• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 9, Issue 3, 308 (2021)
Jiaran Qi*, Yongheng Mu, Shaozhi Wang, Zhiying Yin, and Jinghui Qiu
Author Affiliations
  • Department of Microwave Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.414181 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jiaran Qi, Yongheng Mu, Shaozhi Wang, Zhiying Yin, Jinghui Qiu. Birefringent transmissive metalens with an ultradeep depth of focus and high resolution[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(3): 308 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Depth of focus (DOF) and transverse resolution define the longitudinal range and definition of the focusing lens. Although metasurface axilenses and light-sword metalenses with radial and angular modulations can elongate the DOF, these approaches have inherent limitations in being reliable only for small numerical aperture (NA) cases, which in turn compromises the transverse resolution for the given aperture dimension. To conquer this limitation, we propose and experimentally demonstrate a birefringent metalens, achieving an ultradeep DOF of 41λ in terms of the total scattered field, corresponding to a record-breaking wide NA range from 0.14 to 0.7. Meanwhile, the diffraction limited focal spot size in this NA range can guarantee acquisition of images with high resolution. A hybrid methodology is proposed that utilizes both the accuracy of holography in electromagnetic field reconstruction and the polarization multiplexing to double the DOF. A stratified transmissive meta-atom is utilized to encode a pair of independent phase profiles in two orthogonal polarization channels. Furthermore, we combine the generalized scattering matrix with the multipole expansion theory for the first time to elucidate the mechanism of maintaining high transmittance and widening the transmission phase coverage by using the multilayered structure. The proposed metalens provides a competitive platform for devising high-resolution deep DOF systems for imaging and detection applications.

    1. INTRODUCTION

    Depth of focus (DOF) and transverse resolution, which determine longitudinal range and the definition of a focusing lens, are two important technical parameters of imaging systems [13]. Deep DOF lenses have received continuously growing interest due to the increasing practical demands for high resolution focusing capabilities in an extended lateral range. However, traditional solutions, such as light-sword optical elements, forward logarithmic axicons, and inverse quartic axicons, achieve desired phase profiles by propagation phase accumulation in the dielectric materials [46]. The continuous phase contour places critical demand on the surface curvature of lenses, resulting in tremendous fabrication challenges [79]. Also, bulky and nonplanar shapes may increase the difficulty in system integration, which limits their further practical applications [1013]. Alternatively, metasurfaces and the two-dimensional modality of metamaterials, have produced considerable advances in compact spatial-light-modulation devices, such as functionality multiplexing, owing to their flexible regulation of electromagnetic wavefronts and lower complexity in fabrication [1420]. With the capability of engineering amplitude, phase, and polarization of electromagnetic waves over subwavelength thickness [2130], metalenses exhibit significant superiorities over traditional lenses. Novel deep DOF metalenses are mainly developed by ring segmentation of the aperture, radial modulation (RM), and angular modulation (AM) [31,32]. The ring segmentation method divides the metalens aperture into multiple concentric rings so that the illuminating beam impinging on each ring region is focused at a different focal position. It is often used to implement nondiffractive beams such as Bessel beams [3337]. However, segmentation leads to low aperture utilization efficiency, resulting in relatively large aperture size and thus limiting practical applications of the metalenses. The RM and AM obtain phase profiles of the metalens analytically based on quasi-optical technology and ideally require a continuous phase variation profile on the metalens. Nevertheless, only under the condition of a small numerical aperture (NA), can the discrete pixels on the metalens be approximately treated as the ideal point source, and the phase profile is thus roughly continuous. Otherwise, these aforementioned design methodologies will generate large error in terms of the generated focal length and DOF. Therefore, these methods are suitable for deep DOF metalens design in a small NA scenario. An entirely different route for the DOF extension is to adopt the meta-atom supporting polarization multiplexing, e.g., Y-shaped nanoantennas and interleaved nanorods [26]. These metalenses enable simultaneous focusing of two orthogonally polarized beams, which thereby doubles the DOF achieved in a single polarization case [3840]. However, the Y-shaped nanoantenna operates in the reflection mode and is thus not a favorable solution for practical metalens implementation. Moreover, their asymmetric structure may result in focal spot deformation when the constituent metalens is offset-illuminated. As for the meta-atom composed of interleaved nanorods, which regulate the illuminating beams of different polarizations, nonnegligible cross talk may be encountered and complicate the design process. The desired phase profiles of the corresponding metalens are usually obtained by the RM only suitable for a small NA scenario or the time-consuming genetic algorithm, making it impossible to achieve the deepest possible DOF. Indeed, metalenses of small NAs can construct more uniform focal spot sizes within the entire DOF. However, this inevitably leads to an imaging system of relatively low resolution.

