


Abstract
1 Introduction
Free-electron lasers (FELs), which serve as tunable coherent sources of short-wavelength radiation, have attracted considerable attention owing to their widespread application in spectroscopy
[
GeV), high-peak current (
kA), and low-emittance (
) electron beams (
beams) using laser wakefield accelerators (LWFAs)
[
beams usually have a large energy spread of a few percent
[
beam
[
beam must be matched with the transverse gradient field of the TGU to satisfy the resonant condition
[
beam is introduced.
In this study, we investigate a simple scheme to improve the performance of the radiation using a PU together with a properly dispersed
beam from the LWFA. Our scheme has no need of extra field for correcting the orbit deflection induced by the field gradient and is easy to implement. In the proposed scheme, the energy of the
beam is dispersed with its horizontal position so that only the center electrons satisfy the resonant condition, but the frequency detuning increases when the electrons deviate from the beam center, which inhibits the radiation growth. This mechanism can be regarded as a selection process, in which the PU acts as a filter for selecting the electrons near the beam center to achieve the radiation. Although only the center electrons contribute, the radiation can be enhanced owing to the high-peak current of the
beam. Theoretical analysis and numerical simulations demonstrate the feasibility of a self-amplified spontaneous emission (SASE) FEL with sub-gigawatt power, a narrow bandwidth (
) and good transverse coherence in the proposed scheme with typical parameters of the
beam from the LWFA.
2 Dispersion effects on FEL radiation
Assuming a highly relativistic
beam with normalized energy
propagating through an undulator with the period
and strength parameter
, the on-axis radiation wavelength is
. To obtain a high-gain FEL, the beam energy spread
should satisfy
[
Considering an
beam with horizontal dispersion
, the horizontal position of the electrons depends on the energy:
, as shown in Figure
beams without and with the dispersion are shown in Figures
Once the horizontal dispersion is introduced, the horizontal size of the
beam increases to
, and the density of the
beam decreases. Using the method of perturbation analysis and integration along the unperturbed trajectories
[
We attempt to perform the EUV FEL operation by employing the attainable LWFA beam parameters from Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics (SIOM)
[
beam at the entrance of the undulator are shown in Table
without external focusing, it is reasonable to assume a beta function of
. Thus, the initial transverse beam size is estimated as
. The horizontal dispersion is chosen as
cm, which is the optimum dispersion of the beam according to the simulation results presented in the next section. Here, only the linear dispersion is considered in our simulation. It is noted that the beta function is the one before introducing the dispersion
[
.
Parameter | EUV | X-ray |
---|---|---|
Beam energy
![]() | 380 MeV | 1 GeV |
Energy spread
![]() | 1% | 1% |
Normalized emittance
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Charge
![]() | 80 pC | 80 pC |
RMS bunch length
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Horizontal dispersion
![]() | 2.5 cm | 2 cm |
Undulator parameter
![]() | 1.15 | 2 |
Undulator period
![]() | 2 cm | 1 cm |
Undulator length
![]() | 6 m | 6 m |
Resonant wavelength
![]() | 30 nm | 3.9 nm |
Table 1.
beam and undulator parameters used in our study for EUV and soft X-ray FELs.
The FEL radiation was simulated in the time-dependent mode of GENESIS, which includes three-dimensional (3D) effects, such as the diffraction and transverse modes
[
beams with (blue) and without (black) the horizontal dispersion. For a 6 m undulator, the radiation power increases by almost three orders of magnitude when the horizontal dispersion of the
beam is introduced. Figure
beam. Figures
-beam dispersion, the divergence angle is large owing to the large emittance of the
beam and the relatively low gain, as shown in Figure
beam, as shown in Figure
We now consider an FEL operating at the ‘water window’ radiation wavelength. The parameters of the
beam and the undulator considered in Ref. [
cm. Reasonably assuming a beta function of
m, we obtain an initial beam size of
. After dispersion, the horizontal beam size increases to
. The radiation power is improved by two orders of magnitude and reaches saturation with a properly dispersed
beam, as shown in Figure
beam owing to the short duration of the beam, as shown in Figure
3 Analysis of radiation properties
According to the aforementioned discussion, the radiation properties can be significantly improved by utilizing a properly dispersed
beam in the PU scheme. Taking the 30 nm radiation as an example, we now study the properties of the radiation with different dispersions of the
beam. Figure
is satisfied in all of our simulation cases for the TGU scheme. The radiation power is significantly enhanced by introducing the
-beam dispersion. As discussed previously, Equation (
beam is introduced, the localized energy spread decreases, as does the effective FEL parameter. However, compared with the effective FEL parameter, the localized energy spread decreases rapidly as the dispersion increases, as indicated by Equations (
Figure
Because of the stronger diffraction and smaller spatial overlap with the
beam, the higher-order modes can be suppressed. Thus, the SASE FEL can reach almost full transverse coherence before saturation, and the radiation emittance is almost given by the diffraction-limited radiation emittance
, where
