• High Power Laser and Particle Beams
  • Vol. 33, Issue 12, 123021 (2021)
Hongwei Sun1, Jianhong Hao1, Qiang Zhao2、*, Jieqing Fan1, Fang Zhang2, and Zhiwei Dong2
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
  • 2Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100094, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.11884/HPLPB202133.210240 Cite this Article
    Hongwei Sun, Jianhong Hao, Qiang Zhao, Jieqing Fan, Fang Zhang, Zhiwei Dong. Effect of antireflection film on performance of monocrystalline silicon solar cell[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33(12): 123021 Copy Citation Text show less
    Structure diagram of monocrystalline silicon solar cell
    Fig. 1. Structure diagram of monocrystalline silicon solar cell
    Effect of doping concentration on cell efficiency
    Fig. 2. Effect of doping concentration on cell efficiency
    Battery characteristic curve before and after optimization
    Fig. 3. Battery characteristic curve before and after optimization
    I-U characteristic curve of different antireflection films
    Fig. 4. I-U characteristic curve of different antireflection films
    Relationship between antireflection film thickness and cell efficiency
    Fig. 5. Relationship between antireflection film thickness and cell efficiency
    Quantum efficiency of batteries with different antireflection membranes
    Fig. 6. Quantum efficiency of batteries with different antireflection membranes
    Comparison of battery performance with and without pyramid structure
    Fig. 7. Comparison of battery performance with and without pyramid structure
    parameterbattery area/cm2battery thickness/μm base doping concentration/cm−3emitter doping concentration/cm−3diffusion length/μm
    before optimization10×103005×10161×1019130.5
    after optimization10×103001×10171×1018200.3
    Table 1. Simulation without antireflection film
    Isc/A Uoc/V Pm/W FFη/%
    Ref. [4] modeling results 2.280.561.210.83512.10
    modeling results before optimization2.2750.63671.2110.83612.11
    modeling results after optimization2.420.67441.3750.84213.75
    Table 2. The modeling results in this paper are compared with those in Ref. [4]
    antireflection film materialrefractive index
    SiNx2.2
    SiNx:H 2
    SiO21.52
    Ta2O52.1~2.26
    TiO22.39~2.47
    Table 3. Refractive index of antireflection film materials
    antireflection film materialUoc/V Isc/A Pm/W η/% FF
    SiNx0.683 5923.435 181.981 8419.820.843 960 498
    SiNx:H 0.683 8583.464 761.999 620.000.843 925 363
    SiO20.682 1753.277 721.887 4118.870.844 109 137
    Ta2O50.683 6363.440 051.984 7719.850.843 957 365
    TiO20.682 8553.353 341.932 7519.330.844 052 769
    Table 4. Parameters of solar cells with different antireflection coatings
    Hongwei Sun, Jianhong Hao, Qiang Zhao, Jieqing Fan, Fang Zhang, Zhiwei Dong. Effect of antireflection film on performance of monocrystalline silicon solar cell[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2021, 33(12): 123021
    Download Citation