    Here, we demonstrate an ultracompact high transverse-resolution metalens with ultradeep DOF in the microwave region. The metalens is composed of the birefringent cross I-shaped meta-atoms, enabling flexible and independent phase regulation of two orthogonal linearly polarized electromagnetic waves. Unlike Y-shaped nanoantennas and interleaved nanorods, the meta-atom operates in the transmission mode and can realize independent modulation on two orthogonal polarization modes. In addition, we apply a modified weighted Gerchberg–Saxton method (GSWm) to retrieve phase profiles of the metalens, conquering the precision issue encountered by RM and AM for a large NA scenario [4145]. Benefiting from the high efficiency and flexibility of GSWm, the metalens can perform large NA high-resolution focusing, and meanwhile realize the deepest possible DOF for each single polarization state. The proof-of-concept metalens experimentally enables a DOF of near 41λ in a record-breaking wide NA range from 0.14 to 0.7. In addition, we combine the generalized scattering matrix with the multipole expansion theory for the first time to elucidate the physical mechanism of the stratified meta-atom.

    2. DESIGN AND METHOD

    A. Principle of Metalens and Birefringent Meta-Atom Design

    Schematic diagram of proposed birefringent metalens with ultradeep DOF. The incident linearly polarized electromagnetic wave can be decomposed into two orthogonal parts, i.e., the x-polarized (Ex) and y-polarized (Ey) beams. The birefringent metalens is able to modulate Ex or Ey independently. Holography can be applied to set several foci along the z axis (the optical axis of the metalens) for Ex and Ey beams to realize ultradeep DOF.

    Figure 1.Schematic diagram of proposed birefringent metalens with ultradeep DOF. The incident linearly polarized electromagnetic wave can be decomposed into two orthogonal parts, i.e., the x-polarized (Ex) and y-polarized (Ey) beams. The birefringent metalens is able to modulate Ex or Ey independently. Holography can be applied to set several foci along the z axis (the optical axis of the metalens) for Ex and Ey beams to realize ultradeep DOF.

    Building blocks, and calculation and simulation results of relation between transmission amplitude and phase. (a) Schematic diagram of the triple-layered cross I-shaped meta-atom; (b) surface current distribution under the illumination of the x- and the y-polarized beams, respectively; (c) simulated transmission amplitude and phase by sweeping lx and ly at 10 GHz; (d) transmission phase coverage of single-, double-, and triple-layered cross I-shaped meta-atoms against the transmission amplitude. The insets are the schematic diagrams of the two-port networks calculated by the scattering matrix.

    Figure 2.Building blocks, and calculation and simulation results of relation between transmission amplitude and phase. (a) Schematic diagram of the triple-layered cross I-shaped meta-atom; (b) surface current distribution under the illumination of the x- and the y-polarized beams, respectively; (c) simulated transmission amplitude and phase by sweeping lx and ly at 10 GHz; (d) transmission phase coverage of single-, double-, and triple-layered cross I-shaped meta-atoms against the transmission amplitude. The insets are the schematic diagrams of the two-port networks calculated by the scattering matrix.

    First of all, we decompose an arbitrary single-layered metal–dielectric square meta-atom into a metal sheet and a dielectric substrate, whose scattering matrices can be separately modeled, as shown in detail in Appendix A.1. Thus, for a stratified structure, its generalized scattering matrix can be formulated by successively cascading the scattering matrices of every single-layered meta-atom and interlayer air gap. For the dielectric substrate, the scattering parameters can be written as S11=S22=Γ(1ej2βLd)1Γ2ej2βLd,S12=S21=(1Γ2)ejβLd1Γ2ej2βLd,where Γ, β, and Ld correspond to reflection coefficient, phase-shift constant, and thickness of the dielectric substrate. With the symmetric (S11=S22), reciprocal (S12=S21), and lossless (j=12|Sji|2=1, i=1,2 and S11S12*+S21S22*=0) assumptions, one can finally express all scattering parameters of the square metal lattice as functions of the transmission phase, which read S11=sin(S21)ej(S21±π2),S21=cos(S21)ej(S21).Therefore, we can analytically study the monochromatic coherent relation between transmission amplitude and phase. The red solid line in Fig. 2(d) illustrates the theoretically predicted transmission amplitude variation with the phase for single-, double-, and triple-layered meta-atoms composed of the arbitrary metal–dielectric square lattice, similar to that shown in Fig. 2(a). The simulation results are provided as validations. It should be noted that every small blue circle represents the simulated transmission amplitude and phase of a certain cross I-shaped meta-atom with lx of a fixed value. In general, good agreement can be observed, although for double- and triple-layered meta-atoms, while lx or ly is relatively large, the simulation results slightly deviate from theoretical analysis due to the cross talk of orthogonally polarized beams, resulting from the close distance of slots. For a single-layered meta-atom, the phase covers about 100°, with the transmission amplitude larger than 2  dB. By adding extra layers, the phase coverage gradually grows, and a triple-layered meta-atom can extend the phase coverage to a complete 360°. This monochromatic analysis thus confirms that, in theory, a stratified meta-atom can effectively broaden the phase coverage while maintaining a high transmittance level. It further implies that if one can maintain the transmission amplitude while varying the geometrical details of the meta-atom, the phase coverage can be effectively extended.

