• Acta Photonica Sinica
  • Vol. 53, Issue 3, 0314002 (2024)
Xuezhu LIN1,2,*, Hai WANG1, Lili GUO1,2, Dongming YAN1..., Lijuan LI1,2, Yue LIU1 and Jing SUN1|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Optical Control and Optical Information Transmission Technology, Ministry of Education, School of Optoelectronic Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China
  • 2Zhongshan Institute of Changchun University of Science and Technology, Zhongshan 528437, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/gzxb20245303.0314002 Cite this Article
    Xuezhu LIN, Hai WANG, Lili GUO, Dongming YAN, Lijuan LI, Yue LIU, Jing SUN. Prediction Model of Laser 3D Projection Galvanometer Deflection Voltage Based on PROA-BP[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2024, 53(3): 0314002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Laser projection system internal geometric relationship structure diagram
    Fig. 1. Laser projection system internal geometric relationship structure diagram
    BP neural network structure and neuron structure
    Fig. 2. BP neural network structure and neuron structure
    Use PROA-BP neural network predictive galvanometer deflection voltage process
    Fig. 3. Use PROA-BP neural network predictive galvanometer deflection voltage process
    Projection coordinate system
    Fig. 4. Projection coordinate system
    Dataset acquisition
    Fig. 5. Dataset acquisition
    MSE and MAE under the number of different neurons
    Fig. 6. MSE and MAE under the number of different neurons
    MSE and MAE of different network structures under training dataset
    Fig. 7. MSE and MAE of different network structures under training dataset
    Prediction errors of different network structures
    Fig. 8. Prediction errors of different network structures
    k2 calibration
    Fig. 9. k2 calibration
    k1 calibration
    Fig. 10. k1 calibration
    Projection positioning error of laser 3D projection traditional model projection simulation
    Fig. 11. Projection positioning error of laser 3D projection traditional model projection simulation
    Projection positioning error of projection simulation based on galvanometer deflection voltage prediction model of laser 3D projection based on PROA-BP
    Fig. 12. Projection positioning error of projection simulation based on galvanometer deflection voltage prediction model of laser 3D projection based on PROA-BP
    Experimental verification platform
    Fig. 13. Experimental verification platform
    Measure the center coordinates of the intersection points of the cross lines
    Fig. 14. Measure the center coordinates of the intersection points of the cross lines
    Projection positioning error of projection experiment of galvanometer deflection voltage prediction model of laser 3D projection based on PROA-BP
    Fig. 15. Projection positioning error of projection experiment of galvanometer deflection voltage prediction model of laser 3D projection based on PROA-BP
    Pointuvk1=6,k2=6,e=6.8k1=5.999 99,k2=6.004 10,e=6.798 37Error
    VHxyVHxy
    1-5-4.5-30-27-591.814 0-577.350 2-29.995 0-27.081 0-592.243 1-577.233 90.431 6
    2-3.52-2112229.124 2-383.864 0-20.996 512.008 0229.275 8-383.793 90.167 0
    3-1.5-3-9-18331.179 3-158.384 0-8.998 5-18.012 0331.413 3-158.358 00.235 6
    40.5339327.575 152.407 72.999 518.012 0327.807 752.399 00.234 8
    5241224458.202 9212.556 611.998 024.016 0458.543 1212.520 10.346 4
    63-2.518-15-283.561 0324.919 717.997 0-15.010-283.753 0324.861 80.196 5
    741.5249174.450 4445.228 723.996 09.006 0174.562 9445.145 00.181 2
    Table 1. Laser 3D projection traditional model projection simulation part of the data
    PointuvxyuvxyError
    1-40.2528.842 12-445.228 6-3.999 660.249 8728.826 6-445.186 00.045 38
    22.753.75434.820 2296.213 42.750 723.748 70434.662 4296.295 50.177 82
    3-1.753332.662 6-185.339 0-1.748 092.998 76332.503 4-185.132 10.261 04
    41.252215.836 0131.652 51.249 801.999 69215.801 0131.631 10.041 01
    5-4.5-2.75-334.462 4-509.525 4-4.499 11-2.749 16-334.338 6-509.408 00.170 62
    61.75-0.25-26.809 9185.339 01.750 34-0.251 21-26.939 9185.375 80.135 11
    71-1-106.397 8105.104 21.000 48-1.000 14-106.413 4105.155 00.053 14
    Table 2. Projection simulation part of the data of galvanometer deflection voltage prediction model of laser 3D projection based on PROA-BP
    PointValue x/mmValue y/mmError/mmProjection positioning error
    TheoreticalActualTheoreticalActualxy
    1140.540 83140.703 41487.732 60487.691 750.162 58-0.040 850.167 63
    2-324.919 70-324.860 37-487.733 00-487.628 850.059 330.104 150.119 86
    3212.556 56212.714 70-577.350 00-577.497 640.158 14-0.147 640.216 35
    4674.508 52674.651 73404.026 20403.965 000.143 21-0.061 200.155 74
    5-445.228 69-445.230 9934.920 7735.004 08-0.002 300.083 310.083 34
    6531.709 43531.810 72-140.541 00-140.521 510.101 290.019 490.103 15
    7-105.104 24-104.978 5634.920 7734.800 980.125 68-0.119 790.173 62
    8-726.542 53-726.360 13-212.557 00-212.851 420.182 40-0.294 420.346 34
    9-105.104 24-105.152 03-781.286 00-780.965 99-0.047 790.320 010.323 56
    10-363.970 23-363.919 67105.104 20105.311 970.050 560.207 770.213 83
    11-445.228 69-445.236 88-69.926 80-70.004 77-0.008 19-0.077 970.078 40
    12-212.556 56-212.368 00-176.327 00-176.104 710.188 560.222 290.291 49
    13140.540 83140.620 26-105.104 00-105.224 840.079 43-0.120 840.144 61
    Table 3. Projection experiment part of the data of galvanometer deflection voltage prediction model of laser 3D projection based on PROA-BP
    Xuezhu LIN, Hai WANG, Lili GUO, Dongming YAN, Lijuan LI, Yue LIU, Jing SUN. Prediction Model of Laser 3D Projection Galvanometer Deflection Voltage Based on PROA-BP[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2024, 53(3): 0314002
    Download Citation