Fig. 1. Schematic of microhardness test points
Fig. 2. Schematic of three-point bending experiment
Fig. 3. Microstructures of A356 aluminum alloy after laser remelting treatment at different power. (a) 1000 W; (b) 1500 W; (c) 2000 W
Fig. 4. Microstructures of remelting layer obtained at different laser power. (a) 1000 W; (b) 1500 W; (c) 2000 W
Fig. 5. EDS spectra of substrate area. (a) EDS test points distribution map; (b) EDS spectrum of Spot 1point; (c) EDS spectrum of Spot 2 point; (d) EDS spectrum of Spot 3 point
Fig. 6. XRD patterns of remelting layer obtained at laser power of 2000 W
Fig. 7. SEM images of each region in remelting layer obtained at laser power of 2000 W. (a) Remelting zone, ×1000; (b) heat affected zone, ×1000; (c) substrate zone, ×1000; (d) remelting zone, ×3000; (e) heat affected zone,×3000; (f) substrate zone, ×3000
Fig. 8. Microhardness diagrams. (a) Microhardness histogram; (b) microhardness of remelting layer obtained at laser power of 2000 W; (c) microhardness of remelting layer obtained at laser power of 1500 W; (d) microhardness of remelting layer obtained at laser power of 1000 W
Fig. 9. Bending test results. (a) Bending test results of substrate sample and remelting samples obtained at different laser power; (b) partial view of Fcr for A356 base metal; (c) partial view of Fcr for remelting sample obtained at laser power of 1000 W; (c) partial view of Fcr for remelting sample obtained at laser power of 1500 W; (d) partial view of Fcr for remelting sample obtained at laser power of 2000 W
Fig. 10. Metallographic images of bending cracks in different samples. (a) A356 aluminum alloy base material; (b) remelting sample obtained at laser power of 1000 W; (c) remelting sample obtained at laser power of 1500 W; (d) remelting sample obtained at laser power of 2000 W
Element | Al | Cu | Si | Mg | Zn | Fe | Mu | Ti |
---|
Mass fraction /% | Bal. | ≤0.20 | 6.5--7.5 | 0.25--0.45 | ≤0.1 | ≤0.20 | ≤0.1 | ≤0.20 |
|
Table 1. Chemical composition of A356 aluminum alloy
No. | Element | Mass fraction /% | Atomic fraction /% | Net intensity | Error /% |
---|
| Mg | 1.53 | 1.70 | 383.30 | 3.87 | Spot 1 in Fig.5 | Al | 96.30 | 96.45 | 23347.11 | 1.44 | | Si | 1.58 | 1.52 | 131.67 | 10.40 | | Ti | 0.59 | 0.33 | 56.33 | 14.35 | | Al | 30.00 | 30.94 | 8340.58 | 1.79 | Spot 2 in Fig.5 | Si | 69.40 | 68.76 | 13226.19 | 4.43 | | Fe | 0.61 | 0.30 | 40.58 | 18.22 | Spot 3 in Fig.5 | Al | 84.62 | 85.14 | 22045.66 | 1.20 | | Si | 15.38 | 14.86 | 1505.87 | 7.76 |
|
Table 2. ESD results of substrate area
Power /W | Size in remeltingzone /μm | Size in heataffected zone /μm |
---|
α-Al | Al-Si | α-Al | Al-Si |
---|
2000 | 14.3 | 4.5 | 19 | 6.2 | 1500 | 9.3 | 3.3 | 16.3 | 4.2 | 1000 | 6.5 | 2 | 14.6 | 3 |
|
Table 3. Size of each phase in remelting layer obtained at different laser power