    The extinction spectra of a scatterer with near-zero absorption can indirectly measure its transmittance due to the absence of absorbance [4850]. They are determined by the multipole moments that the electromagnetic illumination can excite in the scatterers, which reads σext=πk2l=1m=1,1(2l+1)Re[maE(l,m)+aM(l,m)],where the integer l represents the order of the multipole, and the integer m ranges from l to l.

    Extinction cross-sectional spectra of the cross I-shaped meta-atoms in air for the x-polarized normal incidence. Extinction cross-sectional spectra of (a) single-, (b) double-, and (c) triple-layered cross I-shaped meta-atoms. MD represents magnetic dipole, ED represents electric dipole, MQ represents magnetic quadrupole, EQ represents electric quadrupole, MO represents magnetic octupole, and EO represents electric octupole. (d) Normalized total extinction cross-sectional spectra of single-, double-, and triple-layered cross I-shaped meta-atoms under the condition of lx=ly=3.5 mm; (e) monochromatic variation of normalized total extinction cross section with lx (ly) at 10 GHz.

    Figure 3.Extinction cross-sectional spectra of the cross I-shaped meta-atoms in air for the x-polarized normal incidence. Extinction cross-sectional spectra of (a) single-, (b) double-, and (c) triple-layered cross I-shaped meta-atoms. MD represents magnetic dipole, ED represents electric dipole, MQ represents magnetic quadrupole, EQ represents electric quadrupole, MO represents magnetic octupole, and EO represents electric octupole. (d) Normalized total extinction cross-sectional spectra of single-, double-, and triple-layered cross I-shaped meta-atoms under the condition of lx=ly=3.5mm; (e) monochromatic variation of normalized total extinction cross section with lx(ly) at 10 GHz.

    B. Birefringent Metalens Based on the Modified GSW Method

    The utilized meta-atom provides a powerful physical platform for the realization of a polarization multiplexing metalens with an ultradeep DOF. We will further show how to determine accurately the phase profiles of the metalens in a large NA scenario. As aforementioned, we adopted the GSWm to obtain the desired phase profiles. We discretize the preset fields as a series of field concentration points with customized intensities along the optical axis, as shown in Fig. 1. Corresponding phase profiles of the metalens can then be defined as ϕn=arg(m=1MejkrmnrmnwmVm|Vm|),where rmn denotes the distance between the nth out of N pixels in metalens and the mth out of M target points, and Vm denotes the vector superposition of the scattering field emitted from each pixel of the metalens to the mth target point of preset fields. The weighting factor wm is applied to adjust the reconstruction accuracy of different preset field points. To improve the robustness of GSW, the relaxation factor p is introduced to scale dynamically wm for the ith step in an iteration procedure, which reads wmi=wmi1(|Vmi1||Vmi1|)p,ϕni=arg(m=1MejkrmnrmnwmiVmi1|Vmi1|).It is worth mentioning that GSWm reduces to GS and GSW when p is equal to 0 and 1, respectively. To investigate the influence of the index p on the robustness of GSWm, we calculate the sum-squared error (SSE) when p takes different values. The SSE is defined by SSE=(|Vm|Vm)2|Vm|2.

    3. NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

    GSWm and the design process of the birefringent metalens. (a) Comparison of convergence characteristics under different values of p; (b) phase profiles of the x and the y polarizations by GSWm; (c) SSE curve during the phase profiles calculation process of the x and y polarizations in the metalens; normalized intensity in the xoz plane of (d) Ex, (e) Ey, and (f) Etotal calculated by Fresnel diffraction theory. The normalized intensity along the z axis is shown in (g). The full-wave simulation results of the normalized intensity in the xoz plane of (h) Ex, (i) Ey, and (j) Etotal; (k) normalized intensity along the z axis.

