Yanwen Xia, Yue Liang, Sen Li, Junpu Zhao, Zhitao Peng, Hongguang Li, Hua Liu, Zhihong Sun, Kuixing Zheng, Xiaofeng Wei. Energy measurement system of a large-aperture high power laser experiment platform[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2013, 1(3-4): 3-43-4000126
Journals >High Power Laser Science and Engineering >Volume 1 >Issue 3-4 >Page 3-43-4000126 > Article
- High Power Laser Science and Engineering
- Vol. 1, Issue 3-4, 3-43-4000126 (2013)
Fig. 1. Schematic view of the energy diagnostic system of the large-aperture High Power
Laser Experiment Platform.
Fig. 2. After-crystal energy relationship diagram.
Fig. 3. Comparison of the energy balancing relationship between the two approaches.
(a) the relationship curve between $\Sigma =h_{1}W_{1}+h_{2}W_{2}+h_{3}W_{3}$ and energy reading from three-wavelength calorimeter
reading $W_{4}$ and (b) their corresponding relative errors.
Fig. 4. Comparison between the energy balancing relationships from two approaches. (a)
The relationship curve between $A={K}'_{1} W_{1}+{K}'_{2} W_{2}+{K}'_{3}W_{3}$ and energy reading from the 420 calorimeter, $E_{420}$ , in back of the third-harmonics sampling mirror 1
and (b) their corresponding relative errors.
Fig. 5. The relationship curve (a) between the total output energy from calibration and
that derived from the main amplifier, and (b) their corresponding relative
errors.
Fig. 6. Under different harmonics conversion efficiencies, the relationship curve
between (a) the main amplifier energy and the total output energy from the
crystal, and (b) their corresponding relative errors.
|
Table 1. Energy balancing coefficients from two approaches.
|
Table 2. The energy sampling coefficients from two approaches.
Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address
© Copyright 2018-2021 | Chinese Laser Press. All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备15018463号-20