is the resonant wavelength of the radiation. However, the large transverse beam size due to the dispersion provides enough transverse space for the high-order modes to couple with the
beam, reducing the transverse coherence. The transverse mode parameter can be defined as
[
4 Physical mechanism of proposed scheme
Consider an
beam having a horizontal dispersion, whose phase-space distribution is schematically illustrated in Figure
We now give a theoretical description of the radiation with a dispersed
beam and compare between the PU and TGU schemes. A 3D theoretical model based on the analysis of the eigenmode was established in Ref. [
and the complex growth rate
, has a solution of the form
. The growth rate with a negative imaginary part represents the growth mode. An analytical solution is obtained for the case where the transverse emittance and focusing are negligible (which is suitable for
beams from an LWFA owing to the small emittance), and the scaled growth rate
of a growing mode is obtained using the relation
[
The above theoretical analysis is based on the TGU scheme and cannot be directly applied to the PU scheme. From a local viewpoint, the wavelength of a photon emitted by an electron is determined by the energy of the electron, which follows the relation
. We make the simple assumption that
, which means that all the electrons satisfy the resonant condition under the large-dispersion approximation in both the PU and TGU schemes. However, the radiation wavelength shifts in the PU scheme when the energy of the electron deviates from
, which can be described by the frequency-detuning parameter
. The difference between the TGU and PU schemes is that the frequency detuning is independent upon the transverse position in the TGU when the matching condition is fulfilled (here, we set
under the large-dispersion approximation). In the PU scheme, the detuning increases when the electron deviates from the horizontal beam center. We define a detuning parameter in the PU scheme that depends on the horizontal position
:
The simulation results and theoretical analysis demonstrate that the significant fraction of the off-center electrons makes no contribution to the lasing in our proposed scheme. This mechanism is similar to the collimation of the energy tail. Next, we conduct simulations by adding a horizontal collimator with different widths of the slit at the entrance of the undulator to perform a comparison. The horizontal dispersion of the
beam is
cm. Figure
. However, when the halfwidth of the slit exceeds
, the radiation power changes little with the increase of the slit width in the PU scheme. For the cases with the collimator (the halfwidth of the slit is
) and without the collimator, the average radiation power is 84 and 90 MW, respectively, in the PU scheme. That is, approximately 37% of the electrons near the beam center contribute more than 90% of the total radiation power. Figures
5 Conclusions
Simulations demonstrate that the FEL performance can be significantly improved with a PU by introducing the horizontal dispersion of the
beam from the LWFA. Although only part of the electrons near the beam center contribute to the radiation, intense FEL radiation can be obtained owing to the high-peak current of the
beam. The radiation pulses can be sub-gigawatt level in power with a narrow bandwidth below 1% and good transverse coherence without seeding. The proposed scheme is easy to implement, which is significant for the experimental realization of the LWFA-based FEL. Further investigations on driving short-wavelength LWFA-based FELs are ongoing.
References
[4] D. H. Bilderback, P. Elleaume, E. Weckert. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 38, S773(2005).
[5] K. Tono. High Power Laser Sci. Eng., 5, e7(2017).
[10] T. Tajima, J. M. Dawson. Phys. Rev. Lett., 43, 267(1979).
[14] J. S. Liu, C. Q. Xia, W. T. Wang, H. Y. Lu, C. Wang, A. H. Deng, W. T. Li, H. Zhang, X. Y. Liang, Y. X. Leng, X. M. Lu, C. Wang, J. Z. Wang, K. Nakajima, R. X. Li, Z. Z. Xu. Phys. Rev. Lett., 107(2011).
[17] W. T. Wang, W. T. Li, J. S. Liu, Z. J. Zhang, R. Qi, C. H. Yu, J. Q. Liu, M. Fang, Z. Y. Qin, C. Wang, Y. Xu, F. X. Wu, Y. X. Leng, R. X. Li, Z. Z. Xu. Phys. Rev. Lett., 117(2016).
[21] Z. Huang, K.- J. Kim. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 10(2007).
[22] Z. J. Zhang, J. S. Liu, W. T. Wang, W. T. Li, C. H. Yu, Y. Tian, R. Qi, C. Wang, Z. Y. Qin, M. Fang, J. Q. Liu, K. Nakajima, R. X. Li, Z. Z. Xu. New J. Phys., 17(2015).
[23] T. I. Smith, J. M. J. Madey, L. R. Elias, D. A. G. Deacon. J. Appl. Phys., 50, 4580(1979).
[24] Z. Huang, Y. Ding, C. B. Schroeder. Phys. Rev. Lett., 109(2012).
[25] P. Baxevanis, Y. Ding, Z. Huang, R. Ruth. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 17(2014).
[26] Q. Jia, H. Li. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 20(2017).
[27] R. Bonifacio, C. Pellegrini, L. M. Narducci. Opt. Commun., 50, 373(1984).
[28] Z. Qin, C. Yu, W. Wang, J. Liu, W. Li, R. Qi, Z. Zhang, J. Liu, M. Fang, K. Feng, Y. Wu, L. Ke, Y. Chen, Y. Xu, Y. Leng, C. Wang, R. Li, Z. Xu. Phys. Plasmas, 25(2018).
[29] M. Fang, W. Wang, Z. Zhang, J. Liu, C. Yu, R. Qi, Z. Qin, J. Liu, K. Feng, Y. Wu, C. Wang, T. Liu, D. Wang, Y. Xu, F. Wu, Y. Leng, R. Li, Z. Xu. Chin. Opt. Lett., 16(2018).
[30] T. Liu, T. Zhang, D. Wang, Z. Huang. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 20(2017).
[31] S. Reiche. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res A, 429, 243(1999).
[32] I. A. Vartanyants, A. Singer. New J. Phys., 12(2010).
[33] P. Baxevanis, Z. Huang, R. Ruth, C. B. Schroeder. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams, 18(2015).
Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address