    Figure 4.GSWm and the design process of the birefringent metalens. (a) Comparison of convergence characteristics under different values of p; (b) phase profiles of the x and the y polarizations by GSWm; (c) SSE curve during the phase profiles calculation process of the x and y polarizations in the metalens; normalized intensity in the xoz plane of (d) Ex, (e) Ey, and (f) Etotal calculated by Fresnel diffraction theory. The normalized intensity along the z axis is shown in (g). The full-wave simulation results of the normalized intensity in the xoz plane of (h) Ex, (i) Ey, and (j) Etotal; (k) normalized intensity along the z axis.

    Fabricated metalens and experiment results. (a) Experiment results of normalized intensities along the z axis for Ex, Ey, and Etotal; (b) normalized intensities of the total scattered field by calculation, simulation, and experiment; (c) fabricated sample of the designed metalens by GSWm; inset is a zoomed-in view of the prototype; normalized field-intensity distribution for (d) Ex, (e) Ey at different longitudinal distances.

    Figure 5.Fabricated metalens and experiment results. (a) Experiment results of normalized intensities along the z axis for Ex, Ey, and Etotal; (b) normalized intensities of the total scattered field by calculation, simulation, and experiment; (c) fabricated sample of the designed metalens by GSWm; inset is a zoomed-in view of the prototype; normalized field-intensity distribution for (d) Ex, (e) Ey at different longitudinal distances.

    High transverse-resolution imaging simulation results. (a) Full-wave simulated results of normalized intensities along the z axis for Etotal under the illumination of linearly polarized spherical wave with a polarization angle of 45° at 10 GHz; (b) square pattern consisting of four discrete points; simulated field distributions for Ex, Ey, and Etotal when the square pattern is placed at (c)–(e)z=400 mm, (f)–(h) z=600 mm, (i)–(k) z=1000 mm, and(l)–(n) z=1200 mm.

    Figure 6.High transverse-resolution imaging simulation results. (a) Full-wave simulated results of normalized intensities along the z axis for Etotal under the illumination of linearly polarized spherical wave with a polarization angle of 45° at 10 GHz; (b) square pattern consisting of four discrete points; simulated field distributions for Ex, Ey, and Etotal when the square pattern is placed at (c)–(e)z=400mm, (f)–(h) z=600mm, (i)–(k) z=1000mm, and(l)–(n) z=1200mm.

    4. CONCLUSION

    In summary, we have theoretically and experimentally proposed a high transverse-resolution transmissive metalens with an ultradeep DOF based on the birefringent stratified cross I-shaped meta-atom and the robust GSWm method. An ultradeep DOF of 1230 mm (41λ) ranging from 220 mm (7.3λ) to 1450 mm (48.3λ), corresponding to a wide NA range from 0.14 to 0.7, is presented under the illumination of a normally incident beam with a linear polarization angle of 45° at the wavelength of 30 mm. More importantly, the focal spot size is close to the corresponding diffraction limit in a wide NA range, which provides high-resolution characteristics for application, overcoming the limitation of previous deep DOF lenses that only adopted small NA focusing. The underlying operational mechanism of stratified meta-atoms is elucidated by the generalized scattering matrix and the multipole expansion theory. Further work will focus on extending the capability of the GSWm to finely shape the three-dimensional near-field distribution. The marriage of such an advanced iterative method with the birefringent stratified meta-atom in this paper will make possible a metalens with an ultra-deep DOF and more uniform focal spot size within it. Due to the size restriction in available microwave anechoic chambers, practical imaging experiments are numerically performed, which further validates our proposed methodology.

    Acknowledgment

    Acknowledgment. The paper was written through contributions of J. Qi, Y. Mu, and S. Wang. All authors have given approval to the final version of the paper. J. Qi and J. Qiu conceived the idea for this paper. J. Qi, and Y. Mu together formulated and programed the GSWm, elucidated the underlying operational mechanism of the stratified cross I-shaped meta-atom, fabricated the prototypes, and designed the experiments. Y. Mu and S. Wang conducted the measurements.

