[1] MA B, LUO Y, ZHOU L Z, et al. The influence of calcium hydroxide on the performance of MK-based geopolymer［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 329: 127224.
[2] SUN J, CHEN G Z, LV K Q, et al. Experimental study on mechanical properties and damping characteristics of rubber geopolymer concrete［J］. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2022, 39(11): 5321-5332 (in Chinese).
[3] ALBITAR M, MOHAMED ALI M S, VISINTIN P, et al. Durability evaluation of geopolymer and conventional concretes［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 136: 374-385.
[4] HAN L, WANG X D, WU B Q, et al. In-situ synthesis of zeolite X in foam geopolymer as a CO2 adsorbent［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 372: 133591.
[5] FENG X G, LIU N, LU X Y. Backfilling performance and microscopic mechanism of high moisture content slurry solidified by composite geopolymer［J］. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 42(10): 3643-3651 (in Chinese).
[6] YANG G, ZHAO Y, ZHU L L, et al. Preparation and compressive strength of geopolymer based on alkali activated metakaolin［J］. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(3): 894-902 (in Chinese).
[7] LUO R, LU Y W, XU Y, et al. Effect of modified 5A zeolite on microstructure and efflorescence resistance of metakaolin geopolymer［J］. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 42(10): 3633-3642 (in Chinese).
[8] PUNURAI W, KROEHONG W, SAPTAMONGKOL A, et al. Mechanical properties, microstructure and drying shrinkage of hybrid fly ash-basalt fiber geopolymer paste［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 186: 62-70.
[9] JIN Y, FENG W P, DONG Z J, et al. Research progress on the glass structure of supplementary cementitious materials with relation to their hydraulic reactivity［J］. Materials Reports, 2021, 35(3): 3016-3020 (in Chinese).
[10] GAO L M, WANG Y B, GUO T T, et al. Research status of mechanical properties of metakaolin geopolymer［J］. Concrete, 2022(2): 116-120+126 (in Chinese).
[11] HE Z M, ZOU J Q, LIU A H, et al. Effect of liquid-solid ratio and maintenance mechanism on flow ability and mechanical properties of metakaolin based geopolymers［J］. New Building Materials, 2017, 44(12): 98-101 (in Chinese).
[12] PENG H, LI S L, CAI C S, et al. Study on effect of mix and curing conditions on the mechanical properties and setting time of metakaolin-based geopolymer［J］. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2014, 33(11): 2809-2817+2827 (in Chinese).
[13] YUAN J K, HE P G, JIA D C, et al. Effect of curing temperature and SiO2/K2O molar ratio on the performance of metakaolin-based geopolymers［J］. Ceramics International, 2016, 42(14): 16184-16190.
[14] HASNAOUI A, GHORBEL E, WARDEH G. Effect of curing conditions on the performance of geopolymer concrete based on granulated blast furnace slag and metakaolin［J］. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2021, 33(3): 04020501.
[15] ZHANG B F, FENG Y, XIE J H, et al. Rubberized geopolymer concrete: dependence of mechanical properties and freeze-thaw resistance on replacement ratio of crumb rubber［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 310: 125248.
[16] GAO Z H, CHEN B, CHEN J L, et al. Pore structure and mechanical properties of foam concrete under freeze-thaw environment［J/OL］. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica: 1-11 ［2023-09-11］. https://doi.org/10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20230608.001 (in Chinese).
[17] YAN D M, XIE L J, QIAN X Q, et al. Compositional dependence of pore structure, strengthand freezing-thawing resistance of metakaolin-based geopolymers［J］. Materials, 2020, 13(13): 2973.
[18] ZHAO R D, YUAN Y, CHENG Z Q, et al. Freeze-thaw resistance of Class F fly ash-based geopolymer concrete［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 222: 474-483.
[19] LI F P, CHEN D F, LU Y Y, et al. Influence of mixed fibers on fly ash based geopolymer resistance against freeze-thaw cycles［J］. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 2022, 584: 121517.
[20] ZHANG Q C, HUANG D J, ZHANG X P, et al. Effect of high wollastonite fiber incorporation on metakaolin base geopolymers’ properties and microstructure［J］. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2023, 40(8): 4694-4702 (in Chinese).
[21] WALKLEY B, KE X Y, HUSSEIN O H, et al. Incorporation of strontium and calcium in geopolymer gels［J］. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 382: 121015.
[22] JAYA N A, YUN-MING L, CHENG-YONG H, et al. Correlation between pore structure, compressive strength and thermal conductivity of porous metakaolin geopolymer［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 247: 118641.
[23] LIU J P, LI X Y, LU Y S, et al. Effects of Na/Al ratio on mechanical properties and microstructure of red mud-coal metakaolin geopolymer［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 263: 120653.
[24] FENG B W, LIU J S, CHEN Y H, et al. Properties and microstructure of self-waterproof metakaolin geopolymer with silane coupling agents［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 342: 128045.
