• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 50, Issue 16, 1602401 (2023)
Lei Yang1, Xinyu Xu1, Jianlei Wang3, Yunxia Ye1、2、*, Xudong Ren1, and Weibiao Chen3
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, China
  • 2Institute of Micro-nano Optoelectronics and Terahertz Technology,Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, China
  • 3Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shanghai 201800, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL221543 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Lei Yang, Xinyu Xu, Jianlei Wang, Yunxia Ye, Xudong Ren, Weibiao Chen. High‑Uniformity Ultra‑Fast Laser Beam Splitting and Precision Machining Based on Hybrid Algorithm[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2023, 50(16): 1602401 Copy Citation Text show less
    Picosecond laser parallel processing system based on spatial light modulator
    Fig. 1. Picosecond laser parallel processing system based on spatial light modulator
    Flowchart of GS algorithm
    Fig. 2. Flowchart of GS algorithm
    Flowchart of GS-GA algorithm
    Fig. 3. Flowchart of GS-GA algorithm
    Flowchart of feedback GS-GA algorithm
    Fig. 4. Flowchart of feedback GS-GA algorithm
    Influence of zero-order beam and its elimination method. (a) Effect of zero-order beam on multi-beam splitting; (b) effect of zero-order beam on processing; (c) zero-order beam elimination method
    Fig. 5. Influence of zero-order beam and its elimination method. (a) Effect of zero-order beam on multi-beam splitting; (b) effect of zero-order beam on processing; (c) zero-order beam elimination method
    Beam splitting effects of three algorithms captured by camera. (a1)(a2)(a3) GS algorithm; (b1)(b2)(b3) GS-GA algorithm;(c1)(c2)(c3) feedback GS-GA algorithm
    Fig. 6. Beam splitting effects of three algorithms captured by camera. (a1)(a2)(a3) GS algorithm; (b1)(b2)(b3) GS-GA algorithm;(c1)(c2)(c3) feedback GS-GA algorithm
    Beam splitting processing effects of three different algorithms. (a1)(a2)(a3) GS algorithm; (b1)(b2)(b3) GS-GA algorithm;(c1)(c2)(c3) feedback GS-GA algorithm
    Fig. 7. Beam splitting processing effects of three different algorithms. (a1)(a2)(a3) GS algorithm; (b1)(b2)(b3) GS-GA algorithm;(c1)(c2)(c3) feedback GS-GA algorithm
    Ways to selecting holes. (a) Serial numbers of holes under cross arrangement; (b) serial numbers of holes under annular arrangement; (c) serial numbers of holes under 8×8 array arrangement
    Fig. 8. Ways to selecting holes. (a) Serial numbers of holes under cross arrangement; (b) serial numbers of holes under annular arrangement; (c) serial numbers of holes under 8×8 array arrangement
    Machining hole diameters and depths obtained by three algorithms. (a) Machining hole diameter under cross arrangement; (b) machining hole depth under cross arrangement.(c) machining hole diameter under annular arrangement; (d) machining hole depth under annular arrangement; (e) machining hole diameter under 8×8 array arrangement; (f) machining hole depth under 8×8 array arrangement
    Fig. 9. Machining hole diameters and depths obtained by three algorithms. (a) Machining hole diameter under cross arrangement; (b) machining hole depth under cross arrangement.(c) machining hole diameter under annular arrangement; (d) machining hole depth under annular arrangement; (e) machining hole diameter under 8×8 array arrangement; (f) machining hole depth under 8×8 array arrangement
    Processing effects of 10×10 beam array generated by feedback GS-GA algorithm on aluminum sample. (a) Full view of aluminum sample after processing; (b) 3D morphology of hole array; (c) depth of first row of holes; (d) depth of fifth row of holes; (e) depth of sixth row of holes; (f) depth of tenth row of holes
    Fig. 10. Processing effects of 10×10 beam array generated by feedback GS-GA algorithm on aluminum sample. (a) Full view of aluminum sample after processing; (b) 3D morphology of hole array; (c) depth of first row of holes; (d) depth of fifth row of holes; (e) depth of sixth row of holes; (f) depth of tenth row of holes
    ParameterSpot diameterWavelengthPulse durationFrequency

    Linear

    polarization degree

    Beam

    quality

    Beam mode
    Content3 mm1064 nm15 ps500 kHz100∶1M2<1.3TEM00
    Table 1. Main parameters of picosecond laser
    ParameterResolution

    Pixel

    pitch

    Effective

    area

    Fill factorInput signal levelRecommended average powerRefresh rate
    Value1272 pixel×1024 pixel12.5 μm15.9 mm×12.8 mm96%256≤100 W60 Hz
    Table 2. Main parameters of spatial light modulators

    Beam

    arrangement

    GS algorithmGS-GA algorithmFeedback GS-GA algorithm
    Runtime

    Number of

    iterations

    RuntimeNumber of population updatesRuntimeNumber of population updates
    Cross<1 min453.5 h226 h28
    Circle<1 min503 h195 h25
    8×8 array<1 min436.5 h4014.5 h57
    Table 3. Running time of GS algorithm, GS-GA algorithm and feedback GS-GA algorithm

    Beam

    arrangement

    Uniformity of

    GS algorithm /%

    Uniformity of

    GS-GA algorithm /%

    Uniformity of feedback GS-GA algorithm /%
    Cross64.382.393.8

    Circle

    8×8 array

    75.8

    59.4

    84.2

    68.3

    95.1

    94.5

    Table 4. Energy uniformity of split beams generated by GS algorithm, GS-GA algorithm, and feedback GS-GA algorithm under different arrangements

    Beam

    arrangement

    Hole diameter uniformityI1I2
    GS algorithmGS-GA algorithmFeedback GS-GA algorithm
    Cross65.3%80.6%92.5%14.8%41.7%
    Annular70.8%83.1%93.7%12.8%32.3%
    8×8 array52.9%67.1%94.3%40.5%72.9%
    Table 5. Machining hole diameter uniformity obtained through GS algorithm, GS-GA algorithm, and feedback GS-GA algorithm under different arrangements

    Beam

    arrangement

    Hole depth uniformityI3I4
    GS algorithmGS-GA algorithmFeedback GS-GA algorithm
    Cross60.2%74.3%85.1%14.5%40.1%
    Annular63.0%77.2%86.7%12.3%37.6%
    8×8 array59.4%74.7%85.1%13.9%43.3%
    Table 6. Machining hole depth uniformity obtained through GS algorithm, GS-GA algorithm, and feedback GS-GA algorithm under different arrangements
    Lei Yang, Xinyu Xu, Jianlei Wang, Yunxia Ye, Xudong Ren, Weibiao Chen. High‑Uniformity Ultra‑Fast Laser Beam Splitting and Precision Machining Based on Hybrid Algorithm[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2023, 50(16): 1602401
    Download Citation