    APPENDIX A

    Analysis of the Inherent Relationship between Transmission Amplitude and Phase

    The S matrix relates the incident and scattered electromagnetic wave by [46,47] [EoutxEouty]=[S11S12S21S22][EinxEiny].By assuming that the multilayered element is symmetric (S11=S22), reciprocal (S12=S21), and lossless (j=12|Sji|2=1, i=1,2 and S11S12*+S21S22*=0), we have thus the relationship between reflection phase and transmission phase fixed by S11?S21=±π2.Under the condition that the higher-order harmonics can be omitted and the Fresnel reflection and transmission coefficient is applied, we get S21=1+S11.Substituting Eq.?(A2) into Eq.?(A3), as the real and imaginary parts of both sides of the equation are equal, we obtain |S11|=±sin(S21),|S21|=cos(S21).Therefore, all scattering parameters of square metal lattices depend only on the transmission phase, which read S11=S22=sin(S21)ej(S21±π2),S12=S21=cos(S21)ej(S21).For the dielectric substrate, the S matrix can be written as S11=S22=Γ(1?e?j2βLd)1?Γ2e?j2βLd,S12=S21=(1?Γ2)e?jβLd1?Γ2e?j2βLd,where Γ, β, and Ld correspond to the reflection coefficient, phase-shift constant, and the thickness of the dielectric substrate. When the plane wave is incident into general media, Γ and β can be, respectively, written as Γ=1?εr1+εr,β=2πεrλ0.When εr is equal to 1 or 2.85, Eqs.?(A10) and (A11) represent the electromagnetic waves propagating in the air and the dielectric substrate, respectively. Therefore, the scattering fields of the multilayered element can be theoretically calculated by cascading the S matrices corresponding to the air, square metal lattice, and dielectric substrate in order.

    Electromagnetic Multipole Expansion Analysis of Single-, Double-, and Triple-Layered Cross I-Shaped Meta-Atoms

    The field scattered by the cross I-shaped meta-atoms can be represented by the multipole expansion [4850]. The E field can be written by E(r,θ,?)=E0l=1m=?1lil[π(2l+1)]1/2XHlm,XHlm=1kaE(l,m)?×Xhlm+aM(l,m)Xhlm,Xhlm=hl(1)(kr)Xlm(θ,?),where hl(1) and Xlm are the first-kind spherical Hankel function and the normalized vector spherical harmonics function, respectively. The vector functions ?×hl(1)(kr)Xlm(θ,?) and hl(1)(kr)Xlm(θ,?) describe the field created by different electric or magnetic multipoles, where the integer l represents the order of the multipole, and the integer m ranges from ?l to l. The multipole coefficients aE(l,m) and aM(l,m) reveal the electric and magnetic excitations in cross I-shaped meta-atoms.

    For electromagnetic scatterers, aE(l,m) and aM(l,m) can be extracted by aE(l,m)=(?i)l?1k2ηOlmE0[π(2l+1)]1/2e?imφ[J(r)E1+J(r)E2]d3r,aM(l,m)=(?i)l?1k2ηOlmE0[π(2l+1)]1/2e?imφ[J(r)M1+J(r)M2]d3r,J(r)E1=[ψl(kr)+ψl(kr)]Plm(cos?θ)r^·J(r),J(r)E2=ψl(kr)kr[τlm(θ)θ^·J(r)?iπlm(θ)φ^·J(r)],J(r)M1=jl(kr)[iπlm(θ)θ^·J(r)],J(r)M2=jl(kr)[τlm(θ)φ^·J(r)],J(r)=?iω[ε(r)?εh]E(r),Olm=1l(l+1)1/2[2l+14π(l?m)!(l+m)!]1/2,τlm(θ)=ddθPlm(cos?θ),πlm(θ)=msin?θPlm(cos?θ),where Plm and ψl describe the associated Legendre polynomials and the Riccati–Bessel function, respectively. The most important step for the electromagnetic multipole expansion is to calculate the multipole coefficients, which measure the specific electric and magnetic responses to the external excitations. The integration should be calculated in a spherical surface containing the stratified meta-atom. Therefore, when l is equal to 1, 2, and 3, the corresponding multipole coefficient of the dipole, quadrupole, and octupole can be obtained.

    Since the absorption rate of the cross I-shaped meta-atom is negligible, the extinction cross section and the scattering cross section are approximately equal. Therefore, the extinction cross section reads σext=?πk2l=1m=?1,1(2l+1)Re[maE(l,m)+aM(l,m)].

    References

    [1] F. Qin, K. Huang, J. Wu, J. Teng, C. W. Qiu, M. Hong. A supercritical lens optical label-free microscopy: sub-diffraction resolution and ultra-long working distance. Adv. Mater., 29, 1602721(2017).

    [2] F. Qin, K. Huang, J. Wu, J. Jiao, X. Luo, C. Qiu, M. Hong. Shaping a subwavelength needle with ultra-long focal length by focusing azimuthally polarized light. Sci. Rep., 5, 9977(2015).