[25] ROEK P, KRL M, MOZGAWA W. Geopolymer-zeolite composites: a review［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 230: 557-579.
[26] HOU D S, ZHANG Y, YANG T J, et al. Molecular structure, dynamics, and mechanical behavior of sodium aluminosilicate hydrate (NASH) gel at elevated temperature: a molecular dynamics study［J］. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2018, 20(31): 20695-20711.
[27] YU Z P, YANG W J. Effect ofmetakaolin on frost resistance and mesostructure of ceramsite concrete［J］. Journal of Functional Materials, 2021, 52(12): 12203-12209 (in Chinese).
[28] WANG X, ZHANG C S, WU Q S, et al. Thermal properties of metakaolin-based geopolymer modified by the silane coupling agent［J］. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2021, 267: 124655.
[29] ZHANG M, XU H Y, PHAL ZEZE A L, et al. Coating performance, durability and anti-corrosion mechanism of organic modified geopolymer composite for marine concrete protection［J］. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2022, 129: 104495.
[30] KOLEYN＇SKI A, KRL M, YCHOWICZ M. The structure of geopolymers： theoretical studies［J］. Journal of Molecular Structure, 2018, 1163: 465-471.
[31] KAYA K, SOYER-UZUN S. Evolution of structural characteristics and compressive strength in red mud-metakaolin based geopolymer systems［J］. Ceramics International, 2016, 42(6): 7406-7413.
[32] ZHU Z Y, WANG Z P, ZHOU Y, et al. Synthesis and structure of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) modified by hydroxyl-terminated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 267: 120731.
[33] OZER I, SOYER-UZUN S. Relations between the structural characteristics and compressive strength in metakaolin based geopolymers with different molar Si/Al ratios［J］. Ceramics International, 2015, 41(8): 10192-10198.
[34] ZHANG C S, WEI M, HU Z C, et al. Sulphate resistance of silane coupling agent reinforced metakaolin geopolymer composites［J］. Ceramics International, 2022, 48(17): 25254-25266.
[35] LOUATI S, BAKLOUTI S, SAMET B. Geopolymers based on phosphoric acid and illito-kaolinitic clay［J］. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2016, 2016: 2359759.
[36] TASDELEN B. Preparation, characterization and drug release properties of polyvinyl alcohol and polyvinyl pyrolidone blended hydrogels［J］. European Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2018, 1(1): 27-30.
[37] ZULKIFLY K, CHENG-YONG H, YUN-MING L, et al. Effect of phosphate addition on room-temperature-cured fly ash-metakaolin blend geopolymers［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 270: 121486.
[38] GUO H Z, YUAN P, ZHANG B F, et al. Realization of high-percentage addition of fly ash in the materials for the preparation of geopolymer derived from acid-activated metakaolin［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 285: 125430.
[39] NIE Q K, HU W, HUANG B S, et al. Synergistic utilization of red mud for flue-gas desulfurization and fly ash-based geopolymer preparation［J］. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 369: 503-511.
[40] ZHANG Q C, HUANG D J, ZHANG X P, et al. Improving the properties of metakaolin/fly ash composite geopolymers with ultrafine fly ash ground by steam-jet mill［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 387: 131673.
[41] ZHANG C, WANG G, WU C L, et al. Investigation of hierarchical porous cold bonded lightweight aggregates produced from red mud and solid-waste-based cementitious material［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 308: 124990.
[42] LIU L, HE Z, CAI X H, et al. Application of low-field NMR to the pore structure of concrete［J］. Applied Magnetic Resonance, 2021, 52(1): 15-31.
[43] ZHU F L, CHEN M, FENG Q Q. Water distribution within wetted porous fabric exposed to a thermal radiation characterized by low-field nuclear magnetic resonance［J］. Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 55(4): 1239-1243.
[44] YANG T, ZHU H J, ZHANG Z H. Influence of fly ash on the pore structure and shrinkage characteristics of metakaolin-based geopolymer pastes and mortars［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 153: 284-293.
[45] MASTALI M, KINNUNEN P, DALVAND A, et al. Drying shrinkage in alkali-activated binders： a critical review［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 190: 533-550.
[46] SI R Z, DAI Q L, GUO S C, et al. Mechanical property, nanopore structure and drying shrinkage of metakaolin-based geopolymer with waste glass powder［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 242: 118502.
[47] CHEN S K, RUAN S Q, ZENG Q, et al. Pore structure of geopolymer materials and its correlations to engineering properties: a review［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 328: 127064.
[48] YANG J. Research progress on the influence of geopolymer grouting material properties［J］. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, 2022, 1(1): 30-33.
[49] XU Z K, YUE J C, PANG G H, et al. Influence of the activator concentration and solid/liquid ratio on the strength and shrinkage characteristics of alkali-activated slag geopolymer pastes［J］. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 2021: 6631316.
