Research on retrieval method of atmospheric ozone column concentration from ultraviolet channel sunlight meter

QIAN Congcong; XUN Lina; LU Hui; LYU Dingyong; ZHANG Jingjing; LI Xin

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-6141.2025.01.005

Journals >Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics >Volume 20 >Issue 1 >Page 60 > Article

Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics
Vol. 20, Issue 1, 60 (2025)

Research on retrieval method of atmospheric ozone column concentration from ultraviolet channel sunlight meter

QIAN Congcong^1,*, XUN Lina^1,2, LU Hui¹, LYU Dingyong¹..., ZHANG Jingjing^1,2 and LI Xin³|Show fewer author(s)

Author Affiliations

¹School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China

²School of Artificial Intelligence, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China

³Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, HFIPS, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China

show less

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6141.2025.01.005 Cite this Article

Congcong QIAN, Lina XUN, Hui LU, Dingyong LYU, Jingjing ZHANG, Xin LI. Research on retrieval method of atmospheric ozone column concentration from ultraviolet channel sunlight meter[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 2025, 20(1): 60 Copy Citation Text

show less

差值类型	波长对/nm
差值类型	Dobson	Brewer	UV-PFR
单差对	305/317	310/313	305/311
	305/325	316/320	318/332
	305/340	310/316	305/318
	317/325	310/320	305/332
	317/340	313/316	311/318
	325/340	313/320	311/332
双差对	305/317, 317/340	310/313, 313/320	305/311, 311/318
双差对	317/340, 325/340	313/320, 316/320	311/332, 318/332

Table 1. Dobson、Brewer and UV-PFR instrument band

View in the Article

单差对/nm	$Ω_{A} - Ω_{B}$
单差对/nm	绝对平均值/DU	绝对偏差/DU	相对平均值/DU	相对偏差/%
305/317	-17.7	59.6	-5.7	19
305/325	-5.2	13.3	-1.6	4.3
305/340	-2.9	4.6	-0.9	1.5
317/325	-0.6	5.6	-0.1	1.8
317/340	-1.0	4.0	-0.3	1.3
325/340	-1.3	3.1	-0.4	1.0

Table 2. Comparison of results between Dobson single difference method and Pandora

View in the Article

双差对/nm	$Ω_{A} - Ω_{B}$
双差对/nm	绝对平均值/DU	绝对偏差/DU	相对平均值/DU	相对偏差/%
305/317, 317/340	-1.3	5.6	-0.4	1.9
317/340, 325/340	-4.5	14.6	-1.4	4.7

Table 3. Comparison of results of Dobson double difference method and Pandora

View in the Article

单差对/nm	$Ω_{A} - Ω_{B}$
单差对/nm	绝对平均值/DU	绝对偏差/DU	相对平均值/DU	相对偏差/%
310/313	-7.4	25.0	-2.3	8.0
316/320	-2.1	6.9	-0.7	2.2
310/316	-3.2	9.7	-1.0	3.1
310/320	-2.7	7.1	-0.9	2.3
313/316	-2.8	15.2	0.2	4.9
313/320	-1.0	5.1	-0.3	1.6

Table 4. Comparison of the results of Brewer single difference method and Pandora

View in the Article

双差对/nm	$Ω_{A} - Ω_{B}$
双差对/nm	绝对平均值/DU	绝对偏差/DU	相对平均值/DU	相对偏差/%
310/313, 313/320	-1.3	3.7	-0.4	1.2
313/320, 316/320	-1.5	4.9	-0.5	1.6

Table 5. Comparison of the results of Brewer double difference method and Pandora

View in the Article

单差对/nm	$Ω_{A} - Ω_{B}$
单差对/nm	绝对平均值/DU	绝对偏差/DU	相对平均值/DU	相对偏差/%
305/311	-5.8	18.9	-1.8	6.1
318/332	-1.3	2.8	-0.4	0.1
305/318	-5.6	13.8	-1.8	4.4
305/332	-3.1	5.0	-0.9	1.6
311/318	-5.5	14.5	-1.7	4.6
311/332	-2.8	4.6	-0.8	1.5

Table 6. Comparison of results between UV-PFR single difference method and Pandora instrument

View in the Article

双差对/nm	$Ω_{A} - Ω_{B}$
双差对/nm	绝对平均值/DU	绝对偏差/DU	相对平均值/DU	相对偏差/%
305/311, 311/318	0.7	7.2	0.2	2.4
311/332, 318/332	-1.1	1.8	-0.3	0.5

Table 7. Comparison of results between UV-PFR double difference method and Pandora instrument

View in the Article

单差对/nm	$Ω_{A} - Ω_{B}$
单差对/nm	绝对平均值/DU	绝对偏差/DU	相对平均值/DU	相对偏差/%
325/340	-1.3	3.1	-0.4	1.0
313/320	-1.0	5.1	-0.3	1.6
318/332	-1.3	2.8	-0.4	0.1

Table 8. Comparison of the best channels of the three single-difference pairs

View in the Article

双差对/nm	$Ω_{A} - Ω_{B}$
双差对/nm	绝对平均值/DU	绝对偏差/DU	相对平均值/DU	相对偏差/%
305/317, 317/340	-1.3	5.6	-0.4	1.9
310/313, 313/320	-1.3	3.7	-0.4	1.2
311/332, 318/332	-1.1	1.8	-0.3	0.5

Table 9. Comparison of the best channels of the three single-difference pairs

View in the Article

实验数量	$Ω_{B}$ /DU	$Ω_{A} - Ω_{B}$
实验数量	$Ω_{B}$ /DU	绝对平均值/DU	绝对偏差/DU	相对平均值/DU	相对偏差/%
679	296	-0.48	3.36	-0.2	1.0
679	296	-0.84	2.72	-0.3	0.9
276	336	-0.27	2.76	-0.08	0.8
276	336	-0.22	3.88	-0.06	1.0
299	331	-1.29	3.29	-0.4	0.9
299	331	-1.19	2.27	-0.3	0.7
597	314	-0.2	2.48	-0.6	0.8
597	314	-0.4	4.91	-0.1	1.0
312	366	-0.59	2.18	-0.2	0.6
312	366	-0.75	1.75	-0.2	0.5

Table 10. Five groups of experimental results in different time periods

Download Citation

Save the article for my favorites

Paper Information

微信扫一扫：分享

微信扫一扫：分享