    [3] H. Dehez, A. April, M. Piché. Needles of longitudinally polarized light: guidelines for minimum spot size and tunable axial extent. Opt. Express, 20, 14891-14905(2012).

    [4] K. Petelczyc, S. Bará, A. C. Lopez, Z. Jaroszewicz, K. Kakarenko, A. Kolodziejczyk, M. Sypek. Imaging properties of the light sword optical element used as a contact lens in a presbyopic eye model. Opt. Express, 19, 25602-25616(2011).

    [5] K. Kakarenko, I. Ducin, K. Grabowiecki, Z. Jaroszewicz, A. Kolodziejczyk, A. Mira-Agudelo, K. Petelczyc, A. Składowska, M. Sypek. Assessment of imaging with extended depth-of-field by means of the light sword lens in terms of visual acuity scale. Biomed. Opt. Express, 6, 1738-1748(2015).

    [6] J. Ares, R. Flores, S. Bara, Z. Jaroszewicz. Presbyopia compensation with a quartic axicon. Optom. Vis. Sci., 82, 1071-1078(2005).

    [7] Y. J. Bao, Y. Yu, H. F. Xu, C. Guo, J. T. Li, S. Sun, Z. K. Zhou, C. W. Qiu, X. H. Wang. Full-colour nanoprint-hologram synchronous metasurface with arbitrary hue-saturation-brightness control. Light: Sci. Appl., 8, 95(2019).

    [8] N. Yu, F. Capasso. Flat optics with designer metasurfaces. Nat. Mater., 13, 139-150(2014).

    [9] A. V. Kildishev, A. Boltasseva, V. M. Shalaev. Planar photonics with metasurfaces. Science, 339, 1232009(2013).

    [10] Y. J. Bao, Y. Yu, H. F. Xu, Q. L. Lin, Y. Wang, J. T. Li, Z. K. Zhou, X. H. Wang. Coherent pixel design of metasurfaces for multidimensional optical control of multiple printing-image switching and encoding. Adv. Funct. Mater., 28, 1805306(2018).

    [11] C. Pfeiffer, A. Grbic. Metamaterial Huygens’ surfaces: tailoring wave fronts with reflectionless sheets. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 197401(2013).

    [12] C. K. Dass, H. Kwon, S. Vangala, E. M. Smith, J. W. Cleary, J. Guo, A. Alu, J. R. Hendrickson. Gap-plasmon-enhanced second-harmonic generation in epsilon-near-zero nanolayers. ACS Photon., 7, 174-179(2020).

    [13] H. Gao, Y. Wang, X. Fan, B. Jiao, T. Li, C. Shang, C. Zeng, L. Deng, W. Xiong, J. Xia, M. Hong. Dynamic 3D meta-holography in visible range with large frame number and high frame rate. Sci. Adv., 6, eaba8595(2020).

    [14] Y. Liang, K. Koshelev, F. C. Zhang, H. Lin, S. R. Lin, J. Y. Wu, B. H. Jia, Y. Kivshar. Bound states in the continuum in anisotropic plasmonic metasurfaces. Nano Lett., 20, 6351-6356(2020).

    [15] Y. X. Wang, Z. K. Wang, X. Feng, M. Zhao, C. Zeng, G. Q. He, Z. Y. Yang, Y. Zheng, J. S. Xia. Dielectric metalens-based Hartmann-Shack array for a high-efficiency optical multiparameter detection system. Photon. Res., 8, 482-489(2020).

    [16] L. X. Zhu, X. Liu, B. Sain, M. Y. Wang, C. Schlickriede, Y. T. Tang, J. H. Deng, K. F. Li, J. Yang, M. Holynski, S. Zhang, T. Zentgraf, K. Bongs, Y. H. Lien, G. X. Li. A dielectric metasurface optical chip for the generation of cold atoms. Sci. Adv., 6, eabb6667(2020).

    [17] H. X. Xu, L. Zhang, Y. Kim, G. M. Wang, X. K. Zhang, Y. M. Sun, X. H. Ling, H. W. Liu, Z. N. Chen, C. W. Qiu. Wavenumber-splitting metasurfaces achieve multichannel diffusive invisibility. Adv. Opt. Mater., 6, 1800010(2018).

    [18] Z. Y. Yang, Z. K. Wang, Y. X. Wang, X. Feng, M. Zhao, Z. J. Wan, L. Q. Zhu, J. Liu, Y. Huang, J. S. Xia, M. Wegener. Generalized Hartmann-Shack array of dielectric metalens sub-arrays for polarimetric beam profiling. Nat. Commun., 9, 4607(2018).

