• Journal of Natural Resources
  • Vol. 35, Issue 6, 1288 (2020)
Chao-xuan XU1, Chun-xia LU2、3、*, and Shao-lin HUANG2
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Geography, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, Liaoning, China
  • 2Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
  • 3College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200603 Cite this Article
    Chao-xuan XU, Chun-xia LU, Shao-lin HUANG. Study on ecological vulnerability and its influencing factors in Zhangjiakou area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(6): 1288 Copy Citation Text show less
    Study area
    Fig. 1. Study area
    Classification map of ecological vulnerability in Zhangjiakou area
    Fig. 2. Classification map of ecological vulnerability in Zhangjiakou area
    Ecological vulnerability of Zhangjiakou
    Fig. 3. Ecological vulnerability of Zhangjiakou
    Interactive detector results
    Fig. 4. Interactive detector results
    目标层要素层指标层
    生态脆弱性生态敏感性高程
    坡度
    年均温
    年均降水量
    植被覆盖度
    干旱指数
    单位面积土壤水蚀量
    单位面积土壤风蚀量
    生态恢复力人均水资源量
    植被净初级生产力(NPP)
    单位面积生态用地占比
    生态压力度人口密度
    经济密度
    单位面积农用地占比
    Table 1. Evaluation index system of ecological vulnerability SRP model in Zhangjiakou area
    脆弱性等级生态脆弱性指数标准化值脆弱程度生态特征
    0≤ S<0.2微度脆弱张家口地区生态系统结构功能完善,对外抗干扰能力强,承受生态压力小,生态系统稳定,自我恢复能力强,生态脆弱性低
    0.2≤ S<0.4轻度脆弱张家口地区生态系统结构功能较为完整,对外抗干扰能力较强,承受生态压力较小,生态系统较稳定,自我恢复能力较强,生态脆弱性较低
    0.4≤ S<0.6中度脆弱张家口地区生态系统结构功能尚可维持,对外抗干扰能力较弱,承受生态压力接近生态阈值,生态系统较不稳定,自我恢复能力较弱,生态脆弱性较高
    0.6≤ S<0.8重度脆弱张家口地区生态系统结构功能出现缺陷,对外抗干扰能力弱,承受生态压力大,生态系统不稳定,受损后恢复难度大,生态脆弱性高
    0.8≤ S ≤1极度脆弱张家口地区生态系统结构功能严重退化,对外抗干扰能力极弱,承受生态压力极大,生态系统极不稳定,受损后恢复难度极大,甚至不可逆转,生态脆弱性极高
    Table 2. Classification standard of ecological vulnerability in Zhangjiakou area
    判断依据交互作用
    q(X1∩X2) < min[q(X1), q(X2)]非线性减弱
    min[q(X1), q(X2)] < q(X1∩X2)<max[q(X1∩X2)]单因子非线性减弱
    q(X1∩X2) > max[q(X1∩X2)]双因子增强
    q(X1∩X2) = q(X1)+q(X2)相互独立
    q(X1∩X2) > q(X1)+q(X2)非线性增强
    Table 3. Interaction type of interaction detector
    主成分2008年2012年2016年
    特征值λ贡献率/%累积贡献率/%特征值λ贡献率/%累积贡献率/%特征值λ贡献率/%累积贡献率/%
    P15.24937.49337.4934.59932.85232.8525.28937.78137.781
    P23.27423.38960.8823.43324.52057.3723.15822.55660.337
    P31.78912.78073.6622.04414.59871.9691.68612.04672.383
    P41.3459.60983.2711.45010.35782.3271.50110.72583.108
    P51.0737.66590.9350.8696.20788.5340.9706.92990.037
    P60.5914.21895.1530.5774.12392.6570.5063.61593.652
    P70.3442.45497.6070.4533.23395.8900.4313.08196.733
    P80.2041.45699.0630.3422.44698.3360.2331.66398.397
    P90.1000.71799.7800.1400.99999.3350.0980.70099.096
    P100.0140.10199.8810.0460.32899.6630.0550.39299.489
    P110.0100.06999.9500.0350.25199.9140.0360.25599.744
    P120.0050.03599.9850.0100.07199.9850.0210.15399.897
    P130.0020.01299.9970.0010.01099.9950.0140.10199.998
    P140.0000.003100.0000.0010.005100.0000.0000.002100.000
    Table 4. The analysis of the main components of the spatial main components in Zhangjiakou area
    区县生态脆弱度区县生态脆弱度
    2008年2012年2016年2008年2012年2016年
    尚义县中度脆弱中度脆弱中度脆弱张北县重度脆弱中度脆弱中度脆弱
    康保县重度脆弱中度脆弱中度脆弱沽源县中度脆弱中度脆弱轻度脆弱
    万全区中度脆弱轻度脆弱中度脆弱赤城县轻度脆弱中度脆弱微度脆弱
    下花园区中度脆弱轻度脆弱轻度脆弱崇礼区轻度脆弱中度脆弱轻度脆弱
    涿鹿县轻度脆弱轻度脆弱微度脆弱怀安县中度脆弱轻度脆弱轻度脆弱
    阳原县中度脆弱中度脆弱中度脆弱桥西区重度脆弱中度脆弱中度脆弱
    蔚县轻度脆弱轻度脆弱轻度脆弱桥东区中度脆弱中度脆弱中度脆弱
    怀来县轻度脆弱微度脆弱微度脆弱宣化区中度脆弱轻度脆弱轻度脆弱
    Table 5. Ecological vulnerability of Zhangjiakou county-level areas
    影响因子q影响因子q
    2008年2012年2016年2008年2012年2016年
    高程0.1580.2170.148单位面积土壤风蚀量0.1320.1960.098
    坡度0.8140.3210.625人均水资源量0.1160.4730.355
    年均温0.3670.5350.539植被净初级生产力0.3600.5070.502
    年均降水量0.4160.1500.784单位面积生态用地占比0.7680.2540.456
    干旱指数0.4710.3420.725人口密度0.0250.0510.056
    植被覆盖度0.5970.2870.637经济密度0.0230.0480.052
    单位面积土壤水蚀量0.1320.1960.098单位面积农用地占比0.7360.2340.432
    Table 6. Detection results of factors in Zhangjiakou area
    Chao-xuan XU, Chun-xia LU, Shao-lin HUANG. Study on ecological vulnerability and its influencing factors in Zhangjiakou area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(6): 1288
    Download Citation