size /μm | Focal length /mm |
---|
20 | 1 024×1 024 | 18 | 51.957 |
|
Table 1. Optical system parameters of the star sensor
Angular velocity /(°·s-1) | | Angle distance error /(") | | Extraction rate
| | Time / s |
---|
| Mean | 3sigma | | Mean | Maximum | Minimum | |
---|
1 | | 8.21 | 3.46 | | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | | 4.16 | 2 | | 11.69 | 5.34 | | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.93 | | 4.65 | 3 | | 22.35 | 13.18 | | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.91 | | 4.87 |
|
Table 2. Experimental results of cross correlation template matching method using simple template at three angular velocities
Angular velocity /(°·s-1) | | Angle distance error /(") | | Extraction rate
| | Time / s |
---|
| Mean | 3sigma | | Mean | Maximum | Minimum | |
---|
1 | | 8.05 | 2.50 | | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | | 1 896.64 | 2 | | 11.05 | 6.02 | | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.93 | | 2 260.05 | 3 | | 20.91 | 14.10 | | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.91 | | 2 387.73 |
|
Table 3. Experimental results of cross correlation template matching method using complex template at three angular velocities
Angular velocity /(°·s-1) | | Angle distance error /(") | | Extraction rate /% | | Time / s |
---|
| Mean | 3sigma | | Mean | Maximum | Minimum | |
---|
1 | | 10.72 | 5.34 | | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.97 | | 4.05 | 2 | | 16.01 | 9.06 | | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.82 | | 4.57 | 3 | | 33.48 | 20.66 | | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.73 | | 4.69 |
|
Table 4. Experimental results of traditional method at three angular velocities
Exposure time / ms | | Angle distance error /(") | | Extraction rate | | Time / s |
---|
| Mean | 3sigma | | Mean | Maximum | Minimum | |
---|
86 | | 22.05 | 13.22 | | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.94 | | 5.03 | 62.5 | | 13.17 | 8.86 | | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.93 | | 4.76 | 50 | | 10.14 | 4.48 | | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.91 | | 4.38 |
|
Table 5. Experimental results of cross correlation template matching method using simple template at three exposure time
Exposure time / ms | | Angle distance error /(") | | Extraction rate | | Time / s |
---|
| Mean | 3sigma | | Mean | Maximum | Minimum | |
---|
86 | | 21.49 | 12.77 | | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.94 | | 2 368.98 | 62.5 | | 13.47 | 9.13 | | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.93 | | 2 056.19 | 50 | | 10.60 | 5.20 | | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.91 | | 1 934.20 |
|
Table 6. Experimental results of cross correlation template matching method using complex template at three exposure time
Exposure time / ms | | Angle distance error /(") | | Extraction rate | | Time / s |
---|
| Mean | 3sigma | | Mean | Maximum | Minimum | |
---|
86 | | 33.93 | 20.76 | | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.59 | | 4.56 | 62.5 | | 20.56 | 13.50 | | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.65 | | 4.36 | 50 | | 18.09 | 14.63 | | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.59 | | 4.49 |
|
Table 7. Experimental results of traditional method at three exposure time