    [19] D. M. Lin, P. Y. Fan, E. Hasman, M. L. Brongersma. Dielectric gradient metasurface optical elements. Science, 345, 298-302(2014).

    [20] Y. Y. Cheng, Y. X. Wang, Y. Y. Niu, Z. R. Zhao. Concealed object enhancement using multi-polarization information for passive millimeter and terahertz wave security screening. Opt. Express, 28, 6350-6366(2020).

    [21] X. Zang, H. Ding, Y. Intaravanne, L. Chen, Y. Peng, J. Xie, Q. Ke, A. V. Balakin, A. P. Shkurinov, X. Chen, Y. Zhu, S. Zhuang. A multi-foci metalens with polarization-rotated focal points. Laser Photon. Rev., 13, 1900182(2019).

    [22] T. Chantakit, C. Schlickriede, B. Sain, F. Meyer, T. Weiss, N. Chattham, T. Zentgraf. All-dielectric silicon metalens for two-dimensional particle manipulation in optical tweezers. Photon. Res., 8, 1435-1440(2020).

    [23] B. Yao, X. Zang, Z. Li, L. Chen, J. Xie, Y. Zhu, S. Zhuang. Dual-layered metasurfaces for asymmetric focusing. Photon. Res., 8, 830-843(2020).

    [24] X. Zang, Y. Zhu, C. Mao, W. Xu, H. Ding, J. Xie, Q. Cheng, L. Chen, Y. Peng, Q. Hu, M. Gu, S. Zhuang. Manipulating terahertz plasmonic vortex based on geometric and dynamic phase. Adv. Opt. Mater., 7, 1801328(2019).

    [25] X. F. Zang, F. L. Dong, F. Y. Yue, C. M. Zhang, L. H. Xu, Z. W. Song, M. Chen, P. Y. Chen, G. S. Buller, Y. M. Zhu, S. L. Zhuang, W. G. Chu, S. Zhang, X. Z. Chen. Polarization encoded color image embedded in a dielectric metasurface. Adv. Mater., 30, 1707499(2018).

    [26] M. Veysi, C. Guclu, O. Boyraz, F. Capolino. Reflective metasurface lens with an elongated needle-shaped focus. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 34, 374-382(2017).

    [27] X. Y. Li, S. B. Wei, G. Y. Cao, H. Lin, Y. J. Zhao, B. H. Jia. Graphene metalens for particle nanotracking. Photon. Res., 8, 1316-1322(2020).

    [28] F. Ding, Y. T. Chen, S. I. Bozhevolnyi. Gap-surface plasmon metasurfaces for linear-polarization conversion, focusing, and beam splitting. Photon. Res., 8, 707-714(2020).

    [29] W. G. Liu, B. Hu, Z. D. Huang, H. Y. Guan, H. T. Li, X. K. Wang, Y. Zhang, H. X. Yin, X. L. Xiong, J. Liu, Y. T. Wang. Graphene-enabled electrically controlled terahertz meta-lens. Photon. Res., 6, 703-708(2018).

    [30] H. X. Xu, S. J. Ma, W. J. Luo, T. Cai, S. L. Sun, Q. He, L. Zhou. Aberration-free and functionality-switchable meta-lenses based on tunable metasurfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett., 109, 193506(2016).

    [31] Z. Zhang, D. Wen, C. Zhang, M. Chen, W. Wang, S. Chen, X. Chen. Multifunctional light sword metasurface lens. ACS Photon., 5, 1794-1799(2018).

    [32] X. Zang, W. Xu, M. Gu, B. Yao, L. Chen, Y. Peng, J. Xie, A. V. Balakin, A. P. Shkurinov, Y. Zhu, S. Zhuang. Polarization-insensitive metalens with extended focal depth and longitudinal high-tolerance imaging. Adv. Opt. Mater., 8, 1901342(2019).

    [33] Y. Fan, B. Cluzel, M. Petit, X. Le Roux, A. Lupu, A. de Lustrac. 2D waveguided Bessel beam generated using integrated metasurface-based plasmonic axicon. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 12, 21114-21119(2020).

    [34] Y. Li, B. Liang, Z. M. Gu, X. Y. Zou, J. C. Cheng. Reflected wavefront manipulation based on ultrathin planar acoustic metasurfaces. Sci. Rep., 3, 2546(2013).

    [35] S. Liu, A. Noor, L. L. Du, L. Zhang, Q. Xu, K. Luan, T. Q. Wang, Z. Tian, W. X. Tang, J. G. Han, W. L. Zhang, X. Y. Zhou, Q. Cheng, T. J. Cui. Anomalous refraction and nondiffractive Bessel-beam generation of terahertz waves through transmission-type coding metasurfaces. ACS Photon., 3, 1968-1977(2016).

    [36] X. Li, M. Pu, Z. Zhao, X. Ma, J. Jin, Y. Wang, P. Gao, X. Luo. Catenary nanostructures as compact Bessel beam generators. Sci. Rep., 6, 20524(2016).

    [37] H. Gao, M. Pu, X. Li, X. Ma, Z. Zhao, Y. Guo, X. Luo. Super-resolution imaging with a Bessel lens realized by a geometric metasurface. Opt. Express, 25, 13933-13943(2017).

    [38] E. Arbabi, A. Arbabi, S. M. Kamali, Y. Horie, A. Faraon. Multiwavelength polarization-insensitive lenses based on dielectric metasurfaces with meta-molecules. Optica, 3, 628-633(2016).

    [39] W. T. Chen, A. Y. Zhu, J. Sisler, Z. Bharwani, F. Capasso. A broadband achromatic polarization-insensitive metalens consisting of anisotropic nanostructures. Nat. Commun., 10, 355(2019).

    [40] M. Khorasaninejad, A. Y. Zhuit, C. Roques-Carmes, W. T. Chen, J. Oh, I. Mishra, R. C. Devlin, F. Capasso. Polarization-insensitive metalenses at visible wavelengths. Nano Lett., 16, 7229-7234(2016).

    [41] X. Li, L. Chen, Y. Li, X. Zhang, M. Pu, Z. Zhao, X. Ma, Y. Wang, M. Hong, X. Luo. Multicolor 3D meta-holography by broadband plasmonic modulation. Sci. Adv., 2, e1601102(2016).

    [42] X. Zhang, X. Li, J. Jin, M. Pu, X. Ma, J. Luo, Y. Guo, C. Wang, X. Luo. Polarization-independent broadband meta-holograms via polarization-dependent nanoholes. Nanoscale, 10, 9304-9310(2018).

    [43] K. Huang, Z. Dong, S. Mei, L. Zhang, Y. Liu, H. Liu, H. Zhu, J. Teng, B. Luk’yanchuk, J. K. W. Yang, C. W. Qiu. Silicon multi-meta-holograms for the broadband visible light. Laser Photon. Rev., 10, 500-509(2016).

    [44] K. E. Chong, L. Wang, I. Staude, A. R. James, J. Dominguez, S. Liu, G. S. Subramania, M. Decker, D. N. Neshev, I. Brener, Y. S. Kiyshar. Efficient polarization-insensitive complex wavefront control using Huygens’ metasurfaces based on dielectric resonant meta-atoms. ACS Photon., 3, 514-519(2016).

    [45] L. Wang, S. Kruk, H. Tang, T. Li, I. Kravchenko, D. N. Neshev, Y. S. Kivshar. Grayscale transparent metasurface holograms. Optica, 3, 1504-1505(2016).

    [46] H. X. Xu, T. Cai, Y. Q. Zhuang, Q. Peng, G. M. Wang, J. G. Liang. Dual-mode transmissive metasurface and its applications in multibeam transmitarray. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 65, 1797-1806(2017).

    [47] A. H. Abdelrahman, A. Z. Elsherbeni, F. Yang. Transmission phase limit of multilayer frequency-selective surfaces for transmitarray designs. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 62, 690-697(2014).

    [48] T. Shi, Y. J. Wang, Z. L. Deng, X. Ye, Z. X. Dai, Y. Y. Cao, B. O. Guan, S. M. Xiao, X. P. Li. All-dielectric kissing-dimer metagratings for asymmetric high diffraction. Adv. Opt. Mater., 7, 1901389(2019).

    [49] A. B. Evlyukhin, C. Reinhardt, B. N. Chichkov. Multipole light scattering by nonspherical nanoparticles in the discrete dipole approximation. Phys. Rev. B, 84, 235429(2011).

    [50] P. Grahn, A. Shevchenko, M. Kaivola. Electromagnetic multipole theory for optical nanomaterials. New J. Phys., 14, 093033(2012).

    Jiaran Qi, Yongheng Mu, Shaozhi Wang, Zhiying Yin, Jinghui Qiu. Birefringent transmissive metalens with an ultradeep depth of focus and high resolution[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(3): 308
    Download Citation